California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB791

Introduced
2/21/25  
Refer
3/12/25  
Refer
3/24/25  
Refer
4/2/25  
Report Pass
4/23/25  
Refer
4/23/25  
Refer
4/30/25  
Report Pass
4/23/25  
Refer
5/6/25  
Refer
4/23/25  
Refer
4/30/25  
Engrossed
6/3/25  

Caption

Vehicle dealers: document processing charge.

Impact

The implications of SB 791 could significantly alter the cost structure faced by vehicle buyers in California. By allowing higher document processing charges, the bill may increase the total cost of purchasing a vehicle. This could impact consumer behavior as buyers reassess their budgets in light of potentially higher fees. Dealers are likely to support the changes, viewing them as a means to recoup administrative costs associated with processing vehicle registrations. However, it might raise concerns about consumer protection and affordability, especially in a state already known for its high cost of living.

Summary

Senate Bill 791, introduced by Senator Cortese and co-authored by several other senators and assembly members, seeks to amend Section 4456.5 of the California Vehicle Code concerning the document processing charges that vehicle dealers may impose on purchasers or lessees. Currently, dealers can charge these fees, which cover preparation, processing, and disclosures related to vehicle registration and titling. The existing limits allow dealers with agreements with the DMV to charge up to $85, while other dealers are limited to $70. SB 791 aims to adjust these fees by permitting charges that exceed current limits under specific conditions, namely if they do not surpass 1% of the vehicle's total price and a cap of $500. Additionally, this bill would specifically exempt sales to the State of California from these provisions.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB 791 appears largely supportive among vehicle dealers who argue that the bill offers necessary flexibility in covering rising operational costs. However, consumer advocacy groups express concerns that it disproportionately benefits dealers at the expense of purchasers, calling into question the fairness and transparency of additional charges. This divide suggests a broader ongoing discussion regarding the balance of interests between business practices and consumer rights in the automotive sector.

Contention

Key points of contention within discussions surrounding SB 791 center around the appropriateness of increased document processing charges. Opponents argue that raising the fee limits could lead to excessive charges by dealers, which may not correlate with the actual costs of services provided. Furthermore, there is apprehension regarding the lack of protections to prevent dealers from unreasonably inflating these fees, leading to calls for more stringent consumer protection measures to ensure that buyers are not exploited in a complex vehicle purchasing process. Ultimately, the debate encapsulates broader themes in regulatory practices and consumer rights.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1249

Vehicle dealers: document processing charge.

CA AB2796

State highway routes: Route 241.

CA AB3163

Department of Motor Vehicles: private industry partners: electronic submission of documents.

CA AB2227

Motorcycles: hang tags.

CA SB235

Civil discovery.

CA SB66

Civil discovery.

CA SB465

Property Assessed Clean Energy Program: wildfire safety improvements.

CA SB301

Marketplaces: online marketplaces.