Colorado 2022 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1213

Introduced
2/8/22  
Refer
2/8/22  
Report Pass
3/1/22  
Refer
3/1/22  
Report Pass
3/14/22  
Refer
3/14/22  
Report Pass
3/23/22  
Refer
3/23/22  
Engrossed
3/29/22  
Refer
3/29/22  
Report Pass
4/4/22  
Refer
4/4/22  
Report Pass
4/12/22  
Refer
4/12/22  
Engrossed
5/14/22  
Engrossed
5/16/22  
Enrolled
5/16/22  

Caption

Sunset Continue Regulation Speech-language Pathologists

Impact

The bill's passage would have a significant impact on state laws related to the regulation of health professionals. By continuing the existing framework for oversight, the bill seeks to uphold the standards of practice for speech-language pathologists, which is crucial not only for practitioners but also for clients who rely on their services. The regulation is designed to prevent malpractice and ensure that practitioners are properly certified to provide care, which is essential for public safety and trust in healthcare professions.

Summary

House Bill 1213 aims to extend the regulation of speech-language pathologists by the Director of the Division of Professions and Occupations in the Department of Regulatory Agencies for an additional 11 years, until September 1, 2033. The bill responds to recommendations from the department's sunset review process, ensuring continuous oversight of speech-language pathology practices and maintaining standards in the profession. This measure is intended to protect the public by ensuring that professionals in this field adhere to established guidelines and regulations.

Sentiment

Sentiment around HB 1213 has largely been positive, with support from those advocating for healthcare regulation as a means to ensure quality treatment for patients. However, some potential concerns may arise regarding the implications for practitioners in terms of licensure and professional mobility. While the bill is seen as a necessary measure to protect the public, discussions around regulatory burdens on healthcare providers are ongoing.

Contention

While the bill primarily enjoys bipartisan support, there are notable points of contention regarding the balance of regulation and accessibility of services. Critics may argue that overly stringent regulations could complicate the entry of new professionals into the field, thereby limiting access to speech-language services for those in need. The ongoing discussions reflect a broader debate within the legislative context around healthcare practices, regulatory oversight, and the need for the state to protect its citizens while fostering an environment conducive to professional growth.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.