Colorado 2025 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1105

Introduced
1/27/25  
Refer
1/27/25  
Report Pass
3/17/25  
Refer
3/17/25  
Report Pass
4/4/25  
Refer
4/4/25  
Engrossed
4/15/25  
Refer
4/15/25  
Report Pass
4/22/25  
Refer
4/22/25  
Report Pass
4/25/25  
Refer
4/25/25  
Engrossed
5/12/25  
Engrossed
5/12/25  
Enrolled
5/12/25  

Caption

Public Employees' Retirement Association True-up of Denver Public Schools Division Employer Contribution

Impact

The bill implements changes in existing statutory contributions, enhancing the financial stability of the public employees' retirement system and ensuring equitable employer contributions across divisions. This is significant for the Denver Public Schools Division, as it may help address prior discrepancies related to employer contributions that were based on separate retirement systems. The adjustments are aimed at bolstering the overall financial health of the incorporated trust funds and ensuring adequate resources for future retirement payouts.

Summary

House Bill 1105 concerns adjustments to the employer contribution rate for the Denver Public Schools Division under the Public Employees' Retirement Association. The bill aims to equalize the Denver Public Schools Division status to align with the general school division following the merger of the Denver Public Schools Retirement System with the association. Starting July 1, 2025, the contribution rates for both employers and members will be tied to the established rates for the appropriate divisions, as specified within the bill's provisions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1105 is largely supportive, particularly from proponents who view the bill as a necessary step toward creating parity between the Denver Public Schools and other school district employees. Advocates argue that this legislative change fosters a fairer contribution structure that benefits educators and educational staff employed under the public system. However, there may also be concerns from those apprehensive about how these adjustments could affect funding allocation and future benefits for retired employees.

Contention

Despite the positive reception, discussions around the bill highlight some potential contention points. Critics of the merger and contributions alignment may express concerns regarding the implications for existing benefit structures and the possible reallocation of funds. Additionally, any changes in contribution schemes must be carefully monitored to prevent unintended financial strain on the district or minimize disruptions in the current pension funding structure.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB794

Political Reform Act of 1974: contribution limits.

CA AB2882

Campaign contributions.

CA AB775

Contribution requirements: recurring contributions.

CA SB1422

Disclosures: Travel DISCLOSE Act.

CA AB511

Personal income taxes: voluntary contributions: California ALS Research Network Voluntary Tax Contribution Fund.

AZ HB2443

Campaign finance; contributions limits

CA SB1363

Personal income taxes: voluntary contributions: National Alliance on Mental Illness California Voluntary Tax Contribution Fund.

CA SB1149

Public employees’ retirement: defined contribution program.