Colorado Senate Bill SB013

Colorado 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/10/24
• Report Pass: 2/5/24
• Refer: 1/10/24
• Report Pass: 5/1/24
• Refer: 2/5/24
• Refer: 5/1/24
• Engrossed: 5/2/24
• Report Pass: 5/4/24
• Refer: 5/2/24
• Report Pass: 5/7/24
• Refer: 5/4/24
• Refer: 5/7/24
• Engrossed: 5/14/24
• Enrolled: 5/15/24
• Passed: 6/5/24

Caption

District Attorneys' Salaries

Impact

This legislation impacts local government financing and judicial compensation by significantly raising the minimum salaries for district attorneys and their assistants, which could lead to increased budget allocations from both state and county revenues. The new salary structures are aimed at attracting and retaining qualified attorneys in public service roles by offering competitive remuneration while also reflecting the responsibilities these positions entail in administering justice effectively.

Summary

Senate Bill 013 proposes amendments to the compensation structure for district attorneys and assistant district attorneys in Colorado. The bill mandates that starting July 1, 2026, the salary of a district attorney in each judicial district must not be less than that of a full-time district court judge at the beginning of their term. It also establishes that assistant district attorneys must be compensated at least at the level of a full-time county court judge, ensuring a baseline for compensatory alignment against judges’ salaries.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB013 has shown strong legislative support, as indicated by the voting history that revealed a substantial majority in favor of the bill, with only a few dissenting votes. Proponents argue that fair compensation is essential for maintaining the integrity and effectiveness of the judicial system, suggesting that well-paid district attorneys can lead to improved public trust and satisfaction in legal processes. Conversely, some concerns have been raised regarding the financial implications on county budgets and the sustainability of such increases over time.

Contention

Notably, opposition to the bill stems primarily from concerns about financial repercussions for smaller counties that may struggle to accommodate increased salary mandates within their budgets. Critics fear that it may place undue financial pressure on these local governments while still ensuring compliance with state directives. The debate touches upon broader themes of resource allocation, fiscal responsibility, and the value of public service in the legal sector.