2 | | - | BY SENATOR(S) Roberts and Catlin, Bridges, Marchman, Pelton B., |
---|
3 | | - | Simpson, Amabile, Baisley, Bright, Carson, Cutter, Daugherty, Exum, |
---|
4 | | - | Frizell, Hinrichsen, Jodeh, Kipp, Kirkmeyer, Kolker, Liston, Lundeen, |
---|
5 | | - | Michaelson Jenet, Mullica, Pelton R., Rich, Rodriguez, Snyder, Weissman, |
---|
6 | | - | Winter F., Coleman; |
---|
7 | | - | also REPRESENTATIVE(S) McCluskie and Winter T., Martinez, |
---|
8 | | - | McCormick, Bird, Boesenecker, Bradley, Brown, Caldwell, Duran, |
---|
9 | | - | Johnson, Joseph, Keltie, Lieder, Lukens, Mauro, Richardson, Soper, Suckla, |
---|
10 | | - | Taggart, Titone, Valdez, Weinberg. |
---|
| 9 | + | Senate Committees House Committees |
---|
| 10 | + | Agriculture & Natural Resources Agri culture, Water & Natural Resources |
---|
| 11 | + | A BILL FOR AN ACT |
---|
12 | | - | ONCERNING PROTECTION OF THE PERSONAL INFORMATION OF PERSONS |
---|
13 | | - | IMPACTED BY WILDLIFE DAMAGE |
---|
14 | | - | . |
---|
15 | | - | |
---|
16 | | - | Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado: |
---|
17 | | - | SECTION 1. Legislative declaration. (1) The general assembly |
---|
18 | | - | finds that: |
---|
19 | | - | (a) Proposition 114, the ballot measure enacted in 2020 that |
---|
20 | | - | authorized the process to introduce gray wolves in Colorado, explicitly |
---|
21 | | - | required the state to fairly compensate owners for losses of livestock caused |
---|
22 | | - | by gray wolves in addition to losses of livestock caused by other wildlife; |
---|
23 | | - | ________ |
---|
24 | | - | Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law; dashes |
---|
25 | | - | through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of |
---|
26 | | - | the act. (b) To fulfill this obligation, the general assembly passed and the |
---|
27 | | - | governor signed into law Senate Bill 23-255, enacted in 2023, which, along |
---|
28 | | - | with funding sources that exist for damages resulting from other types of |
---|
29 | | - | wildlife, created a dedicated compensation fund to compensate owners for |
---|
30 | | - | depredation of livestock and working animals by gray wolves; |
---|
31 | | - | (c) Now that gray wolves have been released and are present in |
---|
32 | | - | Colorado, along with depredation by other wildlife, livestock and working |
---|
33 | | - | animals have been killed by wolves, entitling ranchers to compensation for |
---|
34 | | - | the losses; and |
---|
35 | | - | (d) However, ranchers in the state have been reluctant to participate |
---|
36 | | - | in site assessments and file claims for compensation due to the fear of their |
---|
37 | | - | personal information being made public through open records requests |
---|
38 | | - | brought by individuals and organizations with the intent of: |
---|
39 | | - | (I) Traveling to the rancher's home or business to view gray wolves |
---|
40 | | - | and other wildlife; |
---|
41 | | - | (II) Contacting the rancher directly; or |
---|
42 | | - | (III) Using the rancher's personal information to conduct other |
---|
43 | | - | invasions of the rancher's privacy. |
---|
44 | | - | (2) The general assembly therefore declares that: |
---|
45 | | - | (a) It is the intent of the state through the enactment of Proposition |
---|
46 | | - | 114 and Senate Bill 23-255 to prevent future depredations and fairly |
---|
47 | | - | compensate ranchers for their losses; and |
---|
48 | | - | (b) By protecting the personal information of people that make |
---|
49 | | - | compensation claims, more ranchers will be comfortable submitting |
---|
50 | | - | depredation claims to the division of parks and wildlife and participating in |
---|
51 | | - | proactive nonlethal measures, and the intent of Proposition 114 and Senate |
---|
52 | | - | Bill 23-255 will be better fulfilled. |
---|
53 | | - | SECTION 2. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 24-72-204, add |
---|
54 | | - | (3)(a)(XXIV) as follows: |
---|
55 | | - | PAGE 2-SENATE BILL 25-038 24-72-204. Allowance or denial of inspection - grounds - |
---|
56 | | - | procedure - appeal - definitions - repeal. (3) (a) The custodian shall deny |
---|
57 | | - | the right of inspection of the following records, unless otherwise provided |
---|
58 | | - | by law; except that the custodian shall make any of the following records, |
---|
59 | | - | other than letters of reference concerning employment, licensing, or |
---|
60 | | - | issuance of permits, available to the person in interest in accordance with |
---|
61 | | - | this subsection (3): |
---|
| 13 | + | ONCERNING PROTECTION OF TH E PERSONAL INFORMATION OF101 |
---|
| 14 | + | PERSONS IMPACTED BY WILDLIFE DAMAGE .102 |
---|
| 15 | + | Bill Summary |
---|
| 16 | + | (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does |
---|
| 17 | + | not reflect any amendments that may be subsequently adopted. If this bill |
---|
| 18 | + | passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that |
---|
| 19 | + | applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at |
---|
| 20 | + | http://leg.colorado.gov/ |
---|
| 21 | + | .) |
---|
| 22 | + | Water Resources and Agriculture Review Committee. Under |
---|
| 23 | + | current law, a person may file a claim with the division of parks and |
---|
| 24 | + | wildlife (division) for compensation for damages to property caused by |
---|
| 25 | + | wildlife, and the division must review and investigate that claim (claim |
---|
| 26 | + | procedures). The bill changes current law by requiring that the personal |
---|
| 27 | + | information of a claimant received by the division through the claim |
---|
| 28 | + | HOUSE |
---|
| 29 | + | 3rd Reading Unamended |
---|
| 30 | + | February 28, 2025 |
---|
| 31 | + | HOUSE |
---|
| 32 | + | 2nd Reading Unamended |
---|
| 33 | + | February 27, 2025 |
---|
| 34 | + | SENATE |
---|
| 35 | + | 3rd Reading Unamended |
---|
| 36 | + | February 5, 2025 |
---|
| 37 | + | SENATE |
---|
| 38 | + | Amended 2nd Reading |
---|
| 39 | + | February 4, 2025 |
---|
| 40 | + | SENATE SPONSORSHIP |
---|
| 41 | + | Roberts and Catlin, Bridges, Marchman, Pelton B., Simpson, Amabile, Baisley, Bright, |
---|
| 42 | + | Carson, Coleman, Cutter, Daugherty, Exum, Frizell, Hinrichsen, Jodeh, Kipp, Kirkmeyer, |
---|
| 43 | + | Kolker, Liston, Lundeen, Michaelson Jenet, Mullica, Pelton R., Rich, Rodriguez, Snyder, |
---|
| 44 | + | Weissman, Winter F. |
---|
| 45 | + | HOUSE SPONSORSHIP |
---|
| 46 | + | McCluskie and Winter T., Martinez, McCormick, Bird, Boesenecker, Bradley, Brown, |
---|
| 47 | + | Caldwell, Duran, Johnson, Joseph, Keltie, Lieder, Lukens, Mauro, Richardson, Soper, Suckla, |
---|
| 48 | + | Taggart, Titone, Valdez, Weinberg |
---|
| 49 | + | Shading denotes HOUSE amendment. Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment. |
---|
| 50 | + | Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law. |
---|
| 51 | + | Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law. procedures and proactive nonlethal measures is kept confidential and not |
---|
| 52 | + | disclosed pursuant to the "Colorado Open Records Act". |
---|
| 53 | + | Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:1 |
---|
| 54 | + | SECTION 1. Legislative declaration. (1) The general assembly2 |
---|
| 55 | + | finds that:3 |
---|
| 56 | + | (a) Proposition 114, the ballot measure enacted in 2020 that4 |
---|
| 57 | + | authorized the process to introduce gray wolves in Colorado, explicitly5 |
---|
| 58 | + | required the state to fairly compensate owners for losses of livestock6 |
---|
| 59 | + | caused by gray wolves in addition to losses of livestock caused by other7 |
---|
| 60 | + | wildlife;8 |
---|
| 61 | + | (b) To fulfill this obligation, the general assembly passed and the9 |
---|
| 62 | + | governor signed into law Senate Bill 23-255, enacted in 2023, which,10 |
---|
| 63 | + | along with funding sources that exist for damages resulting from other11 |
---|
| 64 | + | types of wildlife, created a dedicated compensation fund to compensate12 |
---|
| 65 | + | owners for depredation of livestock and working animals by gray wolves;13 |
---|
| 66 | + | (c) Now that gray wolves have been released and are present in14 |
---|
| 67 | + | Colorado, along with depredation by other wildlife, livestock and15 |
---|
| 68 | + | working animals have been killed by wolves, entitling ranchers to16 |
---|
| 69 | + | compensation for the losses; and17 |
---|
| 70 | + | (d) However, ranchers in the state have been reluctant to18 |
---|
| 71 | + | participate in site assessments and file claims for compensation due to the19 |
---|
| 72 | + | fear of their personal information being made public through open20 |
---|
| 73 | + | records requests brought by individuals and organizations with the intent21 |
---|
| 74 | + | of:22 |
---|
| 75 | + | (I) Traveling to the rancher's home or business to view gray23 |
---|
| 76 | + | wolves and other wildlife;24 |
---|
| 77 | + | (II) Contacting the rancher directly; or25 |
---|
| 78 | + | 038-2- (III) Using the rancher's personal information to conduct other1 |
---|
| 79 | + | invasions of the rancher's privacy.2 |
---|
| 80 | + | (2) The general assembly therefore declares that:3 |
---|
| 81 | + | (a) It is the intent of the state through the enactment of Proposition4 |
---|
| 82 | + | 114 and Senate Bill 23-255 to prevent future depredations and fairly5 |
---|
| 83 | + | compensate ranchers for their losses; and6 |
---|
| 84 | + | (b) By protecting the personal information of people that make7 |
---|
| 85 | + | compensation claims, more ranchers will be comfortable submitting8 |
---|
| 86 | + | depredation claims to the division of parks and wildlife and participating9 |
---|
| 87 | + | in proactive nonlethal measures, and the intent of Proposition 114 and10 |
---|
| 88 | + | Senate Bill 23-255 will be better fulfilled.11 |
---|
| 89 | + | SECTION 2. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 24-72-204, add12 |
---|
| 90 | + | (3)(a)(XXIV) as follows:13 |
---|
| 91 | + | 24-72-204. Allowance or denial of inspection - grounds -14 |
---|
| 92 | + | procedure - appeal - definitions - repeal. (3) (a) The custodian shall15 |
---|
| 93 | + | deny the right of inspection of the following records, unless otherwise16 |
---|
| 94 | + | provided by law; except that the custodian shall make any of the17 |
---|
| 95 | + | following records, other than letters of reference concerning employment,18 |
---|
| 96 | + | licensing, or issuance of permits, available to the person in interest in19 |
---|
| 97 | + | accordance with this subsection (3):20 |
---|
89 | | - | ABOUT NONLETHAL PREDATOR |
---|
90 | | - | -LIVESTOCK CONFLICT MINIMIZATION |
---|
91 | | - | MEASURES USED BY OR RECOMMENDED TO A PERSON |
---|
92 | | - | , OR A SUMMARY OR |
---|
93 | | - | AGGREGATED DATA RELATED TO SUCH INFORMATION |
---|
94 | | - | , SO LONG AS THE |
---|
95 | | - | INFORMATION OR SUMMARY OR AGGREGATED DATA DOES NOT REVEAL THE |
---|
96 | | - | IDENTITY OF THE PERSON OR THE PERSON |
---|
97 | | - | 'S BUSINESS. |
---|
98 | | - | PAGE 3-SENATE BILL 25-038 (2) THE PERSONAL INFORMATION OF A PERSON THAT THE DIVISION |
---|
99 | | - | RECEIVES THROUGH THE CLAIM PROCEDURES DESCRIBED IN SECTIONS |
---|
100 | | - | 33-3-107 TO 33-3-110 AND SITE ASSESSMENTS CONDUCTED BY STATE |
---|
101 | | - | OFFICIALS AND THIRD PARTIES TO PREVENT FUTURE DEPREDATION AND ANY |
---|
102 | | - | PERSONAL OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE |
---|
103 | | - | USE OF PROACTIVE NONLETHAL PREDATOR |
---|
104 | | - | -LIVESTOCK CONFLICT |
---|
105 | | - | MINIMIZATION MEASURES IS CONFIDENTIAL AND IS NOT SUBJECT TO |
---|
106 | | - | DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO THE |
---|
107 | | - | "COLORADO OPEN RECORDS ACT", PART 2 |
---|
108 | | - | OF ARTICLE 72 OF TITLE 24. |
---|
| 119 | + | 10 |
---|
| 120 | + | ABOUT NONLETHAL PREDATOR -LIVESTOCK CONFLICT MINIMIZATION11 |
---|
| 121 | + | MEASURES USED BY OR RECOMMENDED TO A PERSON , OR A SUMMARY OR12 |
---|
| 122 | + | AGGREGATED DATA RELATED TO SUCH INFORMATION , SO LONG AS THE13 |
---|
| 123 | + | INFORMATION OR SUMMARY OR AGGREGATED DATA DOES NOT REVEAL14 |
---|
| 124 | + | THE IDENTITY OF THE PERSON OR THE PERSON 'S BUSINESS.15 |
---|
| 125 | + | (2) T |
---|
| 126 | + | HE PERSONAL INFORMATION OF A PERSON |
---|
| 127 | + | THAT THE DIVISION16 |
---|
| 128 | + | RECEIVES THROUGH THE CLAIM PROCEDURES DESCRIBED IN SECTIONS17 |
---|
| 129 | + | 33-3-107 |
---|
| 130 | + | TO 33-3-110 AND SITE ASSESSMENTS CONDUCTED BY STATE |
---|
| 131 | + | 18 |
---|
| 132 | + | OFFICIALS AND THIRD PARTIES TO PREVENT FUTURE DEPREDATION AND19 |
---|
| 133 | + | ANY PERSONAL OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ASSOCIATED20 |
---|
| 134 | + | WITH THE USE OF PROACTIVE NONLETHAL PREDATOR -LIVESTOCK CONFLICT21 |
---|
| 135 | + | MINIMIZATION MEASURES IS CONFIDENTIAL AND IS NOT SUBJECT TO22 |
---|
| 136 | + | DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO THE "COLORADO OPEN RECORDS ACT", PART23 |
---|
| 137 | + | 2 |
---|
| 138 | + | OF ARTICLE 72 OF TITLE 24.24 |
---|
136 | | - | PERSON SHALL NOT BRING OR MAINTAIN A PRIVATE ACTION , AT |
---|
137 | | - | LAW OR IN EQUITY |
---|
138 | | - | , CHALLENGING THE DIVISION'S DETERMINATION THAT A |
---|
139 | | - | PERSON |
---|
140 | | - | , OR AN AUTHORIZED DESIGNEE OR REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PERSON , |
---|
141 | | - | HAS TAKEN ACTIONS OR MADE STATEMENTS THAT LED TO THE PERSON 'S |
---|
142 | | - | PERSONAL INFORMATION BECOMING PUBLICLY KNOWN |
---|
143 | | - | . |
---|
144 | | - | (6) A |
---|
145 | | - | NY PERSON, OR AUTHORIZED DESIGNEE OR REPRESENTATIVE OF |
---|
146 | | - | THE PERSON |
---|
147 | | - | , THAT REQUESTS RECORDS PERTAINING TO THE PERSON 'S OWN |
---|
148 | | - | CLAIM PURSUANT TO THE |
---|
149 | | - | "COLORADO OPEN RECORDS ACT", PART 2 OF |
---|
150 | | - | ARTICLE |
---|
151 | | - | 72 OF TITLE 24, IS ENTITLED TO RECEIVE THE RECORDS WITHOUT |
---|
152 | | - | REGARD TO SUBSECTION |
---|
153 | | - | (2) OF THIS SECTION. |
---|
154 | | - | SECTION 4. Act subject to petition - effective date. This act |
---|
155 | | - | PAGE 4-SENATE BILL 25-038 takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day following the expiration of the |
---|
156 | | - | ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly; except |
---|
157 | | - | that, if a referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3) of article V |
---|
158 | | - | of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act |
---|
159 | | - | within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect |
---|
160 | | - | unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in |
---|
161 | | - | November 2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the official |
---|
162 | | - | declaration of the vote thereon by the governor. |
---|
163 | | - | ____________________________ ____________________________ |
---|
164 | | - | James Rashad Coleman, Sr. Julie McCluskie |
---|
165 | | - | PRESIDENT OF SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE |
---|
166 | | - | THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
---|
167 | | - | ____________________________ ____________________________ |
---|
168 | | - | Esther van Mourik Vanessa Reilly |
---|
169 | | - | SECRETARY OF CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE |
---|
170 | | - | THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
---|
171 | | - | APPROVED________________________________________ |
---|
172 | | - | (Date and Time) |
---|
173 | | - | _________________________________________ |
---|
174 | | - | Jared S. Polis |
---|
175 | | - | GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO |
---|
176 | | - | PAGE 5-SENATE BILL 25-038 |
---|
| 162 | + | PERSON SHALL NOT BRING OR MAINTAIN A PRIVATE ACTION , |
---|
| 163 | + | 13 |
---|
| 164 | + | AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, CHALLENGING THE DIVISION'S DETERMINATION14 |
---|
| 165 | + | THAT A PERSON, OR AN AUTHORIZED DESIGNEE OR REPRESENTATIVE OF15 |
---|
| 166 | + | THE PERSON, HAS TAKEN ACTIONS OR MADE STATEMENTS THAT LED TO16 |
---|
| 167 | + | THE PERSON'S PERSONAL INFORMATION BECOMING PUBLICLY KNOWN .17 |
---|
| 168 | + | (6) ANY PERSON, OR AUTHORIZED DESIGNEE OR REPRESENTATIVE18 |
---|
| 169 | + | OF THE PERSON, THAT REQUESTS RECORDS PERTAINING TO THE PERSON 'S19 |
---|
| 170 | + | OWN CLAIM PURSUANT TO THE "COLORADO OPEN RECORDS ACT", PART20 |
---|
| 171 | + | 2 |
---|
| 172 | + | OF ARTICLE 72 OF TITLE 24, IS ENTITLED TO RECEIVE THE RECORDS21 |
---|
| 173 | + | WITHOUT REGARD TO SUBSECTION (2) OF THIS SECTION.22 |
---|
| 174 | + | SECTION 4. |
---|
| 175 | + | Act subject to petition - effective date. This act23 |
---|
| 176 | + | takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day following the expiration of the24 |
---|
| 177 | + | ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly; except25 |
---|
| 178 | + | that, if a referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3) of article V26 |
---|
| 179 | + | of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this27 |
---|
| 180 | + | 038 |
---|
| 181 | + | -5- act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take1 |
---|
| 182 | + | effect unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in2 |
---|
| 183 | + | November 2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the3 |
---|
| 184 | + | official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.4 |
---|
| 185 | + | 038 |
---|
| 186 | + | -6- |
---|