California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB812

Introduced
2/21/25  
Refer
3/12/25  
Refer
4/8/25  
Report Pass
5/1/25  
Refer
5/5/25  
Report Pass
5/1/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Refer
5/5/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
5/28/25  
Engrossed
5/28/25  
Refer
6/16/25  
Refer
6/16/25  
Report Pass
7/16/25  

Caption

Qualified youth drop-in center health care coverage.

Impact

The enactment of SB 812 is expected to significantly enhance access to mental health and substance use disorder treatment for youth, particularly those who may not seek care in a traditional school environment. By including qualified youth drop-in centers, the bill expands the reach of the healthcare safety net for young Californians, especially those who may benefit from more informal or accessible settings. This could lead to better health outcomes for youth experiencing mental health challenges, as well as a potential decrease in emergency room visits related to untreated conditions.

Summary

Senate Bill 812, introduced by Senator Allen, seeks to expand healthcare coverage related to mental health and substance use disorders for youth. Specifically, the bill aims to amend existing provisions by expanding the definition of 'schoolsite' to include qualified youth drop-in centers. This expansion mandates that health care service plans, effective from January 1, 2024, cover necessary treatments for individuals aged 25 or younger when provided at these youth drop-in centers, similar to existing requirements for services delivered at traditional school settings. Furthermore, non-compliance with these coverage mandates would result in criminal offenses under the updated regulations.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 812 appears to be largely positive, particularly among advocates for youth mental health. Supporters argue that the bill is a crucial step towards addressing the healthcare needs of young people, especially in vulnerable populations. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the potential financial implications and the burden on service providers, as the expansion may require additional resources without a clear framework for funding and reimbursement dynamics.

Contention

Despite the general support for SB 812, there are notable points of contention. Detractors may voice concerns over the adequacy of funding mechanisms for the expanded services and whether health plans will comply effectively with the new requirements. Additionally, there might be apprehensions about whether the infrastructure at youth drop-in centers is sufficiently equipped to deliver complex mental health services, raising questions about the adequacy of training for staff and the quality of care provided in these spaces.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB2449

Health care coverage: qualified autism service providers.

CA AB1926

Health care coverage: regional enteritis.

CA AB1549

Medi-Cal: federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics.

CA SB282

Medi-Cal: federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics.

CA SB238

Health care coverage: independent medical review.

CA AB620

Health care coverage for metabolic disorders.

CA SB294

Health care coverage: independent medical review.

CA SB1397

Behavioral health services coverage.

CA SB1290

Health care coverage: essential health benefits.

CA AB1977

Health care coverage: behavioral diagnoses.

Similar Bills

CA AB177

Health.

CA SB177

Health.

CA SB508

Mental health coverage: school-based services.

CA AB552

Integrated School-Based Behavioral Health Partnership Program.

CA SB159

Health.

CA AB2315

Pupil health: mental and behavioral health services: telehealth technology: guidelines.

CA AB1744

After school programs: substance use prevention: funding: cannabis revenue.

CA AB159

Health.