If enacted, SB129 would amend existing laws related to the procedures followed by the Air Quality Control Commission when it comes to setting standards and adopting emission control regulations. Specifically, it will require a notice to be issued at least sixty days before a public hearing on proposed rule changes. This requirement seeks to allow ample time for public engagement and to provide the opportunity for different stakeholders to come forward and present their comments or alternative proposals. Importantly, any alternative proposals must also include an initial economic impact analysis, emphasizing the economic aspects of environmental regulations.
Summary
Senate Bill 129 focuses on enhancing the processes surrounding the proposals made to the Air Quality Control Commission in Colorado. The bill mandates that any proposed rule changes include a detailed description of the classes of persons or businesses that will be affected by the proposed rules. This is aimed at increasing transparency and ensuring that stakeholders are informed about potential impacts on their operations. By requiring a more thorough consideration of who will be affected, the bill aims to improve the rule-making process in addressing air quality issues and regulations in the state.
Contention
While SB129 aims to strengthen public participation in environmental rule-making, it could also lead to concerns indicating an increased regulatory burden for businesses that may now need to prepare more detailed submissions. Some opponents fear that the required economic impact analyses could deter smaller businesses from engaging in the rule-making process due to the additional resources needed to comply with these requirements. Furthermore, the bill's provisions imply a shift towards a more structured and potentially restrictive approach to air quality regulation, which could be contentious among those who advocate for more flexible and adaptive environmental policies.