47 | 43 | | Shading denotes HOUSE amendment. Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment. |
---|
48 | 44 | | Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law. |
---|
49 | 45 | | Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law. of an application, the local government must publish notice of the |
---|
50 | 46 | | application on the local government's website. No later than 60 days after |
---|
51 | 47 | | the local government's receipt of an application, the local government |
---|
52 | 48 | | must either approve or reject the application based on certain criteria. |
---|
53 | 49 | | Despite the criteria, a local government may approve an application if it |
---|
54 | 50 | | determines that the benefits of the covered fencing project outweigh the |
---|
55 | 51 | | harms. Also, the governing body of a local government may pass an |
---|
56 | 52 | | ordinance or resolution opting out of these requirements. |
---|
57 | 53 | | Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:1 |
---|
58 | 54 | | SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, add 29-20-112 as2 |
---|
59 | 55 | | follows:3 |
---|
60 | 56 | | 29-20-112. Local government review of certain fencing4 |
---|
61 | 57 | | projects in the Sangre de Cristo land grant lands - |
---|
62 | 58 | | requirement to opt5 |
---|
63 | 59 | | in - exemptions - definitions - legislative declaration. (1) (a) T HE6 |
---|
64 | 60 | | GENERAL ASSEMBLY FINDS AND DETERMINES THAT :7 |
---|
65 | 61 | | (I) T |
---|
66 | 62 | | HE SANGRE DE CRISTO LAND GRANT LANDS ARE A PLACE OF8 |
---|
67 | 63 | | RICH HISTORY AND TRADITION AND CONTAIN AN ABUNDANCE OF WILDLIFE9 |
---|
68 | 64 | | AND VEGETATION THAT ARE OF GREAT SIGNIFICANCE TO THE ENTIRE10 |
---|
69 | 65 | | STATE;11 |
---|
70 | 66 | | (II) T |
---|
71 | 67 | | HE SANGRE DE CRISTO LAND GRANT LANDS ARE AT RISK OF12 |
---|
72 | 68 | | LANDOWNERS UNDERTAKING |
---|
73 | 69 | | ENVIRONMENTALLY DAMAGING FENCING13 |
---|
74 | 70 | | PROJECTS WITHOUT OVERSIGHT OR INTERVENTION BY A LOCAL14 |
---|
75 | 71 | | GOVERNMENT;15 |
---|
76 | 72 | | (III) T |
---|
77 | 73 | | HESE FENCING PROJECTS DENY WILDLIFE ACCESS TO WATER ,16 |
---|
78 | 74 | | FOOD, AND SHELTER THAT THE WILDLIFE DEPENDS ON TO SURVIVE AND17 |
---|
79 | 75 | | ALSO DISTURB ESTABLISHED MIGRATION PATTERNS ;18 |
---|
80 | 76 | | (IV) T |
---|
81 | 77 | | HESE FENCING PROJECTS ALSO ADVERSELY IMPACT THE19 |
---|
82 | 78 | | VEGETATION THAT HELPS TO PREVENT SOIL EROSION , MAINTAIN WATER20 |
---|
83 | 79 | | QUALITY, AND PROVIDE A HABITAT FOR WILDLIFE; AND21 |
---|
84 | 80 | | 1023-2- (V) THEREFORE, REVIEW OF CERTAIN FENCING PROJECTS IN THE1 |
---|
85 | 81 | | S |
---|
86 | 82 | | ANGRE DE CRISTO LAND GRANT LANDS BY LOCAL GOVERNMENTS :2 |
---|
87 | 83 | | (A) I |
---|
88 | 84 | | S NECESSARY TO AVOID NEGATIVE IMPACTS TO WILDLIFE AND3 |
---|
89 | 85 | | VEGETATION BEFORE THE FENCING PROJECT COMMENCES ; AND4 |
---|
90 | 86 | | (B) A |
---|
91 | 87 | | LLOWS LOCAL GOVERNMENTS THE FLEXIBILITY TO APPROVE5 |
---|
92 | 88 | | THE FENCING PROJECT IF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT DETERMINES THAT THE6 |
---|
93 | 89 | | BENEFITS OF THE FENCING PROJECT OUTWEIGH THE HARMS .7 |
---|
94 | 90 | | (b) T |
---|
95 | 91 | | HE GENERAL ASSEMBLY THEREFORE DECLARES THAT THE8 |
---|
96 | 92 | | REVIEW OF CERTAIN FENCING PROJECTS IN THE SANGRE DE CRISTO LAND9 |
---|
97 | 93 | | GRANT LANDS BY LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IS A MATTER OF STATEWIDE10 |
---|
98 | 94 | | CONCERN AND HAS A SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFIT TO THE11 |
---|
99 | 95 | | STATE.12 |
---|
100 | 96 | | (2) A |
---|
101 | 97 | | S USED IN THIS SECTION, UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE13 |
---|
102 | 98 | | REQUIRES:14 |
---|
103 | 99 | | (a) "C |
---|
104 | 100 | | ONTIGUOUS" MEANS THAT EACH PORTION OF FENCE IS NO15 |
---|
105 | 101 | | MORE THAN THREE FEET FROM A DIRECTLY ADJACENT PORTION OF FENCE .16 |
---|
106 | 102 | | (b) (I) "C |
---|
107 | 103 | | OVERED FENCING PROJECT" MEANS A PROJECT TO INSTALL17 |
---|
108 | 104 | | OR SUBSTANTIALLY REPAIR A CONTIGUOUS FENCE THAT IS PARTIALLY OR18 |
---|
109 | 105 | | ENTIRELY IN THE SANGRE DE CRISTO LAND GRANT LANDS AND THAT UPON19 |
---|
110 | 106 | | COMPLETION WILL:20 |
---|
111 | 107 | | (A) E |
---|
112 | 108 | | NCLOSE A SPACE AND WILL BE NO LOWER THAN FIVE FEET IN21 |
---|
113 | 109 | | HEIGHT AT ANY POINT ALONG THE FENCE AND WILL BE ONE MILE IN22 |
---|
114 | 110 | | LENGTH OR LONGER; OR23 |
---|
115 | 111 | | (B) N |
---|
116 | 112 | | OT ENCLOSE A SPACE AND WILL BE NO LOWER THAN FIVE24 |
---|
117 | 113 | | FEET IN HEIGHT AT ANY POINT ALONG THE FENCE AND WILL BE ONE -HALF25 |
---|
118 | 114 | | MILE IN LENGTH OR LONGER.26 |
---|
119 | 115 | | (II) "C |
---|
120 | 116 | | OVERED FENCING PROJECT" INCLUDES THE ADDITION OF27 |
---|
121 | 117 | | 1023 |
---|
122 | 118 | | -3- HEIGHT OR LENGTH TO A CONTIGUOUS FENCE THAT CAUSES THE1 |
---|
123 | 119 | | CONTIGUOUS FENCE TO MEET THE HEIGHT AND LENGTH SPECIFICATIONS2 |
---|
124 | 120 | | DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (2)(b)(I) OF THIS SECTION.3 |
---|
125 | 121 | | (c) "D |
---|
126 | 122 | | ISTURBANCE" MEANS A DISTURBANCE OF MORE THAN ONE4 |
---|
127 | 123 | | ACRE OF TOPSOIL.5 |
---|
128 | 124 | | (d) "F |
---|
129 | 125 | | ENCE" INCLUDES GATES.6 |
---|
130 | 126 | | (e) "P |
---|
131 | 127 | | RISON" MEANS A:7 |
---|
132 | 128 | | (I) C |
---|
133 | 129 | | ORRECTIONAL FACILITY, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 17-1-1028 |
---|
134 | 130 | | (1.7);9 |
---|
135 | 131 | | (II) L |
---|
136 | 132 | | OCAL JAIL, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 17-1-102 (7); OR10 |
---|
137 | 133 | | (III) P |
---|
138 | 134 | | RIVATE CONTRACT PRISON, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 17-1-10211 |
---|
139 | 135 | | (7.3).12 |
---|
140 | 136 | | (f) "P |
---|
141 | 137 | | UBLIC SCHOOL" HAS THE MEANING SET FORTH IN SECTION13 |
---|
142 | 138 | | 22-1-144 (1)(d).14 |
---|
143 | 139 | | (g) "P |
---|
144 | 140 | | UBLIC UTILITY" HAS THE MEANING SET FORTH IN SECTION15 |
---|
145 | 141 | | 40-1-103 (1)(a)(I).16 |
---|
146 | 142 | | (h) "S |
---|
147 | 143 | | ANGRE DE CRISTO LAND GRANT LANDS" MEANS THE PORTION17 |
---|
148 | 144 | | OF LANDS IN COLORADO THAT IS COVERED BY THE SANGRE DE CRISTO18 |
---|
149 | 145 | | LAND GRANT, WHICH WAS GRANTED TO SETTLERS BY MEXICO IN 1844 AND19 |
---|
150 | 146 | | CONFIRMED BY THE UNITED STATES IN 1848 THROUGH THE TREATY OF20 |
---|
151 | 147 | | G |
---|
152 | 148 | | UADALUPE HIDALGO.21 |
---|
153 | 149 | | (i) "S |
---|
154 | 150 | | UBSTANTIALLY REPAIR" MEANS A LEVEL OF REPAIR THAT22 |
---|
155 | 151 | | REQUIRES AT LEAST ONE-HALF MILE OF FENCE TO BE TAKEN DOWN AND23 |
---|
156 | 152 | | REINSTALLED.24 |
---|
157 | 153 | | (3) (a) O |
---|
158 | 154 | | N OR AFTER JULY 1, 2025, BEFORE COMMENCING A25 |
---|
159 | 155 | | COVERED FENCING PROJECT, A PERSON SHALL SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR26 |
---|
160 | 156 | | THE COVERED FENCING PROJECT TO THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT WITH27 |
---|
161 | 157 | | 1023 |
---|
162 | 158 | | -4- JURISDICTION OVER THE COVERED FENCING PROJECT . IF TWO OR MORE1 |
---|
163 | 159 | | ADJACENT LOCAL GOVERNMENTS HAVE JURISDICTION OVER THE COVERED2 |
---|
164 | 160 | | FENCING PROJECT, THE PERSON SHALL SUBMIT THE APPLICATION FOR THE3 |
---|
165 | 161 | | COVERED FENCING PROJECT TO THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT WITH THE4 |
---|
166 | 162 | | JURISDICTION THAT WILL CONTAIN THE MOST FENCE WHEN THE COVERED5 |
---|
167 | 163 | | FENCING PROJECT IS COMPLETE. THE APPLICATION MUST CONTAIN, AT A6 |
---|
168 | 164 | | MINIMUM, THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION :7 |
---|
169 | 165 | | (I) F |
---|
170 | 166 | | ENCE HEIGHT;8 |
---|
171 | 167 | | (II) F |
---|
172 | 168 | | ENCE LENGTH;9 |
---|
173 | 169 | | (III) F |
---|
174 | 170 | | ENCE TYPE;10 |
---|
175 | 171 | | (IV) F |
---|
176 | 172 | | ENCE MATERIAL;11 |
---|
177 | 173 | | (V) A |
---|
178 | 174 | | DJUSTMENTS MADE TO ALLOW FOR WILDLIFE PASSAGE ;12 |
---|
179 | 175 | | (VI) W |
---|
180 | 176 | | HETHER A DISTURBANCE HAS OCCURRED OR WILL OCCUR AS13 |
---|
181 | 177 | | A RESULT OF THE FENCING PROJECT;14 |
---|
182 | 178 | | (VII) M |
---|
183 | 179 | | IGRATION AND HUNTING PATTERNS IN THE AREA OF THE15 |
---|
184 | 180 | | FENCING PROJECT;16 |
---|
185 | 181 | | (VIII) T |
---|
186 | 182 | | HE PURPOSE OF THE FENCING PROJECT; AND17 |
---|
187 | 183 | | (IX) A |
---|
188 | 184 | | NY OTHER INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THE LOCAL18 |
---|
189 | 185 | | GOVERNMENT'S DECISION PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (3)(c) OF THIS19 |
---|
190 | 186 | | SECTION.20 |
---|
191 | 187 | | (b) N |
---|
192 | 188 | | O LATER THAN FOURTEEN DAYS AFTER THE LOCAL21 |
---|
193 | 189 | | GOVERNMENT'S RECEIPT OF AN APPLICATION DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION22 |
---|
194 | 190 | | (3)(a) |
---|
195 | 191 | | OF THIS SECTION, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL PUBLISH NOTICE23 |
---|
196 | 192 | | OF THE APPLICATION ON THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT 'S WEBSITE.24 |
---|
197 | 193 | | (c) N |
---|
198 | 194 | | O LATER THAN SIXTY DAYS AFTER THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT 'S25 |
---|
199 | 195 | | RECEIPT OF AN APPLICATION DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (3)(a) OF THIS26 |
---|
200 | 196 | | SECTION, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL EITHER APPROVE OR REJECT THE27 |
---|
201 | 197 | | 1023 |
---|
202 | 198 | | -5- APPLICATION BASED ON WHETHER :1 |
---|
203 | 199 | | (I) T |
---|
204 | 200 | | HERE IS A RATIONAL PURPOSE FOR THE COVERED FENCING2 |
---|
205 | 201 | | PROJECT;3 |
---|
206 | 202 | | (II) T |
---|
207 | 203 | | HE COVERED FENCING PROJECT WOULD HAVE AN ADVERSE4 |
---|
208 | 204 | | IMPACT ON HUNTERS' RIGHTS;5 |
---|
209 | 205 | | (III) T |
---|
210 | 206 | | HE COVERED FENCING PROJECT WOULD HAVE AN ADVERSE6 |
---|
211 | 207 | | IMPACT ON SURROUNDING FLOODPLAINS ;7 |
---|
212 | 208 | | (IV) T |
---|
213 | 209 | | HE APPLICANT INTENDS TO COMPLETE NECESSARY8 |
---|
214 | 210 | | REVEGETATION AS A RESULT OF THE COVERED FENCING PROJECT ; AND9 |
---|
215 | 211 | | (V) T |
---|
216 | 212 | | HE COVERED FENCING PROJECT WOULD SIGNIFICANTLY10 |
---|
217 | 213 | | DEGRADE THE AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE SURROUNDING LANDSCAPE .11 |
---|
218 | 214 | | (d) E |
---|
219 | 215 | | XCEPT AS SET FORTH IN SUBSECTION (3)(e) OF THIS SECTION,12 |
---|
220 | 216 | | A LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL NOT A PPROVE AN APPLICATION SUBMITTED13 |
---|
221 | 217 | | PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (3)(a) OF THIS SECTION UNLESS THE APPLICANT14 |
---|
222 | 218 | | DEMONSTRATES THAT THE COVERED FENCING PROJECT WILL :15 |
---|
223 | 219 | | (I) P |
---|
224 | 220 | | ROVIDE PASSAGE FOR LARGE MAMMALIAN WILDLIFE THROUGH16 |
---|
225 | 221 | | AN OPENING THAT IS AT LEAST TWENTY FEET WIDE AND HAVE |
---|
226 | 222 | | A HEIGHT OF17 |
---|
227 | 223 | | NOT MORE THAN FORTY-TWO INCHES FROM THE GROUND TO THE TOP RAIL18 |
---|
228 | 224 | | OR WIRE FOR AT LEAST EVERY ONE-FOURTH MILE OF FENCE;19 |
---|
229 | 225 | | (II) P |
---|
230 | 226 | | ROVIDE PASSAGE FOR SMALL MAMMALIAN WILDLIFE20 |
---|
231 | 227 | | THROUGH AN OPENING THAT IS AT LEAST FIVE FEET WIDE AND HAVE |
---|
232 | 228 | | A21 |
---|
233 | 229 | | HEIGHT OF AT LEAST SIXTEEN INCHES FROM THE GROUND TO THE BOTTOM22 |
---|
234 | 230 | | RAIL OR WIRE FOR AT LEAST EVERY ONE-TENTH MILE OF FENCE; AND23 |
---|
235 | 231 | | (III) N |
---|
236 | 232 | | OT CAUSE A DISTURBANCE, UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS24 |
---|
237 | 233 | | OBTAINED ANY NECESSARY PERMIT FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC25 |
---|
238 | 234 | | HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT .26 |
---|
239 | 235 | | (e) N |
---|
240 | 236 | | OTWITHSTANDING THIS SUBSECTION (3), THE LOCAL27 |
---|
241 | 237 | | 1023 |
---|
242 | 238 | | -6- GOVERNMENT MAY APPROVE AN APPLICATION PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION1 |
---|
243 | 239 | | (3)(c) |
---|
244 | 240 | | OF THIS SECTION IF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT DETERMINES THAT THE2 |
---|
245 | 241 | | BENEFITS OF THE COVERED FENCING PROJECT OUTWEIGH THE HARMS .3(f) NOTWITHSTANDING THIS SUBSECTION (3), A LOCAL4 |
---|
246 | 242 | | GOVERNMENT SHALL NOT REQUIRE A PERSON COMMENCING A COVERED5 |
---|
247 | 243 | | FENCING PROJECT TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION6 |
---|
248 | 244 | | (3)(a) OF THIS SECTION OR PAY A FEE ASSOCIATED WITH SUBMITTING AN7 |
---|
249 | 245 | | APPLICATION IF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS THAT THE COVERED8 |
---|
250 | 246 | | FENCING PROJECT PRESENTS NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS .9 |
---|
251 | 247 | | (4) (a) A |
---|
252 | 248 | | LOCAL GOVERNMENT ORDINANCE , RESOLUTION,10 |
---|
253 | 249 | | REGULATION, OR OTHER LAW THAT IS MORE STRICT THAN ONE OR MORE OF11 |
---|
254 | 250 | | THE STANDARDS DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (3) OF THIS SECTION12 |
---|
255 | 251 | | SUPERSEDES THE CONFLICTING STANDARD OR STANDARDS DESCRIBED IN13 |
---|
256 | 252 | | SUBSECTION (3) OF THIS SECTION FOR ANY APPLICATIONS SUBMI TTED14 |
---|
257 | 253 | | WITHIN THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT 'S JURISDICTION.15 (b) A LOCAL GOVERNMENT IS ONLY SUBJECT TO THE16 |
---|
258 | 254 | | REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION IF THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE LOCAL17 |
---|
259 | 255 | | GOVERNMENT ADOPTS AN ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, REGULATION, OR18 |
---|
260 | 256 | | OTHER LAW DECLARING THAT THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT OPTS INTO THE19 |
---|
261 | 257 | | REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION.20 |
---|
262 | 258 | | (5) T |
---|
263 | 259 | | HIS SECTION DOES NOT APPLY TO A COVERED FENCING21 |
---|
264 | 260 | | PROJECT THAT IS NECESSARY FOR:22 |
---|
265 | 261 | | (a) A |
---|
266 | 262 | | PROJECT BY A PUBLIC UTILITY OR THE DEPARTMENT OF23 |
---|
267 | 263 | | TRANSPORTATION OR THAT IS AN ENERGY SECTOR PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT ; |
---|
268 | 264 | | 24 |
---|
269 | 265 | | (b) T |
---|
270 | 266 | | HE SAFETY OR SECURITY OF A PUBLIC SCHOOL OR A |
---|
271 | 267 | | PRISON;25 |
---|
272 | 268 | | OR26 |
---|
273 | 269 | | (c) FENCES PROVIDED BY THE DIVISION OF PARKS AND WILDLIFE27 |
---|
274 | 270 | | 1023 |
---|
275 | 271 | | -7- PURSUANT TO PART 1 OF ARTICLE 3 OF TITLE 33.1 |
---|
276 | 272 | | SECTION 2. Applicability. This act applies to covered fencing2 |
---|
277 | 273 | | projects commencing on or after July 1, 2025.3 |
---|
278 | 274 | | SECTION 3. Safety clause. The general assembly finds,4 |
---|
279 | 275 | | determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate5 |
---|
280 | 276 | | preservation of the public peace, health, or safety or for appropriations for6 |
---|
281 | 277 | | the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state7 |
---|
282 | 278 | | institutions.8 |
---|
283 | 279 | | 1023 |
---|
284 | 280 | | -8- |
---|