Colorado House Bill HB1182

Colorado 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/7/22
• Refer: 2/7/22
• Report Pass: 2/8/22
• Refer: 2/8/22
• Engrossed: 2/14/22
• Refer: 2/14/22
• Report Pass: 2/15/22
• Refer: 2/15/22
• Engrossed: 2/25/22
• Enrolled: 2/25/22
• Passed: 3/7/22

Caption

Department of State Supplemental

Impact

The passage of HB 1182 has significant implications for state laws related to public administration and election processes. By supplementing the budget of the Department of State, the bill aims to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of state services. This added funding will likely improve the management of elections and the implementation of technology necessary for transparent and secure electoral processes. Furthermore, the fiscal adjustments in the bill indicate a legislative commitment to maintaining the integrity of the state's governance structures in times of budgetary shortfalls.

Summary

House Bill 1182 is a supplemental appropriation bill concerning the funding for the Department of State. The primary objective of this bill is to provide additional financial resources to support various divisions within the Department, including administration, elections, and information technology. The bill outlines specific appropriations for personal services, operating expenses, and various programs that facilitate the department’s operations. Overall, this supplemental funding is intended to ensure that the Department of State can effectively deliver its responsibilities while addressing any unforeseen financial needs that may have arisen since the original budget was established.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1182 appears to be generally supportive among state legislators, as it is considered essential to ensure the Department of State continues to operate smoothly and fulfill its duties. Lawmakers recognize the importance of adequately funding state departments to promote good governance and the efficient administration of public services. However, there may be underlying concerns regarding budget allocations and the prioritization of funding across various state needs, as some legislators argue for more scrutinous considerations of fiscal responsibility in budgetary matters.

Contention

While there were no major points of contention highlighted in the discussions around HB 1182, the bill does present an opportunity for debate regarding the allocation of state resources. Lawmakers may have differing opinions on what areas should receive additional funding and how such appropriations reflect overarching state priorities. The provision of supplemental appropriations often raises questions about accountability, transparency, and whether the existing budget sufficiently addresses the needs of all state departments before considering additional spending.