Colorado 2025 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1122

Introduced
1/28/25  
Refer
1/28/25  
Report Pass
2/19/25  
Refer
2/19/25  
Report Pass
4/22/25  
Refer
4/22/25  
Engrossed
4/24/25  
Refer
4/24/25  
Report Pass
4/28/25  
Refer
4/28/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Refer
4/30/25  
Engrossed
5/14/25  
Engrossed
5/14/25  
Enrolled
5/14/25  

Caption

Automated Driving System Commercial Motor Vehicle

Impact

If implemented, HB 1122 would significantly alter the dynamics of how automated driving technology is integrated into commercial transportation. It introduces legal obligations for the presence of a licensed driver, which is intended to mitigate risks associated with automation. This change aims to ensure that human oversight is always maintained, especially when vehicles are operating under automated systems. Moreover, violations of this regulation are classified as a Class A traffic infraction, which may lead to fines and other penalties, further emphasizing the importance of compliance.

Summary

House Bill 1122 establishes new requirements for the operation of automated driving systems in commercial motor vehicles. Notably, the bill mandates that a human with a commercial driver's license must be physically present in any vehicle being driven by an automated system. This human must be seated in the driver's seat while hazardous materials are being transported and must monitor the vehicle's performance to ensure safety and compliance with laws. The law seeks to address the growing presence of automated driving technology in the commercial sector while prioritizing public safety.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding HB 1122 appears mixed among stakeholders. Supporters highlight the safety implications, arguing that requiring a human presence in the vehicle enhances accountability and reduces the potential for accidents caused by failure of the automated system. Critics, however, may view the bill as a potential barrier to the advancement of automated vehicle technologies and their full operational use in commerce, suggesting that the requirements could hinder innovation in the industry.

Contention

A notable point of contention arises from the tension between innovation in automated technology and traditional safety protocols. While the bill establishes safeguards intended to protect public safety, there are concerns from technology developers about the constraints it might place on the adoption and expansion of automated systems in commercial applications. Additionally, discussions around the adequacy of regulatory frameworks to adapt to evolving technologies further complicate the sentiment surrounding the bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.