California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB630

Introduced
2/20/25  
Refer
3/5/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Refer
4/2/25  
Refer
4/21/25  
Report Pass
4/23/25  
Refer
4/23/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Report Pass
4/23/25  
Refer
4/23/25  
Engrossed
6/3/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Refer
6/9/25  
Engrossed
6/3/25  
Refer
6/9/25  
Refer
6/23/25  
Refer
6/23/25  
Refer
6/27/25  
Report Pass
7/15/25  

Caption

State parks: real property: acquisitions and leases.

Impact

This legislation is set to significantly impact state taxation laws by modifying the framework for motion picture tax credits, including adjustments to the eligible amounts and types of productions that qualify. It also seeks to streamline the process by which the Department of Parks and Recreation can acquire and lease properties, thereby facilitating quicker enhancements and expansions of state parks. By increasing the tax credit allocation and allowing faster property acquisition, the bill is expected to bolster the local film industry and improve public access to parks.

Summary

Senate Bill 630, introduced by Senators Allen, Menjivar, Prez, and Stern, aims to amend provisions relating to income and corporate taxes, particularly focusing on tax credits for motion pictures while also addressing the state's management and acquisition of real property for parks. Specifically, the bill revises criteria for tax credits related to certified film productions in California and expands the authority of the Department of Parks and Recreation for property acquisitions and leases, enabling it to bypass certain approvals under specific circumstances.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 630 seems to be positive among proponents who believe that easing restrictions on film production incentives will lead to an influx of productions in California, supporting local economies. Conversely, there are concerns from some lawmakers about potential adverse effects on state revenue due to increased tax credit allocations. The sentiment reflects a balance between supporting the film industry and ensuring adequate state funding.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the increased monetary limits for property transactions that the Department of Parks and Recreation can engage in without widespread approval, which some critics argue might lead to inadequate oversight on state property acquisitions. Additionally, the increase in potential tax credits for film productions raises questions about their long-term impact on California's budget and priorities concerning education and infrastructure funding. The successful passage of this bill requires a two-thirds majority in the legislature due to the tax implications, highlighting the contentious nature of tax policy reforms.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB2103

Department of Parks and Recreation: Big Basin Redwoods, Año Nuevo, and Butano State Parks: real property acquisition.

CA AB566

Department of Parks and Recreation: acquisition and protection of real property.

CA SB387

State property: sale or lease: broadband development.

CA SB240

Surplus state real property: affordable housing and housing for formerly incarcerated individuals.

CA AB2525

State highways: property leases.

CA SB475

Park property: City of Laguna Woods: City Centre Park.

CA AB919

Residential real property: sale of rental properties: right of first offer.

CA SB958

Surplus state property: County of Napa.

CA SB256

Parklands: City of Davis.

CA AB1937

State parks: Pedro Point.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.