Temporary Prohibition On Rule-making After Rule Adopted
Impact
The bill's implications are significant for many state agencies, as it aims to refine their power to adapt and change regulations within a restricted timeline. By imposing a three-year limitation, the legislation seeks to mitigate the potential for arbitrary or unforeseen regulatory changes that could adversely affect businesses and individuals subject to these rules. However, the bill does permit certain exceptions, allowing amendments under specific circumstances like compliance with federal regulations or for public health and safety needs, which maintains a degree of flexibility for agencies to respond to pressing issues.
Summary
House Bill 1148 introduces a temporary prohibition on rule-making by executive agencies. Specifically, it prohibits these agencies from amending existing rules or adopting new rules concerning the same subject matter for a period of three years following the rule's adoption. This measure is intended to provide stability and clarity within regulatory processes, allowing regulated communities to operate under defined standards without the fear of frequent rule changes that could disrupt compliance and operational planning.
Contention
The discussions surrounding HB 1148 reveal a spectrum of opinions on its potential effectiveness. Proponents argue that it enhances regulatory predictability and stability, fostering a better environment for businesses and stakeholders. Conversely, critics raise concerns about the potential risks associated with limiting agencies' ability to quickly amend regulations, particularly in response to evolving public health crises or emerging safety threats. These opposing views underscore an ongoing debate over the balance between regulatory consistency and the need for adaptability in governance.