Colorado 2023 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1093

Introduced
1/19/23  
Refer
1/19/23  
Report Pass
2/8/23  
Refer
2/8/23  
Engrossed
2/17/23  
Refer
2/17/23  
Report Pass
3/13/23  
Refer
3/13/23  
Engrossed
3/31/23  
Engrossed
4/3/23  
Enrolled
4/3/23  

Caption

Higher Education Staff Sabbaticals

Impact

If enacted, this bill will enable Colorado higher education institutions to revise their sabbatical policies to place greater emphasis on detailed planning and outcomes. It outlines expectations regarding how sabbaticals will contribute to the professional growth of faculty and staff, the institution's reputation, and the overall educational quality for students. By implementing these guidelines, the intent is to foster a culture of accountability while maintaining high academic and teaching standards.

Summary

House Bill 1093 seeks to establish and revise the regulations surrounding sabbaticals for faculty and staff at state-supported institutions of higher education in Colorado. The bill emphasizes the importance of faculty and staff sabbaticals as a means to enhance their professional development while recognizing that these sabbaticals are privileges, not rights. By requiring oversight and structured reporting on sabbatical plans and outcomes, the bill aims to ensure that sabbaticals provide tangible benefits both to the institutions and to the students' educational experiences.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 1093 appears to be positive, with support likely stemming from the legislative intent to enhance educational quality through structured professional development. Advocates argue that this will contribute significantly to faculty excellence and student outcomes. However, there may be a concern among some faculty about the increased scrutiny and administrative processes involved in securing sabbaticals.

Contention

An area of contention may arise regarding the criteria for granting sabbaticals, particularly around the frequency limitations and the mandatory submission of detailed plans. Critics could argue that these requirements could deter faculty from applying due to the perceived burden of additional administrative work and the need for extensive justification. This element raises questions about maintaining faculty autonomy while balancing institutional accountability.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB850

Institutional Debt Transparency Act.

TX SB174

Relating to accountability of institutions of higher education, including educator preparation programs, and online institution resumes for public institutions of higher education.

CA AB1344

Private postsecondary education: California Private Postsecondary Act of 2009.

CA AB70

Private postsecondary education: California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009.

NJ S3566

Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.

NJ A5181

Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.

NJ A3422

Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.

CA AB3167

California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009: highly qualified private nonprofit institution.