Colorado 2024 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1033

Introduced
1/10/24  
Introduced
1/10/24  
Report Pass
2/12/24  
Refer
1/10/24  
Report Pass
2/12/24  
Engrossed
2/20/24  
Refer
2/12/24  
Engrossed
2/20/24  
Report Pass
3/19/24  
Refer
2/20/24  
Report Pass
3/19/24  
Enrolled
3/26/24  
Refer
3/19/24  
Engrossed
4/8/24  
Enrolled
3/26/24  
Engrossed
4/9/24  
Engrossed
4/8/24  
Engrossed
4/9/24  
Enrolled
4/10/24  
Passed
4/11/24  
Enrolled
4/10/24  

Caption

Emergency Management Plan Individuals with Animals

Impact

This bill significantly impacts existing emergency management statutes by emphasizing the integration of animal welfare into emergency response protocols. It mandates that local jurisdictions develop plans addressing how individuals with animals will be supported during crisis situations, thereby enhancing public safety and emergency preparedness. The legislation seeks to improve responses to emergencies by providing clear guidelines for both the care of animals and the needs of their owners.

Summary

House Bill 1033 addresses the needs of individuals with animals during emergencies in Colorado. The bill encourages local and interjurisdictional emergency management plans to include provisions for the evacuation, shelter, and transportation of individuals with animals. By January 1, 2025, local governments are required to consider these needs when crafting their emergency plans, ensuring that at least one emergency shelter can accommodate both individuals and their animals.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1033 appears to be generally positive among proponents who believe the bill will lead to better emergency preparedness and inclusivity for individuals with disabilities and their service animals. Advocates argue that this bill underscores the importance of recognizing the bond between individuals and their animals, especially in times of crisis. However, there may also be concerns regarding the implementation of these mandates and the resources available to local agencies.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the logistics and potential costs to local governments in complying with the additional requirements set forth by the bill. Critics may question the practicality of designating shelters and ensuring adequate training for emergency personnel in animal care within confined emergency resources. Furthermore, there is a need to ensure that the rights of individuals with service animals are upheld, requiring careful consideration during implementation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB277

Criminal procedure: search of persons.

CA AB937

Plastic products: commercial agricultural mulch film: labeling: soil biodegradable.

CA AB2632

Segregated confinement.

CA AB1464

Housing preferences.

MI SB0975

Employment security: benefits; disqualification from benefits; modify. Amends sec. 29 of 1936 (Ex Sess) PA 1 (MCL 421.29).

CA AB2564

Individual Shared Responsibility Penalty: waiver: health care service plans.

CA SB479

Termination of tenancy: no-fault just cause: natural person.

CA SB1428

Reproductive health: mifepristone and other medication.