1 | 1 | | Second Regular Session |
---|
2 | 2 | | Seventy-third General Assembly |
---|
3 | 3 | | STATE OF COLORADO |
---|
4 | 4 | | INTRODUCED |
---|
5 | 5 | | |
---|
6 | 6 | | |
---|
7 | 7 | | LLS NO. 22-0766.01 Jason Gelender x4330 |
---|
8 | 8 | | SENATE BILL 22-119 |
---|
9 | 9 | | Senate Committees House Committees |
---|
10 | 10 | | Finance |
---|
11 | 11 | | A BILL FOR AN ACT |
---|
12 | 12 | | C |
---|
13 | 13 | | ONCERNING CONSERVATION EASEMENTS , AND, IN CONNECTION101 |
---|
14 | 14 | | THEREWITH, ALLOWING TAXPAYERS WHO WERE PREVIOUSLY102 |
---|
15 | 15 | | DENIED A STATE INCOME TAX CREDIT FOR DONATING103 |
---|
16 | 16 | | CONSERVATION EASEMENTS TO CLAIM AN INCOME TAX CREDIT104 |
---|
17 | 17 | | FOR THOSE DONATIONS IF SP ECIFIED REQUIREMENTS ARE105 |
---|
18 | 18 | | SATISFIED.106 |
---|
19 | 19 | | Bill Summary |
---|
20 | 20 | | (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does |
---|
21 | 21 | | not reflect any amendments that may be subsequently adopted. If this bill |
---|
22 | 22 | | passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that |
---|
23 | 23 | | applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at |
---|
24 | 24 | | http://leg.colorado.gov |
---|
25 | 25 | | .) |
---|
26 | 26 | | The bill creates a new state income tax credit (new credit) for |
---|
27 | 27 | | SENATE SPONSORSHIP |
---|
28 | 28 | | Simpson and Winter, |
---|
29 | 29 | | HOUSE SPONSORSHIP |
---|
30 | 30 | | (None), |
---|
31 | 31 | | Shading denotes HOUSE amendment. Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment. |
---|
32 | 32 | | Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing statute. |
---|
33 | 33 | | Dashes through the words indicate deletions from existing statute. certain taxpayers who were denied state income tax credits for |
---|
34 | 34 | | conservation easements donated between 2000 and 2013 (original credit) |
---|
35 | 35 | | if the federal internal revenue service allowed a federal income tax |
---|
36 | 36 | | deduction for the same donation. A donation is eligible for the new credit |
---|
37 | 37 | | only if the land subject to the donated conservation easement for which |
---|
38 | 38 | | the original credits were disallowed was owned by the landowner, a |
---|
39 | 39 | | family member of the landowner, or a trust or other legal entity controlled |
---|
40 | 40 | | by the landowner or one or more members of the family of the landowner |
---|
41 | 41 | | for not less than 3 consecutive years prior to the date of the donation. |
---|
42 | 42 | | The amount of the new credit is based upon the amount of the |
---|
43 | 43 | | original credit that could have been claimed at the time of the original |
---|
44 | 44 | | donation based upon the value of the donation accepted by the internal |
---|
45 | 45 | | revenue service; except that the fair market value of the land used to |
---|
46 | 46 | | calculate the value of the new credit cannot exceed 250% of the donor's |
---|
47 | 47 | | cost basis in the land subject to the donated conservation easement. The |
---|
48 | 48 | | amount of the new credit is reduced by any amount that was allowed to |
---|
49 | 49 | | be claimed against Colorado income tax or otherwise reinstated to the |
---|
50 | 50 | | claimant of the original credit. The new credit is not refundable but may |
---|
51 | 51 | | be carried forward or transferred in the same manner as the original |
---|
52 | 52 | | credit. The department of revenue is required to make information about |
---|
53 | 53 | | the new credit available online. |
---|
54 | 54 | | The bill establishes a process for applying to the division of |
---|
55 | 55 | | conservation to claim the new credit. If the original credit that was denied |
---|
56 | 56 | | was transferred to another taxpayer as transferee, the bill provides a |
---|
57 | 57 | | process for all parties to the transaction to submit a mutual application to |
---|
58 | 58 | | claim the new credit or, if there is objection, an ombudsman process to |
---|
59 | 59 | | resolve disputes about the distribution of the credit. |
---|
60 | 60 | | Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:1 |
---|
61 | 61 | | SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, add 39-22-522.7 as2 |
---|
62 | 62 | | follows:3 |
---|
63 | 63 | | 39-22-522.7. Conservation easement tax credits - credit for4 |
---|
64 | 64 | | previously denied claims - rules - legislative declaration - intent -5 |
---|
65 | 65 | | definition. (1) T |
---|
66 | 66 | | HE GENERAL ASSEMBLY HEREBY FINDS AND DECLARES6 |
---|
67 | 67 | | THAT:7 |
---|
68 | 68 | | (a) I |
---|
69 | 69 | | T IS THE INTENT OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO PROVIDE8 |
---|
70 | 70 | | RELIEF THAT WILL REPAIR THE HARM CAUSED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF9 |
---|
71 | 71 | | REVENUE'S DISALLOWANCE OF COLORADO CONSERVATION EASEMENT TAX10 |
---|
72 | 72 | | SB22-119-2- CREDITS TO LANDOWNERS WHO IN GOOD FAITH , SUBJECT TO SUBSECTION1 |
---|
73 | 73 | | (6) |
---|
74 | 74 | | OF THIS SECTION, CONVEYED CONSERVATION EASEMENTS TO2 |
---|
75 | 75 | | QUALIFIED CONSERVATION EASEMENT HOLDERS BETWEEN JANUARY 1,3 |
---|
76 | 76 | | 2000, |
---|
77 | 77 | | AND DECEMBER 31, 2013;4 |
---|
78 | 78 | | (b) S |
---|
79 | 79 | | TATE REPRESENTATIVE KIMMI LEWIS FROM HOUSE DISTRICT5 |
---|
80 | 80 | | 64, |
---|
81 | 81 | | WHO PASSED AWAY IN DECEMBER 2019, WORKED TIRELESSLY DURING6 |
---|
82 | 82 | | HER CAREER AS A LEGISLATOR TO PROVIDE HELP TO LANDOWNERS WHO7 |
---|
83 | 83 | | HAD CONSERVATION EASEMENT CREDITS ARBITRARILY DISALLOWED ; AND8 |
---|
84 | 84 | | (c) R |
---|
85 | 85 | | ESOLUTION OF THIS HARM BY ALLOWING A LANDOWNER TO9 |
---|
86 | 86 | | CLAIM A TAX CREDIT, OR PURSUE EXTINGUISHMENT, FOR A CONSERVATION10 |
---|
87 | 87 | | EASEMENT DONATION THAT WAS ACCEPTED BY THE FEDERAL INTERNAL11 |
---|
88 | 88 | | REVENUE SERVICE AND CONVEYED IN GOOD FAITH SUBJECT TO12 |
---|
89 | 89 | | SUBSECTION (5) OF THIS SECTION, BUT ULTIMATELY DENIED BY THE STATE,13 |
---|
90 | 90 | | WILL END THE NEARLY TWO-DECADES-LONG CONFLICT OVER COLORADO'S14 |
---|
91 | 91 | | CONSERVATION EASEMENT TAX CREDIT PROGRAM , RESTORE THE15 |
---|
92 | 92 | | INTEGRITY OF THE PROGRAM , AND ALLOW THE PROGRAM TO MOVE16 |
---|
93 | 93 | | FORWARD TO CONTINUE THE GOOD WORK OF CONSERVING COLORADO'S17 |
---|
94 | 94 | | INCREASINGLY LIMITED OPEN SPACE AND NATURAL RESOURCES .18 |
---|
95 | 95 | | (2) N |
---|
96 | 96 | | OTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW AND19 |
---|
97 | 97 | | SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND LIMITATIONS SET FORTH IN20 |
---|
98 | 98 | | SUBSECTION (3) OF THIS SECTION, A LANDOWNER SHALL BE ALLOWED TO21 |
---|
99 | 99 | | CLAIM A TAX CREDIT WITH RESPECT TO THE INCOME TAXES IMPOSED BY22 |
---|
100 | 100 | | THIS ARTICLE 22 FOR EACH PERPETUAL CONSERVATION EASEMENT IN23 |
---|
101 | 101 | | GROSS DONATED IN GOOD FAITH BETWEEN JANUARY 1, 2000, AND24 |
---|
102 | 102 | | D |
---|
103 | 103 | | ECEMBER 31, 2013, FOR WHICH A TAX CREDIT WAS CLAIMED PURSUANT25 |
---|
104 | 104 | | TO SECTION 39-22-522 AND WAS DENIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART IF A26 |
---|
105 | 105 | | FEDERAL CONSERVATION EASEMENT TAX DEDUCTION WAS ACCEPTED BY27 |
---|
106 | 106 | | SB22-119 |
---|
107 | 107 | | -3- THE FEDERAL INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE FOR THE SAME DONATION .1 |
---|
108 | 108 | | (3) (a) A |
---|
109 | 109 | | DONATION OF A PERPETUAL CONSERVATION EASEMENT2 |
---|
110 | 110 | | IN GROSS IS ELIGIBLE FOR THE CREDIT ALLOWED BY SUBSECTION (2) OF3 |
---|
111 | 111 | | THIS SECTION ONLY IF THE LAND SUBJECT TO THE PERPETUAL4 |
---|
112 | 112 | | CONSERVATION EASEMENT IN GROSS FOR WHICH THE INITIAL CREDITS5 |
---|
113 | 113 | | WERE DISALLOWED WAS OWNED BY THE LANDOWNER , A FAMILY MEMBER6 |
---|
114 | 114 | | OF THE LANDOWNER, OR A TRUST OR OTHER LEGAL ENTITY CONTROLLED7 |
---|
115 | 115 | | BY THE LANDOWNER OR ONE OR MORE MEMBERS OF THE FAMILY OF THE8 |
---|
116 | 116 | | LANDOWNER FOR NOT LESS THAN THREE CONSECUTIVE YEARS PRIOR TO9 |
---|
117 | 117 | | THE DATE OF THE DONATION OF THE PERPETUAL CONSERVATION10 |
---|
118 | 118 | | EASEMENT IN GROSS.11 |
---|
119 | 119 | | (b) T |
---|
120 | 120 | | HE AMOUNT OF THE CREDIT ALLOWED FOR EACH DONATION12 |
---|
121 | 121 | | SHALL BE EQUAL TO THE FULL AMOUNT OF THE CREDIT THAT COULD HAVE13 |
---|
122 | 122 | | BEEN CLAIMED FOR THE DONATION , BASED ON THE FAIR MARKET VALUE14 |
---|
123 | 123 | | DETERMINED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (3)(c) OF THIS SECTION,15 |
---|
124 | 124 | | PURSUANT TO THE APPLICABLE LAW IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF THE16 |
---|
125 | 125 | | DONATION.17 |
---|
126 | 126 | | (c) T |
---|
127 | 127 | | HE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF THE DONATION SHALL BE THE18 |
---|
128 | 128 | | LESSER OF:19 |
---|
129 | 129 | | (I) T |
---|
130 | 130 | | HE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT20 |
---|
131 | 131 | | CONTRIBUTION ACCEPTED BY THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE AS21 |
---|
132 | 132 | | REFLECTED ON THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX FORM 8283 OR AMENDED BY A22 |
---|
133 | 133 | | SUBSEQUENT FEDERAL APPEAL PROCESS , FEDERAL COURT, OR UNITED23 |
---|
134 | 134 | | S |
---|
135 | 135 | | TATES TAX COURT RULING; OR24 |
---|
136 | 136 | | (II) I |
---|
137 | 137 | | F THE DONATED REAL PROPERTY WAS PURCHASED BY THE25 |
---|
138 | 138 | | DONOR, TWO HUNDRED FIFTY PERCENT OF THE DONOR 'S COST BASIS.26 |
---|
139 | 139 | | (d) T |
---|
140 | 140 | | HE AMOUNT OF ANY CREDIT ALLOWED PURSUANT TO THIS27 |
---|
141 | 141 | | SB22-119 |
---|
142 | 142 | | -4- SECTION SHALL BE DECREASED BY ANY AMOUNT OF CREDIT THAT WAS1 |
---|
143 | 143 | | OTHERWISE ALLOWED TO BE CLAIMED AGAINST THE TAXES IMPOSED BY2 |
---|
144 | 144 | | THIS ARTICLE 22 OR OTHERWISE REINSTATED, AND BY ANY AMOUNT THAT3 |
---|
145 | 145 | | WAS REIMBURSED OR OTHERWISE ALLOWED TO THE TRANSFEREE AS A4 |
---|
146 | 146 | | RESULT OF A SETTLEMENT, LITIGATION, OR OTHER MEANS THAT PROVIDED5 |
---|
147 | 147 | | COMPENSATION TO THE TRANSFEREE .6 |
---|
148 | 148 | | (4) B |
---|
149 | 149 | | Y AUGUST 15, 2022, THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE SHALL7 |
---|
150 | 150 | | MAKE READILY AVAILABLE ONLINE FOR ANY TAXPAYER WHO HAD A TAX8 |
---|
151 | 151 | | CREDIT DENIED IN WHOLE OR IN PART FOR A CONSERVATION EASEMENT9 |
---|
152 | 152 | | DONATED BETWEEN JANUARY 1, 2000, AND DECEMBER 31, 2013,10 |
---|
153 | 153 | | INFORMATION THAT THE TAXPAYER MAY BE ELIGIBLE TO APPLY FOR A11 |
---|
154 | 154 | | CREDIT PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION . THE INFORMATION MUST INCLUDE12 |
---|
155 | 155 | | THE APPLICATION FORM AND PROCESS CREATED BY THE DIVISION13 |
---|
156 | 156 | | PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (5) OF THIS SECTION . THE ONLINE14 |
---|
157 | 157 | | INFORMATION MUST OUTLINE THE PROCESS FOR APPLYING FOR A CREDIT15 |
---|
158 | 158 | | AND THE CRITERIA USED TO DETERMI NE THE AMOUNT OF THE CREDIT .16 |
---|
159 | 159 | | (5) A |
---|
160 | 160 | | TAXPAYER MUST SUBMIT A CLAIM FOR A CREDIT TO THE17 |
---|
161 | 161 | | DIVISION OF CONSERVATION IN THE DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY18 |
---|
162 | 162 | | AGENCIES NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 30, 2023. THE CLAIM MUST BE19 |
---|
163 | 163 | | SUBMITTED USING A FORM AND PROCESS CREATED BY THE DIVISION AND20 |
---|
164 | 164 | | IN COORDINATION WITH THE WORKING GROUP CONVENED IN ACCOR DANCE21 |
---|
165 | 165 | | WITH SECTION 12-15-106 (14.5). THE CLAIM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY22 |
---|
166 | 166 | | THE FOLLOWING:23 |
---|
167 | 167 | | (a) A |
---|
168 | 168 | | COPY OF THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX FORM 8283 USED TO24 |
---|
169 | 169 | | SUBSTANTIATE A FEDERAL DEDUCTION FOR THE DONATED CONSERVATION25 |
---|
170 | 170 | | EASEMENT;26 |
---|
171 | 171 | | (b) I |
---|
172 | 172 | | F THE ORIGINAL AMOUNT OF DEDUCTION CLAIMED ON THE27 |
---|
173 | 173 | | SB22-119 |
---|
174 | 174 | | -5- FEDERAL INCOME TAX FORM 8283 WAS ADJUSTED, DOCUMENTATION1 |
---|
175 | 175 | | CONFIRMING THE AMOUNT ULTIMATELY ALLOWED BY THE INTERNAL2 |
---|
176 | 176 | | REVENUE SERVICE, A FEDERAL COURT, OR THE UNITED STATES TAX COURT3 |
---|
177 | 177 | | AND CLAIMED BY MEANS OF AN ADJUSTED FEDERAL TAX RETURN4 |
---|
178 | 178 | | ACCEPTED BY THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE ; AND5 |
---|
179 | 179 | | (c) D |
---|
180 | 180 | | OCUMENTATION CONFIRMING SETTLEMENT OF THE CREDIT6 |
---|
181 | 181 | | AMOUNT ALLOWED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE .7 |
---|
182 | 182 | | (6) A |
---|
183 | 183 | | S USED IN THIS SECTION, "GOOD FAITH" MEANS THAT A8 |
---|
184 | 184 | | PERSON OR ENTITY HONESTLY RELIED UPON A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL TO9 |
---|
185 | 185 | | ESTABLISH THE VALUE OF A CONSERVATION EASEMENT , DID NOT10 |
---|
186 | 186 | | KNOWINGLY MISREPRESENT THE VALUE OF THE CONSERVATION11 |
---|
187 | 187 | | EASEMENT, AND FOLLOWED THE APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS SET12 |
---|
188 | 188 | | FORTH IN STATUTE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE RULES , AND THE FEDERAL13 |
---|
189 | 189 | | INTERNAL REVENUE CODE AND FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY14 |
---|
190 | 190 | | REGULATIONS IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF THE CONVEYANCE OF THE15 |
---|
191 | 191 | | CONSERVATION EASEMENT .16 |
---|
192 | 192 | | (7) I |
---|
193 | 193 | | F A PERSON ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE A CREDIT PURSUANT TO THIS17 |
---|
194 | 194 | | SECTION IS NO LONGER LIVING, THE CREDIT MAY BE CLAIMED BY THE18 |
---|
195 | 195 | | APPROPRIATE ESTATE, HEIR, SUCCESSOR, OR ASSIGNEE.19 |
---|
196 | 196 | | (8) I |
---|
197 | 197 | | F MORE THAN ONE PERSON OR ENTITY HAS A CLAIM TO A20 |
---|
198 | 198 | | CREDIT RELATED TO A PARTICULAR DONATION OF A CONSERVATION21 |
---|
199 | 199 | | EASEMENT, CLAIMANTS MAY WORK TOGETHER TO COORDINATE THE22 |
---|
200 | 200 | | APPROPRIATE DISTRIBUTION OF CREDITS.23 |
---|
201 | 201 | | (9) I |
---|
202 | 202 | | F A TAXPAYER TRANSFERRED ALL OR A PORTION OF A TAX24 |
---|
203 | 203 | | CREDIT FOR A CONSERVATION EASEMENT DONATION THAT QUALIFIES FOR25 |
---|
204 | 204 | | A CREDIT PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION TO ANOTHER TAXPAYER AS26 |
---|
205 | 205 | | TRANSFEREE PURSUANT TO SECTION 39-22-522 (7), THEN THE TRANSFEREE27 |
---|
206 | 206 | | SB22-119 |
---|
207 | 207 | | -6- MAY CLAIM A CREDIT PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION . THE TRANSFEROR AND1 |
---|
208 | 208 | | ANY TRANSFEREES MAY SUBMIT CLAIMS FOR CREDITS PURSUANT TO THIS2 |
---|
209 | 209 | | SECTION INDIVIDUALLY OR MUTUALLY AS A GROUP IF THEY AGREE UPON3 |
---|
210 | 210 | | THE TERMS FOR DIVIDING THE CREDIT . APPLICANTS MUST ATTEMPT TO4 |
---|
211 | 211 | | NOTIFY ANY OTHER TAXPAYER OR TRANSFEREE THAT WAS A PARTY TO THE5 |
---|
212 | 212 | | TRANSFER THAT AN APPLICATION IS BEING MADE TO CLAIM A CREDIT6 |
---|
213 | 213 | | PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION. ANY PARTY WHO RECEIVES SUCH NOTICE HAS7 |
---|
214 | 214 | | NINETY DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF THE NOTICE TO FILE AN OBJECTION TO THE8 |
---|
215 | 215 | | CLAIM FOR THE CREDIT. AN OBJECTION SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN THE FORM9 |
---|
216 | 216 | | OF AN APPLICATION FOR A CREDIT AND SHALL SET FORTH THE PROPOSED10 |
---|
217 | 217 | | ALTERNATIVE AMOUNT OR DISTRIBUTION OF THE CREDIT . THE AMOUNT OF11 |
---|
218 | 218 | | COMPENSATION PROVIDED TO A TRANSFEREE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE12 |
---|
219 | 219 | | AMOUNT PAID BY THE TRANSFEREE FOR THE CREDIT , LESS ANY AMOUNT13 |
---|
220 | 220 | | THAT WAS REINSTATED, REIMBURSED, OR OTHERWISE ALLOWED TO THE14 |
---|
221 | 221 | | TRANSFEREE AS A RESULT OF A SETTLEMENT , LITIGATION, OR OTHER15 |
---|
222 | 222 | | MEANS THAT PROVIDED COMPENSATION TO THE TRANSFEREE UNLESS16 |
---|
223 | 223 | | OTHERWISE MUTUALLY AGREED UPON BY THE PARTIES .17 |
---|
224 | 224 | | (10) I |
---|
225 | 225 | | F AN OBJECTION TO A CLAIM FOR A CREDIT IS FILED18 |
---|
226 | 226 | | PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (9) OF THIS SECTION, THE DIVISION OF19 |
---|
227 | 227 | | CONSERVATION SHALL REFER THE MATTER TO THE OMBUDSMAN20 |
---|
228 | 228 | | DESIGNATED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12-15-108 FOR FINAL RESOLUTION OF21 |
---|
229 | 229 | | ANY DISPUTES RELATED TO AMOUNTS TO BE ALLOWED PURSUANT TO THIS22 |
---|
230 | 230 | | SECTION.23 |
---|
231 | 231 | | (11) C |
---|
232 | 232 | | REDITS ALLOWED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION ARE NOT24 |
---|
233 | 233 | | REFUNDABLE, BUT MAY BE TRANSFERRED OR CARRIED FORWARD IN THE25 |
---|
234 | 234 | | SAME MANNER AS CREDITS ALLOWED PURSUANT TO SECTION 39-22-52226 |
---|
235 | 235 | | (4)(a) |
---|
236 | 236 | | FOR A PERIOD BEGINNING AT THE TIME OF THE ISSUANCE OF THE27 |
---|
237 | 237 | | SB22-119 |
---|
238 | 238 | | -7- CREDIT.1 |
---|
239 | 239 | | SECTION 2. In Colorado Revised Statutes, add 12-15-108 as2 |
---|
240 | 240 | | follows:3 |
---|
241 | 241 | | 12-15-108. Disputed credit claims - ombudsman. T |
---|
242 | 242 | | HE DIRECTOR4 |
---|
243 | 243 | | OF THE DIVISION SHALL DESIGNATE A PERSON TO SERVE AS AN5 |
---|
244 | 244 | | OMBUDSMAN TO MEDIATE OR OTHERWISE ASSIST CLAIMANTS OF TAX6 |
---|
245 | 245 | | CREDITS IF AN OBJECTION TO A CLAIM FOR A TAX CREDIT HAS BEEN7 |
---|
246 | 246 | | REFERRED TO THE OMBUDSMAN PURSUANT TO SECTION 39-22-522.7 (10).8 |
---|
247 | 247 | | T |
---|
248 | 248 | | HE OMBUDSMAN MAY BE AN EMPLOYEE OF THE DIVISION OR ANOTHER9 |
---|
249 | 249 | | PROFESSIONAL WITH KNOWLEDGE OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT10 |
---|
250 | 250 | | TRANSACTIONS. IF THE PARTIES ARE UNABLE TO RESOLVE THEIR11 |
---|
251 | 251 | | OBJECTIONS TO A CLAIM FOR A TAX CREDIT WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF THE12 |
---|
252 | 252 | | OMBUDSMAN, THE OMBUDSMAN MAY REFER THE MATTER TO AN13 |
---|
253 | 253 | | ARBITRATOR, AT THE EXPENSE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE , TO14 |
---|
254 | 254 | | COME TO A FINAL RESOLUTION OF THE DISPUTE. UPON FINAL RESOLUTION15 |
---|
255 | 255 | | OF THE DISPUTE, THE OMBUDSMAN SHALL NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT OF16 |
---|
256 | 256 | | REVENUE OF THE TERMS OF THE RESOLUTION AND THE DEPARTMENT OF17 |
---|
257 | 257 | | REVENUE SHALL ALLOW THE TAX CREDIT TO BE CLAIMED IN ACCORDANCE18 |
---|
258 | 258 | | WITH SUCH TERMS AND SECTION 39-22-522.7.19 |
---|
259 | 259 | | SECTION 3. Safety clause. The general assembly hereby finds,20 |
---|
260 | 260 | | determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate21 |
---|
261 | 261 | | preservation of the public peace, health, or safety.22 |
---|
262 | 262 | | SB22-119 |
---|
263 | 263 | | -8- |
---|