Colorado 2025 Regular Session

Colorado Senate Bill SB079

Introduced
1/23/25  
Refer
1/23/25  
Report Pass
2/19/25  
Refer
2/19/25  
Engrossed
3/3/25  
Refer
3/3/25  
Report Pass
4/14/25  
Refer
4/14/25  
Enrolled
4/28/25  
Engrossed
5/1/25  
Engrossed
5/2/25  
Enrolled
5/2/25  

Caption

Colorado Vending of Digital Assets Act

Impact

The passage of SB079 would primarily impact existing laws related to financial transactions and consumer protection in Colorado. By regulating how virtual currency kiosks operate, the bill aims to prevent fraudulent activities and provide clearer guidelines for consumers engaging with virtual currencies. This could lead to increased consumer confidence in using virtual currency kiosks while ensuring that kiosk operators are accountable for providing necessary information regarding transactions and refund policies.

Summary

Senate Bill 079, also known as the Colorado Vending of Digital Assets Act, establishes a regulatory framework for the operation of virtual currency kiosks in Colorado. The bill defines key terms, including 'virtual currency' and 'virtual currency kiosk,' and sets forth operating standards that kiosk owners must adhere to. Among these standards are the requirements for customer disclosures and transaction limits intended to enhance consumer protections. The bill's primary goal is to create a safer environment for users navigating the growing landscape of digital assets and transactions via automated kiosks.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB079 appears to be largely positive among advocates of consumer protection and financial regulation. Supporters argue that the bill addresses significant gaps in current legislation regarding virtual currency transactions. However, there are concerns from certain stakeholders regarding the potential regulatory burdens on kiosk operators and the fast-paced evolution of the cryptocurrency market, which may require more adaptable regulatory measures.

Contention

One notable point of contention relates to the transaction limits imposed on new and existing customers, which some argue may unfairly restrict usage for legitimate consumers while others believe they are essential for consumer safety. Additionally, discussions have surfaced around the adequacy of refund policies in the case of fraudulent transactions, particularly regarding the obligations of kiosk operators to provide refunds within specified timelines.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB618

Transactions and use taxes: City of Scotts Valley: City of Emeryville.

CA AB3259

Transactions and use taxes: City of Campbell: City of Pinole: County of Solano.

CA AB2598

Crimes: money laundering.

CA SB319

Criminal justice statistics: reporting.

CA SB703

Transactions and use taxes: Counties of Alameda and Santa Clara and City of Santa Fe Springs.

CA AB2443

Transactions and use taxes: Cities of Lancaster, Palmdale, and Victorville.

CA SB152

Transactions and use taxes: County of Sonoma.

CA SB335

Transactions and use taxes: County of Santa Clara.