Colorado 2024 Regular Session

Colorado Senate Bill SB216

Introduced
4/24/24  
Introduced
4/24/24  
Report Pass
4/29/24  
Refer
4/24/24  
Report Pass
4/29/24  
Engrossed
5/2/24  
Refer
4/29/24  
Engrossed
5/2/24  
Report Pass
5/3/24  
Refer
5/2/24  
Report Pass
5/3/24  
Enrolled
5/8/24  
Refer
5/3/24  
Engrossed
5/16/24  
Enrolled
5/8/24  
Engrossed
5/16/24  
Engrossed
5/16/24  
Passed
5/31/24  
Enrolled
5/16/24  

Caption

Standards for Decisions Regarding Library Resources

Impact

The legislation aims to protect librarians and library employees from retaliation when they refuse to remove library resources without following the stipulated review process. By clearly defining the parameters for how libraries can handle requests for reconsideration, SB216 seeks to uphold the integrity of library services as centers for public inquiry and learning, where all members of the community can access a variety of ideas and resources. The impact on state laws includes a more robust framework guiding how libraries operate and the expectations they must meet to safeguard the rights of both library patrons and staff.

Summary

Senate Bill 216 proposes new standards for public libraries in the state of Colorado, specifically regarding the acquisition, retention, display, and reconsideration of library resources. The bill establishes that public libraries must create written policies that allow for a thorough review process before any resources can be removed from the library's permanent collection. A key provision of the bill ensures that libraries adhere to principles of diversity, equity, and inclusion in their resource selection to provide a broad range of viewpoints and prevent discrimination based on various factors such as race, gender identity, and political beliefs.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB216 has been divided. Supporters emphasize the importance of maintaining diverse collections in libraries, arguing that it fosters an inclusive environment for all community members. They view the bill as a necessary response to increasing challenges against library materials that target marginalized groups. Conversely, some opponents raise concerns about the implications of such regulatory measures, fearing that they could limit the ability of communities to make decisions that best reflect their values and needs. This tension highlights the ongoing debates related to free speech, censorship, and local governance.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns regarding censorship and the balance between community standards and the rights of individuals to access information. The bill's supporters argue that establishing these standards is crucial to countering recent trends of removal and censorship of materials deemed controversial. Opponents, however, may argue that the bill restricts local autonomy and could lead to conflicts in communities where there are differing values regarding the content that libraries should provide. As such, SB216 is positioned at the intersection of regulatory measures and local control over library management.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MI HB6034

Libraries: policies and practices; public library freedom to read act; establish. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: HB 6035'24

MI HB6035

Libraries: policies and practices; district library freedom to read act; establish. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: HB 6034'24

MI HB4251

Libraries: policies and practices; district library freedom to read act; establish. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: HB 4250'25

MI HB4250

Libraries: policies and practices; public library freedom to read act; establish. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: HB 4251'25

OR SB1584

Relating to temporary total disability benefits.

OR SB991

Relating to temporary total disability benefits.

CO SB049

Content of Material in Libraries

CT SB01271

An Act Concerning School And Public Libraries.