Colorado 2024 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1194

Introduced
2/2/24  
Introduced
2/2/24  
Report Pass
2/6/24  
Refer
2/2/24  
Report Pass
2/6/24  
Engrossed
2/9/24  
Refer
2/6/24  
Engrossed
2/9/24  
Report Pass
2/13/24  
Refer
2/9/24  
Report Pass
2/13/24  
Engrossed
2/26/24  
Refer
2/13/24  
Engrossed
2/27/24  
Engrossed
2/26/24  
Engrossed
2/27/24  
Passed
3/6/24  
Enrolled
2/27/24  

Caption

Department of Natural Resources Supplemental

Impact

The impact of HB 1194 on state laws revolves around the allocation of state funds to key conservation efforts and the management of natural resources. The bill seeks to enhance programs related to wildlife management and conservation, fostering a more robust framework for overseeing the ecological balance in Colorado. The appropriations will support initiatives like the reintroduction of gray wolves, preservation of wildlife habitats, and enhancement of state parks, all essential for maintaining the state's environmental integrity.

Summary

House Bill 1194 is titled 'Department of Natural Resources Supplemental' and primarily focuses on appropriations for various programs under the Department of Natural Resources. The bill aims to allocate funding across several divisions, including Parks and Wildlife, Oil and Gas Conservation, and Water Conservation. A significant portion of the appropriations is designated for wildlife operations, oil and gas monitoring, and outdoor recreation, reflecting the state's commitment to managing its natural resources effectively.

Sentiment

The sentiment among legislators appears to be generally positive, with support for the bill stemming from a recognition of the importance of natural resource management. Lawmakers acknowledge the necessity of funding these sectors to safeguard wildlife habitats and support recreational activities. However, concerns were raised regarding the effectiveness of appropriations and the need for accountability in spending, indicating a cautious optimism as the bill progresses through the legislative process.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to HB 1194 include debates over specific funding allocations, particularly for programs that some legislators view as less critical. Critics question whether certain initiatives, such as allocations for recreational programs, merit prioritization over pressing ecological concerns. Furthermore, discussions around the management of oil and gas-related funds highlight the delicate balance between resource extraction and environmental stewardship, underscoring the complexities within the appropriations process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CO HB1177

Department of Natural Resources Supplemental

CO SB102

Department of Natural Resources Supplemental

CO SB126

Department of Natural Resources Supplemental

CO SB129

Department of Public Safety Supplemental