Colorado 2024 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1074

Introduced
1/10/24  
Introduced
1/10/24  
Report Pass
1/30/24  
Refer
1/10/24  
Report Pass
1/30/24  
Engrossed
2/13/24  
Refer
1/30/24  
Engrossed
2/13/24  
Report Pass
3/18/24  
Refer
2/13/24  
Report Pass
3/18/24  
Engrossed
4/8/24  
Refer
3/18/24  
Engrossed
4/9/24  
Engrossed
4/8/24  
Engrossed
4/9/24  
Enrolled
4/10/24  
Passed
4/17/24  
Enrolled
4/10/24  

Caption

Aggravated Cruelty to Law Enforcement Animals

Impact

The legislative measure is positioned to strengthen the legal framework surrounding the treatment of animals utilized by law enforcement. The amendments to Colorado Revised Statutes under this bill will facilitate harsher punishments, including mandatory minimum fines for repeated offenders and the requirement for restitution to agencies for veterinary care or replacement of an animal that has been harmed. This aligns with a broader movement toward enhanced animal welfare legislation and reflects societal values that prioritize the humane treatment of working animals.

Summary

House Bill 1074, titled 'Aggravated Cruelty to Law Enforcement Animals', aims to establish stricter penalties for cruelty and aggravated cruelty towards law enforcement animals, specifically certified working dogs and police horses. The bill expands the definition of aggravated cruelty to include actions resulting in serious bodily harm or death to these animals, regardless of whether they are on duty. This represents a significant shift in how the law recognizes and protects law enforcement animals in Colorado.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding HB1074 appears largely positive among proponents, who view the bill as a necessary protective measure for law enforcement animals that perform crucial roles in public safety. Supporters argue that these animals warrant the same protections as other service animals due to their invaluable contributions to law enforcement efforts. However, there may be concerns about the implications for individual rights in cases involving the defense of animals and potential overreach in animal cruelty laws.

Contention

Some points of contention regarding the bill may revolve around the interpretation of what constitutes justified use of force in the context of law enforcement animal interactions. Critics could argue that the expanded definitions and penalties might lead to disproportionate legal consequences for individuals acting in defense of their pets or in situations involving perceived excesses of force by law enforcement animals. The continued balancing of animal rights with individual freedoms and responsibilities will be a key area of discussion as the bill moves through the legislative process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1081

After School Education and Safety Program: funding: authorized purposes.

CA AB1051

Education finance: state special schools and diagnostic centers.

CA SB1203

School safety: lockdown training.

CA SB527

Education finance: local control funding formula: home-to-school transportation: cost-of-living adjustment.

CA AB2434

County government: allocation of state funds.

CA AB898

Criminal records: automatic conviction record relief.

NJ S1199

Creates new $100 assessment for convictions of certain sexual offenses to fund counseling for victims and their families; establishes Sexual Offender Victim Counseling Fund.

CA AB1391

Education finance: transitional kindergarten: funding for basic aid school districts and necessary small schools.