Colorado 2024 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1055

Introduced
1/10/24  
Introduced
1/10/24  
Report Pass
2/13/24  
Refer
1/10/24  
Report Pass
2/13/24  
Report Pass
5/2/24  
Refer
2/13/24  
Report Pass
5/2/24  
Engrossed
5/3/24  
Refer
5/2/24  
Engrossed
5/3/24  
Report Pass
5/4/24  
Refer
5/3/24  
Report Pass
5/4/24  
Engrossed
5/29/24  
Refer
5/4/24  
Engrossed
5/29/24  
Engrossed
5/29/24  
Passed
6/4/24  
Enrolled
5/29/24  

Caption

Child Passenger Safety & Education

Impact

The legislation introduces clear requirements for child restraint systems based on a child's age, weight, and height. Notably, it mandates that children under nine years of age must be properly secured in child restraint systems, while also stipulating specific conditions for children of different age groups, including those as young as two years old needing to be in rear-facing seats if applicable. By modernizing these statutes, HB1055 aims to enhance compliance with best safety practices, thereby potentially reducing the incidence of injuries in the event of a crash.

Summary

House Bill 1055, titled 'Child Passenger Safety & Education', aims to update and strengthen the existing child passenger safety laws in Colorado. The bill recognizes that children continue to be at significant risk while traveling in motor vehicles, as evidenced by traffic safety statistics showing fatalities and injuries among young children due to improper restraint. Given that the current laws have not been modified in over a decade, the legislation seeks to align Colorado with updated national safety standards and improve safety protocols for child passengers.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB1055 appears to be favorable among safety advocates and family organizations, who argue that updating child restraint laws reflects a necessary step toward better protecting children in motor vehicles. Supporters emphasize the importance of child safety in vehicular settings and how appropriate restraints substantially decrease the likelihood of severe injuries. However, some members of the legislature may express reservations regarding the implications of stringent regulations and their enforcement on families and caregivers.

Contention

While there is general support for the bill, there might be contention regarding the practicality and scope of its implementation. Concerns could arise about how families will adapt to the stricter requirements, particularly regarding the costs associated with purchasing new restraint systems and ensuring compliance. Additionally, discussions may focus on how to effectively educate the public about the new regulations to safeguard children, which has been highlighted as a critical element of the bill's intent.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1043

Short-term residential therapeutic programs: dashboard: seclusion or behavioral restraints.

AZ HB2543

Group foster homes; staffing requirement

CA AB1798

Schoolbuses: passenger restraint systems.

CT SB00927

An Act Concerning Seclusion And Restraint In Schools.

CA SCR77

Child Passenger Safety Week.

CA SCR65

Child Passenger Safety Week.

VT H0030

An act relating to the use of seclusion and restraint on children and youth in the custody of the Department for Children and Families

MI SB0227

Children: child care; emergency safety intervention in a children's therapeutic group home; modify conditions for. Amends secs. 1, 2b & 2c of 1973 PA 116 (MCL 722.111 et seq.).