California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB774

Introduced
2/21/25  
Refer
3/12/25  
Report Pass
4/29/25  
Refer
5/1/25  
Report Pass
4/29/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Refer
5/1/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
5/29/25  

Caption

Department of Real Estate and the Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers.

Impact

The primary impact of SB 774 extends the sunset review date for both the Department of Real Estate and the Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers from January 1, 2026, to January 1, 2030. This extension allows for a comprehensive assessment of their operations, enhancing regulatory oversight. Additionally, the bill includes provisions to compile reports that will provide transparency regarding military, veteran, and spouse licensure, which is pivotal for ensuring these individuals receive fair access to real estate licenses.

Summary

Senate Bill 774, introduced by Senator Ashby, seeks to amend various sections of the Business and Professions Code related to the regulation of real estate and appraisal professions in California. The bill specifically aims to evaluate the functions of the Department of Real Estate and the Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers through a joint legislative sunset review process. It is intended to ensure that these regulatory bodies effectively serve their purpose in overseeing real estate licensees and appraisers in California.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 774 appears to be supportive among stakeholders in the real estate industry, who may view it as a necessary step to evaluate and optimize the regulatory framework for real estate professionals. By focusing on improvements and accountability, the bill aims to enhance public trust and ensure the competency of real estate services. However, there may also be dissent from those who feel that the regulatory processes are already adequate and do not require an extension of oversight or further bureaucratic processes.

Contention

A notable point of contention could arise regarding the balance between regulatory oversight and operational flexibility for the Department of Real Estate and the Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers. Critics may argue that excessive regulation could hamper the efficiency and responsiveness of these entities. Conversely, supporters may contend that thorough evaluations are essential to prevent regulatory actions that do not align with the current needs of the marketplace and protect consumers. As the bill moves forward, these discussions will likely shape its implementation and effectiveness.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB263

Real estate applicants and licensees: education requirements: fair housing and implicit bias training.

AZ HB2694

Department of real estate; fees

AZ HB2624

Timeshare salespersons; licensure

CA SB1495

Professions and vocations.

CA SB800

Real estate: licenses.

AZ SB1171

Real estate department; licensing; administration