Colorado 2025 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1249

Introduced
2/12/25  
Refer
2/12/25  
Report Pass
3/27/25  
Refer
3/27/25  
Engrossed
4/29/25  
Refer
4/29/25  
Report Pass
5/1/25  
Refer
5/1/25  
Enrolled
5/7/25  
Engrossed
5/15/25  
Engrossed
5/15/25  
Enrolled
5/15/25  

Caption

Tenant Security Deposit Protections

Impact

If passed, HB1249 would significantly alter the dynamics of landlord-tenant relationships in Colorado by increasing the accountability of landlords in their rental agreements. This legislation can empower tenants by ensuring they are protected against wrongful retention of their deposits and ensure they receive timely returns. The amendment sets clear expectations for both parties, potentially reducing disputes filed in small claims court concerning deposit retention.

Summary

House Bill 1249, aimed at enhancing tenant security deposit protections, seeks to amend existing Colorado law regarding the handling and return of security deposits by landlords. The bill stipulates clear guidelines on when a landlord can retain any part of a security deposit, specifically stating that landlords cannot deduct for normal wear and tear or for damages that predate the tenancy. Additionally, the timeline for returning security deposits is tightened, requiring landlords to return deposits within thirty days or to provide a detailed explanation if retention is deemed necessary.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment around HB1249 appears to be positive, especially among tenant advocacy groups and some legislators who see the bill as a much-needed reform in housing law. Supporters argue that the bill acknowledges the often-overlooked rights of tenants and seeks to make the renting process more transparent. However, some landlords and property management associations express concerns about the increased burden of compliance and the potential for misinterpretation of damages.

Contention

Notable points of contention within the discussions surrounding HB1249 include the interpretation of what constitutes 'normal wear and tear' and the extent of landlords' duties in documenting conditions at the start and end of tenancies. Critics worry that the bill may inadvertently lead to stricter limitations on property maintenance claims landlords can file, thus complicating the rental process and making it difficult for landlords to retain necessary funds for legitimate property damage.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB12

Tenancy: security deposits.

CA AB2801

Tenancy: security deposits.

CA SB644

Tenancy: security deposit: service members.

NJ S4280

Establishes standards for determining an unconscionable rent increase; excludes from public access landlord tenant records in certain circumstances.

NJ A5432

Establishes standards for determining an unconscionable rent increase; excludes from public access landlord tenant records in certain circumstances.