Juries: peremptory challenges.
If SB645 is enacted, it would significantly affect how juror selections are conducted in California by reinforcing protections against discriminatory practices in the judiciary. The proposed bill emphasizes the importance of a jury that in its composition reflects the diversity of the community and upholds an unbiased judicial process. Additionally, it mandates that any objections to the use of peremptory challenges based on the outlined discriminatory factors must be evaluated by the court, holding parties accountable for their choice in juror exclusions.
Senate Bill No. 645, introduced by Senator Umberg on February 20, 2025, seeks to amend and repeal Section 231.7 of the Code of Civil Procedure relating to the use of peremptory challenges in jury selection. The bill aims to extend the current prohibition on removing jurors based on race, ethnicity, gender, and other specified characteristics from civil cases indefinitely. This move follows existing laws that prevent such discrimination until January 1, 2026, thereby addressing concerns regarding the fairness and equity of jury selection processes in the state.
The discussion surrounding SB645 may center around debates regarding how far the protections against peremptory challenges should extend. Supporters advocate for the necessity of such measures to prevent systemic biases and uphold justice, particularly in civil cases, which often lack the same level of scrutiny as criminal cases. However, critics may raise concerns about the implications for legal strategy and the rights of litigants to select jurors according to their preferences. The balance between ensuring an equitable judicial process and preserving the integrity of jury selection remains a point of contention among lawmakers.