Colorado 2023 Regular Session

Colorado Senate Bill SB142

Introduced
2/6/23  
Refer
2/6/23  
Report Pass
2/7/23  
Refer
2/7/23  
Engrossed
2/9/23  
Refer
2/9/23  
Report Pass
2/14/23  
Refer
2/14/23  
Engrossed
2/28/23  
Engrossed
2/28/23  
Enrolled
2/28/23  

Caption

Information Technology Project Appropriation Process

Impact

The enactment of SB142 would have a significant impact on state budgetary processes, particularly concerning how funds are allocated to information technology projects. It mandates that any funds appropriated from the information technology capital account must be clearly outlined in a single budget line item, promoting transparency and accountability in how taxpayer money is utilized. This structured approach aims to prevent misallocation and ensure that IT projects are properly funded without delay.

Summary

Senate Bill 142, titled 'Information Technology Project Appropriation Process', is designed to streamline the funding process for information technology projects proposed by certain state entities in Colorado. This bill establishes a dedicated information technology capital account within the capital construction fund, allowing for more efficient appropriations for IT projects. The goal is to ensure that necessary funding is readily available for technological advancements that serve the state’s interests.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB142 appears to be positive among legislators who support increased efficiency in government operations. Supporters argue that the bill will modernize how state investments are made in technology, ultimately benefiting public services. However, there may be some concerns regarding dependency on a centralized funding mechanism, which could potentially limit flexibility for state agencies in urgent situations.

Contention

Despite the overall supportive sentiment, there are concerns about the implications of creating a centralized capital account for IT projects. Some opponents may worry that this could reduce agency autonomy and lead to bureaucratic red tape, where agencies must navigate additional layers of approval when seeking funding for essential projects. The debate around SB142 reflects broader discussions in Colorado regarding the balance between state oversight and agency autonomy in managing technological resources.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CO SB224

Mitigate Future State Technology Debt

AZ HB2265

Appropriations; community colleges

CA AB2812

Data storage and protection standards: local agencies.

HI HB448

Relating To Technology Enablement.

HI SB1297

Relating To The Hawaii Technology Development Corporation.

HI HB999

Relating To The Hawaii Technology Development Corporation.

CA AB1576

Secretary of Government Operations: working group: technology.

AZ HB2017

Community colleges; expenditure limitation