Colorado 2023 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1250

Introduced
3/20/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Report Pass
4/12/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Engrossed
4/17/23  
Refer
4/17/23  
Report Pass
4/26/23  
Refer
4/26/23  
Engrossed
5/12/23  
Engrossed
5/15/23  
Enrolled
5/15/23  

Caption

Attorney General Jurisdiction Regulate Architects

Impact

The passage of HB 1250 modifies state laws to consolidate and clarify the enforcement powers concerning architects, which may lead to more effective regulation in the profession. It aligns the responsibilities of the Attorney General and the district attorneys, fostering cooperation and consistency in the enforcement of laws related to architects. This could result in more rigorous oversight and allow for unified legal action in cases of misconduct, thereby improving the integrity of the architecture industry in Colorado.

Summary

House Bill 1250 seeks to update the Colorado Revised Statutes to ensure that the Attorney General has concurrent jurisdiction with the relevant district attorney over the regulation of architects. This legislation aims to clarify the powers and duties of the Attorney General, specifically concerning oversight and regulation in the architectural field. By establishing this concurrent authority, the bill addresses potential ambiguities in the current statutes and streamlines enforcement related to architectural regulations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1250 appears to be generally positive, particularly among lawmakers focused on ensuring proper regulatory oversight in professional fields. Supporters argue that the bill enhances accountability and clarity within the jurisdictional structure, ultimately benefiting public interests. However, there may be some concerns regarding the implications of expanded powers for the Attorney General, particularly from critics of broad jurisdictional authority in regulatory matters.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support, points of contention may arise regarding the degree of power granted to the Attorney General in regulating architects. Critics could argue that any potential for overreach in this authority needs to be carefully monitored to ensure that the rights and practices of architects remain protected. Additionally, there could be calls for further consultation within the architectural community to address any concerns about enforcement practices that might arise from this concurrent jurisdiction.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.