If enacted, SB174 would revise existing statutes concerning how regulatory entities are reviewed for their effectiveness and necessity. The intent is to streamline processes, eliminate outdated regulations, and encourage regulatory bodies to operate more efficiently for the public's benefit. It seeks not only to ensure public health and safety but also to promote transparency and inclusivity within regulatory practices, potentially making licensing and certification processes more equitable.
Summary
Senate Bill 174 addresses the criteria to be considered during a sunset review hearing for regulatory agencies in Colorado. The bill emphasizes the importance of evaluating whether a regulatory program continues to serve a valid public need and whether it has adapted to changing conditions. Additionally, it highlights the necessity of ensuring that regulations establish the least restrictive form of governmental oversight in order to protect public welfare effectively while promoting efficient agency operations.
Sentiment
The sentiment regarding SB174 appears to be generally supportive among legislative members advocating for more efficient government and regulatory practices. Proponents argue that the bill fosters necessary reforms and accountability within regulatory agencies. However, there may be concerns among some legislators or advocacy groups about the implications for oversight and the potential for reduced protections if sunset reviews are not conducted rigorously.
Contention
Notable points of contention surrounding SB174 may arise from differing views on the balance between necessary regulation and administrative burden. Critics might argue that too much emphasis on reducing regulation could compromise standards and protections for public health and safety. Additionally, there may be discussions on how inclusivity and equity are defined and measured in the context of regulatory oversight, particularly regarding past criminal history and access to licenses.