Colorado 2024 Regular Session

Colorado Senate Bill SB205

Introduced
4/10/24  
Introduced
4/10/24  
Report Pass
4/24/24  
Refer
4/10/24  
Report Pass
4/24/24  
Engrossed
5/3/24  
Refer
4/24/24  
Engrossed
5/3/24  
Report Pass
5/4/24  
Refer
5/3/24  
Report Pass
5/4/24  
Enrolled
5/8/24  
Refer
5/4/24  
Enrolled
5/13/24  
Enrolled
5/8/24  
Enrolled
5/13/24  
Engrossed
5/13/24  
Passed
5/17/24  
Engrossed
5/13/24  

Caption

Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence

Impact

The bill, effective from February 1, 2026, has substantial implications for various sectors leveraging AI, including finance, healthcare, and employment. By instituting mandatory disclosures regarding how AI systems make consequential decisions concerning consumers, the bill aims to safeguard against potential biases and discrimination that can arise from automated processes. The Attorney General will play a key role in enforcing compliance, highlighting the state's commitment to protecting citizens from unfair practices linked to AI technologies.

Summary

Senate Bill 205, titled 'Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence', seeks to establish a regulatory framework for the deployment of high-risk artificial intelligence systems in Colorado. The bill mandates that developers and deployers of such systems implement risk management policies to mitigate the risks of algorithmic discrimination. It includes requirements for impact assessments and disclosures to consumers, aiming to increase transparency and accountability in AI technologies that significantly affect individuals' lives.

Sentiment

General sentiment regarding SB205 appears to lean positively among advocates of consumer rights and ethical technology. Supporters argue that the bill will enhance consumer protections and ensure that AI systems operate fairly and transparently. Conversely, some industry players express concern that stringent regulations may hinder innovation and the deployment of beneficial technologies, indicating a tension between regulatory oversight and technological advancement.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between necessary oversight and the potential stifling of innovation within the AI sector. Critics of the bill argue that the compliance requirements could place a significant burden on small developers, potentially leading to a slowdown in the pace of technological advancement. Additionally, discussions are expected regarding the efficiency and practicality of enforcing such wide-ranging regulations within the evolving landscape of artificial intelligence.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

VA HB2094

High-risk artificial intelligence; definitions, development, deployment, and use, civil penalties.

RI S0627

Establishes regulations to ensure the ethical development, integration, and deployment of high-risk AI systems, particularly those influencing consequential decisions.

MA H97

Protecting consumers in interactions with artificial intelligence systems

IA HSB294

A bill for an act relating to artificial intelligence, including the use of artificial intelligence to create materials related to elections and protections in interactions with artificial intelligence systems, and making penalties applicable.

VA HB2046

High-risk artificial intelligence; development, deployment, and use by public bodies, report.

NM HB60

Artificial Intelligence Act

VA SB1214

High-risk artificial intelligence; development, deployment, and use by public bodies, report.

MD SB936

Consumer Protection - High-Risk Artificial Intelligence - Developer and Deployer Requirements