Accessory Dwelling Units: ordinances.
This bill will significantly impact local ordinances governing accessory dwelling units by invalidating those that do not comply within a specified timeframe. If local agencies fail to submit their ADU ordinances to the Department of Housing and Community Development within 60 days or do not respond within 30 days to findings that their ordinances do not meet state standards, such ordinances will be considered null and void. This places greater authority at the state level concerning land use and housing policy, potentially undermining local governance in urban planning matters.
Senate Bill 9, introduced by Senator Arregun, aims to amend the Planning and Zoning Law regarding the creation and approval of accessory dwelling units (ADUs) by local agencies in California. The bill emphasizes a streamlined, ministerial approval process for ADUs and removes unnecessary owner-occupancy requirements and additional standards that local agencies may impose on these units. The proposed legislation focuses on facilitating the creation of ADUs, which are seen as vital for addressing the state’s housing crisis by increasing housing availability and density without requiring large-scale new developments.
The sentiment surrounding SB 9 appears supportive among proponents of progressive housing policies, who argue that easing restrictions on ADUs could help alleviate the state's housing shortage by allowing more flexible living arrangements. However, there is some contention among local government representatives, who express concerns that the removal of local control over housing policies may not account for unique community needs and context. This creates a tension between state-level housing solutions and local governance on zoning issues.
Notable points of contention in discussions about SB 9 revolve around the balance between increasing housing supply through ADUs and maintaining local control over zoning and development. Opponents of the bill argue that removing owner-occupant requirements and imposing state regulations may lead to unintended consequences, such as a proliferation of rental units that do not integrate well into existing neighborhoods. Additionally, there are concerns over how local agencies can address infrastructural and public service needs in rapidly developing areas without adequate regulatory power.