California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB635

Introduced
2/20/25  
Refer
3/19/25  
Refer
3/26/25  
Report Pass
4/3/25  
Refer
4/7/25  
Report Pass
4/3/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Refer
4/7/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Refer
5/1/25  
Refer
5/1/25  
Engrossed
6/3/25  
Refer
6/9/25  
Report Pass
7/3/25  
Refer
7/3/25  
Report Pass
7/16/25  
Refer
7/16/25  

Caption

Food vendors and facilities: enforcement activities.

Impact

The bill significantly modifies existing laws surrounding the regulation of sidewalk vendors by establishing strict limitations on the collection and sharing of personally identifiable information that could expose vendors to immigration enforcement actions. Local authorities will no longer inquire about vendors' immigration status, nor will they require background checks during the permitting process. Additionally, if local agencies have collected sensitive information prior to the bill's enactment, they must destroy that information, promoting an environment of trust between immigrant communities and government agencies. This change is considered critical in supporting the local economy and enabling aspiring vendors to formalize their businesses without fear.

Summary

Senate Bill 635, also referred to as the Street Vendor Business Protection Act, aims to enact provisions that limit local authorities' ability to disclose information regarding sidewalk vendors to immigration enforcement agents. Introduced by Senator Durazo, this bill amends various sections of the Government and Health and Safety Codes to create a more supportive environment for sidewalk vendors, who often face challenges related to their immigration status and the risk of deportation. The underlying intent is to bolster entrepreneurship among low-income and immigrant communities by establishing guidelines that promote their safety and welfare.

Sentiment

The discussions surrounding SB 635 indicate a positive sentiment towards supporting vulnerable vendor populations and enhancing community trust. Advocates argue that the bill will help normalize and legitimize sidewalk vending as a viable economic option. However, there are noted concerns from some legislative opponents about potential overreach and the implications of local governments losing regulatory authority. The balance between protecting vendors and maintaining effective local oversight structures is expected to be a focal point of debate as the bill progresses.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns that the bill undermines local governments' powers to regulate public spaces and might complicate enforcement against non-compliance among vendors. Some legislators worry that the protections supplied could lead to difficulties in ensuring public health and safety within sidewalk vending operations. However, supporters argue that these regulations will encourage compliance through providing a degree of protection from intimidation related to immigration status. The overarching contention centers on the balance of protecting marginalized communities while safeguarding local governmental powers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB2791

Sidewalk vendors: annual fairs.

CA AB642

Law enforcement agencies: facial recognition technology.

CA SB27

University of California: vendors.

CA SB50

Vehicles: enforcement.

CA AB3043

Occupational safety: fabrication activities.

CA AB441

Temporary food facilities: permitting: farmers’ markets and night markets.

CA AB2645

Electronic toll collection systems: information sharing: law enforcement.

CA SB580

Schoolbuses: stop signal arm enforcement system.

CA SB1082

Augmented residential care facilities.

CA SB345

Health care services: legally protected health care activities.

Similar Bills

CA SB946

Sidewalk vendors.

CA SB1290

Sidewalk vendors.

CA SB276

City and County of San Francisco: merchandising sales.

CA AB2791

Sidewalk vendors: annual fairs.