Colorado 2024 Regular Session

Colorado Senate Bill SB099

Introduced
1/24/24  
Introduced
1/24/24  
Report Pass
2/12/24  
Refer
1/24/24  
Report Pass
2/12/24  
Engrossed
2/16/24  
Refer
2/12/24  
Engrossed
2/16/24  
Report Pass
3/18/24  
Refer
2/16/24  
Report Pass
3/18/24  
Enrolled
3/26/24  
Refer
3/18/24  
Engrossed
4/4/24  
Enrolled
3/26/24  
Engrossed
4/4/24  
Engrossed
4/4/24  
Passed
4/11/24  
Enrolled
4/4/24  

Caption

Public Employees' Retirement Association Employment after Retirement for Rural Schools

Impact

The bill modifies current statutes related to the Public Employees' Retirement Association (PERA) to establish provisions for retired public employees to maintain their benefits while being reemployed in designated roles in rural school districts. The goal is to alleviate staffing shortages that have been exacerbated by the retirement of many seasoned educators. By setting clear guidelines for how and when retirees can be hired without penalty to their benefits, the bill seeks to strengthen the sustainability of educational services in these communities, potentially increasing both the quality of education and job security for returning employees.

Summary

Senate Bill 099, titled 'Public Employees' Retirement Association Employment after Retirement for Rural Schools', addresses the employment of service retirees specifically within rural school districts in Colorado. The primary focus of this bill is to allow certain retirees who have previously served as superintendents, principals, teachers, school bus drivers, school food services cooks, school nurses, or paraprofessionals, to return to work without a reduction in their retirement benefits if they meet specific conditions. This is particularly crucial given the ongoing shortages of qualified educational staff in rural areas, aiming to enhance the ability of these schools to fill critical positions more efficiently.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB099 appears generally supportive among those who recognize the staffing challenges faced by rural schools. Legislators and advocates argue that allowing retirees to return to work without penalty is a pragmatic solution to shortages that threaten educational outcomes in less populated areas. However, there are concerns from certain stakeholders regarding the long-term implications for the retirement system and whether this might create an imbalance in employment opportunities for active teachers versus retirees, potentially impacting younger educators' career paths.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to the bill include debates on whether allowing retirees to return impacts younger teachers’ job prospects and whether it effectively addresses the root causes of teacher shortages rather than just implementing a 'band-aid' solution. Some critics express apprehension that it may lead to over-reliance on retired educators and the displacement of new educators entering the field. Nevertheless, supporters argue that it provides much-needed flexibility and resources for rural schools to maintain quality educational standards amidst demographic and economic challenges.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1203

School safety: lockdown training.

CA SB897

Pupil attendance: interdistrict attendance: school districts of choice.

CA AB1550

School finance: school bonds: small school district.

CA AB2336

Schoolbuses: retrofit and replacement.

CA SB1368

Pupil enrollment: Statewide Open Enrollment Act.

CA AB2488

Downtown revitalization and economic recovery financing districts: City and County of San Francisco.

CA AB185

School/Law Enforcement Partnership: stakeholder workgroup.

CA AB1744

State Air Resources Board: regulations: emissions reduction credit program.