Colorado 2025 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1151

Introduced
1/29/25  
Refer
1/29/25  
Report Pass
2/19/25  
Refer
2/19/25  
Engrossed
3/5/25  
Refer
3/5/25  

Caption

Arbitration of Health Insurance Claims

Impact

If enacted, HB 1151 would significantly impact the Colorado Revised Statutes related to health insurance and network adequacy. It requires the commissioner of insurance to develop rules specifying the required information that insurance carriers must provide during the initial payment of claims. This includes details about whether the payments are based on state or federal regulations. The bill aims to clarify processes for out-of-network emergency services, potentially leading to fewer disputes and clearer outcomes for claims.

Summary

House Bill 1151 aims to modify the arbitration requirements for out-of-network health insurance claims in Colorado. Specifically, the bill mandates that the arbitration process must include a batching mechanism, allowing multiple claims to be considered together under a single arbitration fee. This aligns with federal standards, promoting consistency in how out-of-network claims are handled. The intent behind this change is to streamline the arbitration process and provide clearer guidelines for both insurance carriers and healthcare providers.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 1151 appears to lean towards a supportive stance among those advocating for clearer processes in health insurance claims. Proponents argue that the batching process could reduce the administrative burdens on providers and streamline patient access to needed services. However, there may be concerns among some healthcare providers regarding how effectively this system would be implemented and whether it sufficiently addresses the complexities of out-of-network claims.

Contention

Notable points of contention might arise around how effectively the arbitration process can be conducted when multiple claims are batched together. There may also be concerns regarding the independence of arbitrators and whether the final decisions will reflect fair outcomes for both providers and insurers. The bill's requirement for adherence to federal laws like the No Surprises Act adds another layer of complexity, raising questions about how existing state laws will be reconciled with federal regulations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CO SB163

Arbitration of Health Insurance Claims

CO SB089

Uniform Family Law Arbitration Act

CO HB1224

Standardized Health Benefit Plan

CO HB1060

Travel Insurance Consumer Protections

CO HB1113

Credit for Paid Health Insurance Deductible

CO SB093

Continuity of Health-Care Coverage Change

CO SB189

Increasing Access To Reproductive Health Care

CO HB1149

Prior Authorization Requirements Alternatives

CO SB080

Transparency in Health-Care Coverage

CO SB135

Modification of State Agency & Department Reporting Requirements

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.