1 | 1 | | CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20252026 REGULAR SESSION Senate Joint Resolution No. 5Introduced by Senator BeckerApril 22, 2025 Relative to enteric methane.LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTSJR 5, as introduced, Becker. Enteric methane reduction solutions: cattle industries.This measure would express the Legislatures commitment to advancing innovative solutions that reduce enteric methane emissions while preserving the economic sustainability of the cattle industries. The measure would urge the United States Congress to explore advancing innovative solutions in enteric methane emission reduction while preserving the economic sustainability of the cattle industries.Digest Key Fiscal Committee: NO Bill TextWHEREAS, California is committed to reducing emissions of greenhouse gases and advancing sustainable agricultural practices while supporting the economic viability and circular economy principles of its cattle industries; andWHEREAS, Solutions can be defined as developing or established technologies and practices that consist of, but are not limited to, feed additives, breeding practices, byproduct-based diets, and biosolutions; andWHEREAS, Enteric methane emissions from livestock are a source of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, and reducing these emissions can contribute to Californias climate goals; andWHEREAS, Scientific research has demonstrated that certain solutions can reduce enteric methane emissions in cattle without compromising milk and beef production; andWHEREAS, Scientific research is still needed to comprehensively assess the cost-effectiveness of enteric methane reduction solutions, the potential long-term impacts on animal health, and the environmental safety and methane reduction efficacy of these solutions; andWHEREAS, The voluntary adoption of enteric methane reduction solutions by Californias cattle industries can help achieve Californias methane reduction goals but must maintain the economic sustainability of its cattle industries; andWHEREAS, The costs associated with implementing enteric methane reduction solutions should not impose an undue financial burden on the cattle industries, and cost drivers should be addressed through financial incentives or market-based compensation mechanisms; andWHEREAS, Consumer confidence in cattle products is essential to the success of Californias cattle industries, and the adoption of enteric methane reduction solutions must be carefully balanced against consumer acceptance, ensuring transparency, food safety, and continued market trust; andWHEREAS, A competitive and diverse marketplace for enteric methane reduction solutions is necessary to ensure that no single product or manufacturer is given preference, allowing the cattle industries to choose the most effective and economically viable solutions for their operations; andWHEREAS, Organic cattle and dairy producers must have access to enteric methane reduction solutions that comply with organic certification standards, ensuring that all segments involved in the cattle industries can participate in methane reduction efforts while maintaining their market integrity; andWHEREAS, The voluntary use of enteric methane reduction solutions by the cattle industries shall not be construed to grant the State Air Resources Board regulatory authority over enteric methane emissions beyond existing law; andWHEREAS, Any revenues generated from enteric methane reduction efforts, including those from carbon markets or supply chain incentives, should be directed to the cattle industries implementing these reductions; now, therefore, be itResolved by the Senate and the Assembly of the State of California, jointly,That the Legislature of the State of California remains committed to advancing innovative solutions that reduce enteric methane emissions while preserving the economic sustainability of Californias cattle industries, and that the voluntary use of enteric methane reduction solutions should be encouraged as part of a broader strategy that thoughtfully balances environmental progress with market viability and consumer confidence; and be it furtherResolved,That the Legislature of the State of California urges the United States Congress to explore advancing innovative solutions in enteric methane emission reduction while preserving the economic sustainability of the cattle industries, and that the voluntary use of enteric methane reduction solutions should be encouraged as part of a broader strategy that thoughtfully balances environmental progress with market viability and consumer confidence generally; and be it furtherResolved,That the Secretary of the Senate transmit copies of this resolution to the Governor, the Secretary of Food and Agriculture, the Chair of the State Air Resources Board, the United States Department of Agriculture, the United States Food and Drug Administration, other relevant stakeholders, the President and Vice President of the United States, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Majority Leader of the Senate, and each Senator and Representative from California in the Congress of the United States. |
---|
2 | 2 | | |
---|
3 | 3 | | CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20252026 REGULAR SESSION Senate Joint Resolution No. 5Introduced by Senator BeckerApril 22, 2025 Relative to enteric methane.LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTSJR 5, as introduced, Becker. Enteric methane reduction solutions: cattle industries.This measure would express the Legislatures commitment to advancing innovative solutions that reduce enteric methane emissions while preserving the economic sustainability of the cattle industries. The measure would urge the United States Congress to explore advancing innovative solutions in enteric methane emission reduction while preserving the economic sustainability of the cattle industries.Digest Key Fiscal Committee: NO |
---|
4 | 4 | | |
---|
5 | 5 | | |
---|
6 | 6 | | |
---|
7 | 7 | | |
---|
8 | 8 | | |
---|
9 | 9 | | CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20252026 REGULAR SESSION |
---|
10 | 10 | | |
---|
11 | 11 | | Senate Joint Resolution |
---|
12 | 12 | | |
---|
13 | 13 | | No. 5 |
---|
14 | 14 | | |
---|
15 | 15 | | Introduced by Senator BeckerApril 22, 2025 |
---|
16 | 16 | | |
---|
17 | 17 | | Introduced by Senator Becker |
---|
18 | 18 | | April 22, 2025 |
---|
19 | 19 | | |
---|
20 | 20 | | |
---|
21 | 21 | | |
---|
22 | 22 | | Relative to enteric methane. |
---|
23 | 23 | | |
---|
24 | 24 | | LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST |
---|
25 | 25 | | |
---|
26 | 26 | | ## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST |
---|
27 | 27 | | |
---|
28 | 28 | | SJR 5, as introduced, Becker. Enteric methane reduction solutions: cattle industries. |
---|
29 | 29 | | |
---|
30 | 30 | | This measure would express the Legislatures commitment to advancing innovative solutions that reduce enteric methane emissions while preserving the economic sustainability of the cattle industries. The measure would urge the United States Congress to explore advancing innovative solutions in enteric methane emission reduction while preserving the economic sustainability of the cattle industries. |
---|
31 | 31 | | |
---|
32 | 32 | | This measure would express the Legislatures commitment to advancing innovative solutions that reduce enteric methane emissions while preserving the economic sustainability of the cattle industries. The measure would urge the United States Congress to explore advancing innovative solutions in enteric methane emission reduction while preserving the economic sustainability of the cattle industries. |
---|
33 | 33 | | |
---|
34 | 34 | | ## Digest Key |
---|
35 | 35 | | |
---|
36 | 36 | | ## Bill Text |
---|
37 | 37 | | |
---|
38 | 38 | | WHEREAS, California is committed to reducing emissions of greenhouse gases and advancing sustainable agricultural practices while supporting the economic viability and circular economy principles of its cattle industries; and |
---|
39 | 39 | | |
---|
40 | 40 | | WHEREAS, Solutions can be defined as developing or established technologies and practices that consist of, but are not limited to, feed additives, breeding practices, byproduct-based diets, and biosolutions; and |
---|
41 | 41 | | |
---|
42 | 42 | | WHEREAS, Enteric methane emissions from livestock are a source of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, and reducing these emissions can contribute to Californias climate goals; and |
---|
43 | 43 | | |
---|
44 | 44 | | WHEREAS, Scientific research has demonstrated that certain solutions can reduce enteric methane emissions in cattle without compromising milk and beef production; and |
---|
45 | 45 | | |
---|
46 | 46 | | WHEREAS, Scientific research is still needed to comprehensively assess the cost-effectiveness of enteric methane reduction solutions, the potential long-term impacts on animal health, and the environmental safety and methane reduction efficacy of these solutions; and |
---|
47 | 47 | | |
---|
48 | 48 | | WHEREAS, The voluntary adoption of enteric methane reduction solutions by Californias cattle industries can help achieve Californias methane reduction goals but must maintain the economic sustainability of its cattle industries; and |
---|
49 | 49 | | |
---|
50 | 50 | | WHEREAS, The costs associated with implementing enteric methane reduction solutions should not impose an undue financial burden on the cattle industries, and cost drivers should be addressed through financial incentives or market-based compensation mechanisms; and |
---|
51 | 51 | | |
---|
52 | 52 | | WHEREAS, Consumer confidence in cattle products is essential to the success of Californias cattle industries, and the adoption of enteric methane reduction solutions must be carefully balanced against consumer acceptance, ensuring transparency, food safety, and continued market trust; and |
---|
53 | 53 | | |
---|
54 | 54 | | WHEREAS, A competitive and diverse marketplace for enteric methane reduction solutions is necessary to ensure that no single product or manufacturer is given preference, allowing the cattle industries to choose the most effective and economically viable solutions for their operations; and |
---|
55 | 55 | | |
---|
56 | 56 | | WHEREAS, Organic cattle and dairy producers must have access to enteric methane reduction solutions that comply with organic certification standards, ensuring that all segments involved in the cattle industries can participate in methane reduction efforts while maintaining their market integrity; and |
---|
57 | 57 | | |
---|
58 | 58 | | WHEREAS, The voluntary use of enteric methane reduction solutions by the cattle industries shall not be construed to grant the State Air Resources Board regulatory authority over enteric methane emissions beyond existing law; and |
---|
59 | 59 | | |
---|
60 | 60 | | WHEREAS, Any revenues generated from enteric methane reduction efforts, including those from carbon markets or supply chain incentives, should be directed to the cattle industries implementing these reductions; now, therefore, be it |
---|
61 | 61 | | |
---|
62 | 62 | | Resolved by the Senate and the Assembly of the State of California, jointly,That the Legislature of the State of California remains committed to advancing innovative solutions that reduce enteric methane emissions while preserving the economic sustainability of Californias cattle industries, and that the voluntary use of enteric methane reduction solutions should be encouraged as part of a broader strategy that thoughtfully balances environmental progress with market viability and consumer confidence; and be it further |
---|
63 | 63 | | |
---|
64 | 64 | | Resolved,That the Legislature of the State of California urges the United States Congress to explore advancing innovative solutions in enteric methane emission reduction while preserving the economic sustainability of the cattle industries, and that the voluntary use of enteric methane reduction solutions should be encouraged as part of a broader strategy that thoughtfully balances environmental progress with market viability and consumer confidence generally; and be it further |
---|
65 | 65 | | |
---|
66 | 66 | | Resolved,That the Secretary of the Senate transmit copies of this resolution to the Governor, the Secretary of Food and Agriculture, the Chair of the State Air Resources Board, the United States Department of Agriculture, the United States Food and Drug Administration, other relevant stakeholders, the President and Vice President of the United States, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Majority Leader of the Senate, and each Senator and Representative from California in the Congress of the United States. |
---|