Colorado 2024 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1277

Introduced
2/13/24  
Introduced
2/13/24  
Report Pass
2/27/24  
Refer
2/13/24  
Report Pass
2/27/24  
Engrossed
3/6/24  
Refer
2/27/24  
Engrossed
3/6/24  
Report Pass
3/21/24  
Refer
3/6/24  
Report Pass
3/21/24  
Engrossed
4/8/24  
Refer
3/21/24  
Engrossed
4/9/24  
Engrossed
4/8/24  
Engrossed
4/9/24  
Enrolled
4/10/24  
Passed
4/19/24  
Enrolled
4/10/24  

Caption

Sunset Youth Restraint & Seclusion Working Group

Impact

The reauthorization of the Youth Restraint and Seclusion Working Group is significant, as it allows for continued evaluation of restraint and seclusion practices in youth services. This could lead to improved standards and regulations aimed at ensuring the safety and well-being of youth within these systems. Moreover, it emphasizes a commitment to reviewing existing practices and making recommendations based on current research and best practices.

Summary

House Bill 1277 aims to continue the operations of the Youth Restraint and Seclusion Working Group within the Division of Youth Services in Colorado. This bill responds to recommendations made in the 2023 sunset report by the Department of Regulatory Agencies and seeks to prevent the automatic repeal of the working group, originally scheduled for September 1, 2024. By extending the group’s existence, the bill intends to ensure ongoing review and guidance on best practices regarding youth restraint and seclusion in youth services settings.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1277 appears to be supportive among members who advocate for child welfare and effective governance in youth services. Proponents argue that ongoing oversight through the working group will enhance accountability and promote safer environments for youth. Conversely, there may be some contention regarding the effectiveness and necessity of continued state oversight versus local control in implementing these practices, although explicit opposition was not extensively documented in the discussions.

Contention

While the bill does not present significant points of contention based on the available documentation, it does bring to light the broader debate about the role of state advisory committees in regulating practices at the local level. There might be differing opinions regarding the balance of state oversight versus the ability of local entities to develop and implement their own policies regarding youth restraint and seclusion, but detailed discussions on these aspects were limited in the retrieved content.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.