Old | New | Differences | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | + | First Regular Session | |
2 | + | Seventy-fifth General Assembly | |
3 | + | STATE OF COLORADO | |
4 | + | REREVISED | |
5 | + | This Version Includes All Amendments | |
6 | + | Adopted in the Second House | |
7 | + | LLS NO. 25-0372.01 Alana Rosen x2606 | |
1 | 8 | SENATE BILL 25-087 | |
2 | - | BY SENATOR(S) Marchman, Ball, Cutter, Danielson, Gonzales J., | |
3 | - | Hinrichsen, Jodeh, Kipp, Kolker, Michaelson Jenet, Roberts, Snyder, | |
4 | - | Sullivan, Weissman, Winter F., Coleman; | |
5 | - | also REPRESENTATIVE(S) Stewart R. and Brooks, Boesenecker, | |
6 | - | Camacho, English, Froelich, Garcia, Hamrick, Jackson, Joseph, Lieder, | |
7 | - | Lukens, Martinez, Paschal, Ricks, Sirota, Soper, Stewart K., Story, | |
8 | - | McCluskie. | |
9 | + | Senate Committees House Committees | |
10 | + | Education Education | |
11 | + | A BILL FOR AN ACT | |
9 | 12 | C | |
10 | - | ONCERNING ESTABLISHING ACADEMIC ADJUSTMENTS FOR STUDENTS WITH | |
11 | - | DISABILITIES IN INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION | |
12 | - | . | |
13 | - | Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado: | |
14 | - | SECTION 1. Legislative declaration. (1) (a) The general | |
15 | - | assembly finds and declares that: | |
16 | - | (I) In accordance with federal law, Colorado law requires | |
17 | - | institutions of higher education to evaluate whether students with | |
18 | - | disabilities qualify for an academic adjustment by reviewing documentation, | |
19 | - | including existing individualized education programs and section 504 plans; | |
20 | - | (II) While many institutions of higher education have review | |
21 | - | NOTE: This bill has been prepared for the signatures of the appropriate legislative | |
22 | - | officers and the Governor. To determine whether the Governor has signed the bill | |
23 | - | or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative | |
24 | - | history, or the Session Laws. | |
25 | - | ________ | |
26 | - | Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law; dashes | |
27 | - | through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of | |
28 | - | the act. processes in place, inconsistencies and a lack of clarity in the review | |
29 | - | process and implementation of the review process may impede effective | |
30 | - | support for admitted or enrolled students with disabilities; | |
31 | - | (III) Based on feedback from students, faculty, and advocacy | |
32 | - | groups, there is a need for a clear, standardized process for institutions of | |
33 | - | higher education to review documents, including existing individualized | |
34 | - | education programs and section 504 plans, to determine whether a student | |
35 | - | qualifies for an academic adjustment; | |
36 | - | (IV) Enhancing clarity and transparency in the document review | |
37 | - | process to determine whether students with disabilities qualify for academic | |
38 | - | adjustments will improve the academic success and the well-being of | |
39 | - | enrolled students with disabilities; and | |
40 | - | (V) This act creates a transparent document review process for | |
41 | - | students with disabilities to understand and determine whether they qualify | |
42 | - | for academic adjustments while maintaining the authority of institutions of | |
43 | - | higher education to make the final determination as to whether a student | |
44 | - | with a disability qualifies for academic adjustments. | |
45 | - | (b) The general assembly finds, therefore, that it is necessary to: | |
46 | - | (I) Clarify the processes institutions of higher education use to | |
47 | - | review documentation, including existing individualized education | |
48 | - | programs and section 504 plans, to determine whether admitted or enrolled | |
49 | - | students with disabilities qualify for academic adjustments; | |
50 | - | (II) Ensure that the processes described in subsection (1)(b)(I) of | |
51 | - | this section do not create barriers for students with disabilities; | |
52 | - | (III) Implement accountability measures for an institution of higher | |
53 | - | education to fulfill its responsibilities by providing a description of the | |
54 | - | appeals process that focuses on documentary review; and | |
55 | - | (IV) Promote the alignment of state and federal law. | |
56 | - | SECTION 2. In Colorado Revised Statutes, add part 2 to article 1 | |
57 | - | of title 23 as follows: | |
58 | - | PAGE 2-SENATE BILL 25-087 PART 2 | |
59 | - | ACADEMIC ADJUSTMENTS | |
60 | - | IN HIGHER EDUCATION FOR | |
61 | - | STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES | |
13 | + | ONCERNING ESTABLISHING ACADEMI C ADJUSTMENTS FOR STUDENTS101 | |
14 | + | WITH DISABILITIES IN INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION .102 | |
15 | + | Bill Summary | |
16 | + | (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does | |
17 | + | not reflect any amendments that may be subsequently adopted. If this bill | |
18 | + | passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that | |
19 | + | applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at | |
20 | + | http://leg.colorado.gov | |
21 | + | .) | |
22 | + | The bill requires each institution of higher education (institution) | |
23 | + | in Colorado to create and adopt a policy and a process to support the | |
24 | + | ability of a student with a disability (student) to self-disclose the student's | |
25 | + | disability so the student can receive an academic adjustment from the | |
26 | + | institution. | |
27 | + | The adopted policy must, at a minimum, include information that: | |
28 | + | HOUSE | |
29 | + | 3rd Reading Unamended | |
30 | + | March 31, 2025 | |
31 | + | HOUSE | |
32 | + | Amended 2nd Reading | |
33 | + | March 28, 2025 | |
34 | + | SENATE | |
35 | + | 3rd Reading Unamended | |
36 | + | March 4, 2025 | |
37 | + | SENATE | |
38 | + | Amended 2nd Reading | |
39 | + | March 3, 2025 | |
40 | + | SENATE SPONSORSHIP | |
41 | + | Marchman, Ball, Coleman, Cutter, Danielson, Gonzales J., Hinrichsen, Jodeh, Kipp, | |
42 | + | Kolker, Michaelson Jenet, Roberts, Snyder, Sullivan, Weissman, Winter F. | |
43 | + | HOUSE SPONSORSHIP | |
44 | + | Stewart R. and Brooks, Boesenecker, Camacho, English, Froelich, Garcia, Hamrick, | |
45 | + | Jackson, Joseph, Lieder, Lukens, Martinez, McCluskie, Paschal, Ricks, Sirota, Soper, Stewart | |
46 | + | K., Story | |
47 | + | Shading denotes HOUSE amendment. Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment. | |
48 | + | Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law. | |
49 | + | Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law. ! Describes the institution's process to determine whether a | |
50 | + | student is eligible for an academic adjustment; | |
51 | + | ! Outlines documentation that the institution may request to | |
52 | + | determine whether a student is eligible for an academic | |
53 | + | adjustment; | |
54 | + | ! Provides information on the available disability resources | |
55 | + | and academic adjustments provided to students with | |
56 | + | disabilities; and | |
57 | + | ! Describes a grievance procedure for students who dispute | |
58 | + | a decision made by the institution. | |
59 | + | Each institution shall distribute the policy in an accessible format | |
60 | + | to applicants, students, parents, and faculty. The institution shall make the | |
61 | + | policy available: | |
62 | + | ! During the student application process; | |
63 | + | ! During student orientation; | |
64 | + | ! In academic catalogues; and | |
65 | + | ! On the institution's website. | |
66 | + | The bill describes the documentation that an admitted or enrolled | |
67 | + | student may submit to an institution to request an academic adjustment. | |
68 | + | Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:1 | |
69 | + | SECTION 1. Legislative declaration. (1) (a) The general2 | |
70 | + | assembly finds and declares that:3 | |
71 | + | (I) In accordance with federal law, Colorado law requires4 | |
72 | + | institutions of higher education to evaluate whether students with 5 | |
73 | + | disabilities qualify for an academic adjustment by reviewing6 | |
74 | + | documentation, including existing individualized education programs and7 | |
75 | + | section 504 plans;8 | |
76 | + | (II) While many institutions of higher education have review9 | |
77 | + | processes in place, inconsistencies and a lack of clarity in the review10 | |
78 | + | process and implementation of the review process may impede effective11 | |
79 | + | support for admitted or enrolled students with disabilities;12 | |
80 | + | (III) Based on feedback from students, faculty, and advocacy13 | |
81 | + | groups, there is a need for a clear, standardized process for institutions of14 | |
82 | + | 087-2- higher education to review documents, including existing individualized1 | |
83 | + | education programs and section 504 plans, to determine whether a student2 | |
84 | + | qualifies for an academic adjustment;3 | |
85 | + | (IV) Enhancing clarity and transparency in the document review4 | |
86 | + | process to determine whether students with disabilities qualify for5 | |
87 | + | academic adjustments will improve the academic success and the6 | |
88 | + | well-being of enrolled students with disabilities; and7 | |
89 | + | (V) This act creates a transparent document review process for8 | |
90 | + | students with disabilities to understand and determine whether they9 | |
91 | + | qualify for academic adjustments while maintaining the authority of10 | |
92 | + | institutions of higher education to make the final determination as to11 | |
93 | + | whether a student with a disability qualifies for academic adjustments.12 | |
94 | + | (b) The general assembly finds, therefore, that it is necessary to:13 | |
95 | + | (I) Clarify the processes institutions of higher education use to 14 | |
96 | + | review documentation, including existing individualized education15 | |
97 | + | programs and section 504 plans, to determine whether admitted or16 | |
98 | + | enrolled students with disabilities qualify for academic adjustments;17 | |
99 | + | (II) Ensure that the processes described in subsection (1)(b)(I) of18 | |
100 | + | this section do not create barriers for students with disabilities;19 | |
101 | + | (III) Implement accountability measures for an institution of20 | |
102 | + | higher education to fulfill its responsibilities by providing a description21 | |
103 | + | of the appeals process that focuses on documentary review; and22 | |
104 | + | (IV) Promote the alignment of state and federal law.23 | |
105 | + | SECTION 2. In Colorado Revised Statutes, add part 2 to article24 | |
106 | + | 1 of title 23 as follows:25 | |
107 | + | PART 226 | |
108 | + | ACADEMIC ADJUSTMENTS27 | |
109 | + | 087 | |
110 | + | -3- IN HIGHER EDUCATION FOR1 | |
111 | + | STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES2 | |
62 | 112 | 23-1-201. Definitions. A | |
63 | - | S USED IN THIS PART 2, UNLESS THE | |
64 | - | CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES | |
65 | - | : | |
113 | + | S USED IN THIS PART 2, UNLESS THE3 | |
114 | + | CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES :4 | |
66 | 115 | (1) "A | |
67 | - | CADEMIC ADJUSTMENT" MEANS MODIFICATIONS TO ACADEMIC | |
68 | - | REQUIREMENTS | |
69 | - | , AS DESCRIBED IN 34 CFR SEC. 104.44, TO ENSURE EQUAL | |
70 | - | EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES | |
71 | - | . "ACADEMIC ADJUSTMENT " DOES NOT | |
72 | - | INCLUDE CHANGES THAT FUNDAMENTALLY ALTER THE CONTENT OF | |
73 | - | ACADEMIC PROGRAMS | |
74 | - | . | |
116 | + | CADEMIC ADJUSTMENT " MEANS MODIFICATIONS TO | |
117 | + | 5 | |
118 | + | ACADEMIC REQUIREMENTS, AS DESCRIBED IN 34 C.F.R. SEC. 104.44, TO6 | |
119 | + | ENSURE EQUAL EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES. "ACADEMIC ADJUSTMENT"7 | |
120 | + | DOES NOT INCLUDE CHANGES THAT FUNDAMENTALLY ALTER THE CONTENT 8 | |
121 | + | OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMS .9 | |
75 | 122 | (2) "A | |
76 | - | MERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990" OR "ADA" | |
77 | - | MEANS THE FEDERAL "AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990", | |
123 | + | MERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990" OR "ADA"10 | |
124 | + | MEANS THE FEDERAL "AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990", 4211 | |
78 | 125 | U.S.C. | |
79 | - | SEC. 12101 ET SEQ. | |
126 | + | SEC. 12101 ET SEQ.12 | |
80 | 127 | (3) "I | |
81 | - | NDIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAM " OR "IEP" MEANS A | |
82 | - | WRITTEN STATEMENT FOR A STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY THAT IS | |
83 | - | DEVELOPED | |
84 | - | , REVIEWED, AND REVISED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FEDERAL | |
85 | - | "INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT", 20 U.S.C. SEC. 1400 ET | |
86 | - | SEQ | |
87 | - | . | |
128 | + | NDIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAM " OR "IEP" MEANS A13 | |
129 | + | WRITTEN STATEMENT FOR A STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY THAT IS14 | |
130 | + | DEVELOPED, REVIEWED, AND REVISED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FEDERAL15 | |
131 | + | "I | |
132 | + | NDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT", 20 U.S.C. SEC. 140016 | |
133 | + | ET SEQ.17 | |
88 | 134 | (4) "I | |
89 | - | NSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION " MEANS A STATE | |
90 | - | INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION | |
91 | - | , AS DEFINED IN SECTION 23-18-102, OR | |
92 | - | AN ACCREDITED CAMPUS OF A STATE INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION | |
93 | - | ; | |
94 | - | A PRIVATE INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION , AS DEFINED IN SECTION | |
95 | - | 23-18-102, THAT RECEIVES FEDERAL FUNDING; A LOCAL DISTRICT COLLEGE, | |
96 | - | AS DEFINED IN SECTION 23-71-102; OR AN AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE , AS | |
97 | - | DEFINED IN SECTION | |
98 | - | 23-60-103. | |
135 | + | NSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION " MEANS A STATE18 | |
136 | + | INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 23-18-102,19 | |
137 | + | OR AN ACCREDITED CAMPUS OF A STATE INSTITUTION OF HIGHER20 | |
138 | + | EDUCATION; A PRIVATE INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION, AS DEFINED21 | |
139 | + | IN SECTION 23-18-102, THAT RECEIVES FEDERAL FUNDING ; A LOCAL22 | |
140 | + | DISTRICT COLLEGE, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 23-71-102; OR AN AREA23 | |
141 | + | TECHNICAL COLLEGE, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 23-60-103.24 | |
99 | 142 | (5) "L | |
100 | - | OCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER " MEANS A SCHOOL DISTRICT, A | |
101 | - | CHARTER SCHOOL AUTHORIZED PURSUANT TO PART | |
102 | - | 1 OF ARTICLE 30.5 OF | |
103 | - | TITLE | |
104 | - | 22, AN INSTITUTE CHARTER SCHOOL AUTHORIZED BY THE STATE | |
105 | - | CHARTER SCHOOL INSTITUTE PURSUANT TO PART | |
106 | - | 5 OF ARTICLE 30.5 OF TITLE | |
107 | - | 22, A BOARD OF COOPERATIVE SERVICES CREATED AND OPERATING | |
108 | - | PURSUANT TO ARTICLE | |
109 | - | 5 OF TITLE 22, A PUBLIC AUTHORITY OR BOARD OF | |
110 | - | EDUCATION MANAGING A PUBLIC SCHOOL IN ANOTHER STATE | |
111 | - | , OR A FACILITY | |
112 | - | SCHOOL APPROVED PURSUANT TO SECTION | |
113 | - | 22-2-407. | |
114 | - | PAGE 3-SENATE BILL 25-087 (6) "SECTION 504" MEANS SECTION 504 OF THE FEDERAL | |
115 | - | "REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973", 29 U.S.C. SEC. 701 ET SEQ. | |
143 | + | OCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER" MEANS A SCHOOL DISTRICT, A25 | |
144 | + | CHARTER SCHOOL AUTHORIZED PURSUANT TO PART 1 OF ARTICLE 30.5 OF26 | |
145 | + | TITLE 22, AN INSTITUTE CHARTER SCHOOL AUTHORIZED BY THE STATE27 | |
146 | + | 087 | |
147 | + | -4- CHARTER SCHOOL INSTITUTE PURSUANT TO PART 5 OF ARTICLE 30.5 OF1 | |
148 | + | TITLE 22, A BOARD OF COOPERATIVE SERVICES CREATED AND OPERATING2 | |
149 | + | PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 5 OF TITLE 22, A PUBLIC AUTHORITY OR BOARD OF3 | |
150 | + | EDUCATION MANAGING A PUBLIC SCHOOL IN ANOTHER STATE , OR A4 | |
151 | + | FACILITY SCHOOL APPROVED PURSUANT TO SECTION 22-2-407.5 | |
152 | + | (6) "S | |
153 | + | ECTION 504" MEANS SECTION 504 OF THE FEDERAL6 | |
154 | + | "R | |
155 | + | EHABILITATION ACT OF 1973", 29 U.S.C. SEC. 701 ET SEQ.7 | |
116 | 156 | (7) "S | |
117 | - | ECTION 504 PLAN" MEANS A PLAN ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO | |
118 | - | SECTION | |
119 | - | 504 THAT PROVIDES GUIDANCE AND SUPPORT FOR A STUDENT WITH | |
120 | - | A DISABILITY | |
121 | - | . | |
157 | + | ECTION 504 PLAN" MEANS A PLAN ESTABLISHED PURSUANT8 | |
158 | + | TO SECTION 504 THAT PROVIDES GUIDANCE AND SUPPORT FOR A STUDENT9 | |
159 | + | WITH A DISABILITY.10 | |
122 | 160 | (8) "S | |
123 | - | TATE EDUCATION AGENCY " MEANS THE DEPARTMENT OF | |
124 | - | EDUCATION CREATED IN SECTION | |
125 | - | 24-1-115 OR AN AGENCY PRIMARILY | |
126 | - | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE SUPERVISION OF PUBLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS | |
127 | - | AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN ANOTHER STATE | |
128 | - | . | |
161 | + | TATE EDUCATION AGENCY " MEANS THE DEPARTMENT OF11 | |
162 | + | EDUCATION CREATED IN SECTION 24-1-115 OR AN AGENCY PRIMARILY12 | |
163 | + | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE SUPERVISION OF PUBLIC ELEMENTARY13 | |
164 | + | SCHOOLS AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN ANOTHER STATE .14 | |
129 | 165 | (9) "S | |
130 | - | TUDENT WITH A DISABILITY" MEANS | |
131 | - | ||
132 | - | "INDIVIDUAL | |
133 | - | A DISABILITY | |
134 | - | ||
135 | - | ACT OF 1990" OR PURSUANT TO SECTION 504. | |
136 | - | 23-1-202. Policy - process - students with disabilities - | |
166 | + | TUDENT WITH A DISABILITY" MEANS | |
167 | + | AN ADMITTED OR AN15 | |
168 | + | ENROLLED STUDENT WHO MEETS THE DEFINITION OF AN "INDIVIDUAL WITH16 | |
169 | + | A DISABILITY" PURSUANT TO THE FEDERAL "AMERICANS WITH17 | |
170 | + | D | |
171 | + | ISABILITIES ACT OF 1990" OR PURSUANT TO SECTION 504.18 | |
172 | + | 23-1-202. Policy - process - students with disabilities -19 | |
137 | 173 | dissemination of policy. (1) E | |
138 | - | ACH INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION | |
139 | - | SHALL CREATE AND ADOPT A POLICY AND A PROCESS TO SUPPORT THE | |
140 | - | ABILITY OF A STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY TO VOLUNTARILY SELF | |
141 | - | -DISCLOSE | |
142 | - | THE STUDENT | |
143 | - | 'S DISABILITY AND TO ENGAGE IN AN INTERACTIVE PROCESS | |
144 | - | WITH THE INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION TO RECEIVE AN ACADEMIC | |
145 | - | ADJUSTMENT | |
146 | - | . | |
174 | + | ACH INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION20 | |
175 | + | SHALL CREATE AND ADOPT A POLICY AND A PROCESS TO SUPPORT THE21 | |
176 | + | ABILITY OF A STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY TO VOLUNTARILY | |
177 | + | 22 | |
178 | + | SELF-DISCLOSE THE STUDENT 'S DISABILITY AND TO ENGAGE IN AN23 | |
179 | + | INTERACTIVE PROCESS WITH THE INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION TO24 | |
180 | + | RECEIVE AN ACADEMIC ADJUSTMENT .25 | |
147 | 181 | (2) T | |
148 | - | HE POLICY CREATED AND ADOPTED | |
149 | - | (1) | |
150 | - | ||
151 | - | ||
152 | - | ||
153 | - | ||
154 | - | ; | |
182 | + | HE POLICY CREATED AND ADOPTED PURS UANT TO SUBSECTION26 | |
183 | + | (1) | |
184 | + | OF THIS SECTION MUST, AT A MINIMUM, INCLUDE INFORMATION THAT:27 | |
185 | + | 087 | |
186 | + | -5- (a) DESCRIBES THE PROCESS THE INSTITUTION OF HIGHER1 | |
187 | + | EDUCATION USES TO DETERMINE WHETHER A STUDENT IS ELIGIBLE FOR AN2 | |
188 | + | ACADEMIC ADJUSTMENT ;3 | |
155 | 189 | (b) O | |
156 | - | UTLINES THE DOCUMENTATION DESCRIBED IN SECTION 23-1-203 | |
157 | - | (2) | |
158 | - | THAT THE INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION MAY REQUEST TO | |
159 | - | DETERMINE WHETHER A STUDENT IS ELIGIBLE FOR AN ACADEMIC | |
160 | - | ADJUSTMENT | |
161 | - | ; | |
190 | + | UTLINES THE DOCUMENTATION DESCRIBED IN SECTION4 | |
191 | + | 23-1-203 | |
192 | + | (2) THAT THE INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION MAY REQUEST5 | |
193 | + | TO DETERMINE WHETHER A STUDENT IS ELIGIBLE FOR AN ACADEMIC6 | |
194 | + | ADJUSTMENT;7 | |
162 | 195 | (c) P | |
163 | - | ROVIDES INFORMATION ON THE AVAILABLE | |
164 | - | RESOURCES AND ACADEMIC ADJUSTMENTS PROVIDED TO STUDENTS | |
165 | - | DISABILITIES | |
166 | - | ||
167 | - | ||
168 | - | ||
169 | - | . | |
196 | + | ROVIDES INFORMATION ON THE AVAILABLE DISABILITY8 | |
197 | + | RESOURCES AND ACADEMIC ADJUSTMENTS PROVIDED TO STUDENTS WITH9 | |
198 | + | DISABILITIES; AND10 | |
199 | + | (d) D | |
200 | + | ESCRIBES AN APPEALS PROCESS FOR ACADEMIC ADJUSTMENT | |
201 | + | 11 | |
202 | + | DECISIONS THAT FOCUSES ON DOCUMENTARY REVIEW .12 | |
170 | 203 | (3) E | |
171 | 204 | ACH INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION SHALL PUBLISH THE | |
172 | - | POLICY DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION | |
173 | - | (1) OF THIS SECTION ON THE INSTITUTION | |
174 | - | OF HIGHER EDUCATION | |
175 | - | 'S WEBSITE IN AN ACCESSIBLE FORMAT. | |
205 | + | 13 | |
206 | + | POLICY DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (1) OF THIS SECTION ON THE14 | |
207 | + | INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION'S WEBSITE IN AN ACCESSIBLE FORMAT.15 | |
176 | 208 | 23-1-203. Academic adjustments - documentation. (1) A | |
177 | - | N | |
178 | - | INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION MAY REQUEST DOCUMENTATION | |
179 | - | , AS | |
180 | - | DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION | |
181 | - | (2) OF THIS SECTION, TO DETERMINE WHETHER A | |
182 | - | STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY IS ELIGIBLE FOR AN ACADEMIC ADJUSTMENT | |
183 | - | . | |
184 | - | (2) A | |
185 | - | S PART OF ITS REVIEW TO DETERMINE WHETHER A STUDENT | |
186 | - | WITH A DISABILITY IS ELIGIBLE FOR AN ACADEMIC ADJUSTMENT AS | |
187 | - | DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION | |
188 | - | (1) OF THIS SECTION, AN INSTITUTION OF HIGHER | |
189 | - | EDUCATION MAY CONSIDER ONE OF THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS TO | |
190 | - | SUBSTANTIATE THE STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY | |
191 | - | 'S REQUEST FOR AN | |
192 | - | ACADEMIC ADJUSTMENT | |
193 | - | : | |
209 | + | N16 | |
210 | + | INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION MAY REQUEST DOCUMENTATION , AS17 | |
211 | + | DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (2) OF THIS SECTION, TO DETERMINE WHETHER18 | |
212 | + | A STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY IS ELIGIBLE FOR AN ACADEMIC19 | |
213 | + | ADJUSTMENT.20(2) AS PART OF ITS REVIEW TO DETERMINE WHETHER A STUDENT21 | |
214 | + | WITH A DISABILITY IS ELIGIBLE FOR AN ACADEMIC ADJUSTMENT AS22 | |
215 | + | DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (1) OF THIS SECTION, AN INSTITUTION OF23 | |
216 | + | HIGHER EDUCATION MAY CONSIDER ONE OF THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS24 | |
217 | + | TO SUBSTANTIATE THE STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY'S REQUEST FOR AN25 | |
218 | + | ACADEMIC ADJUSTMENT :26 | |
194 | 219 | (a) D | |
195 | - | OCUMENTATION THAT THE STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY | |
196 | - | ||
197 | - | ||
198 | - | . THE IEP DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY QUALIFY | |
199 | - | A DISABILITY FOR AN ACADEMIC ADJUSTMENT IN | |
200 | - | IEP LACKS RELEVANT DIAGNOSTIC DETAILS OR | |
201 | - | STUDENT | |
202 | - | ||
220 | + | OCUMENTATION THAT THE STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY HAS27 | |
221 | + | 087 | |
222 | + | -6- OR HAD AN INDIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAM THAT INCLUDES A1 | |
223 | + | STATED DISABILITY. THE IEP DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY QUALIFY A2 | |
224 | + | STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY FOR AN ACADEMIC ADJUSTMENT IN HIGHER3 | |
225 | + | EDUCATION IF THE IEP LACKS RELEVANT DIAGNOSTIC DETAILS OR DOES4 | |
226 | + | NOT DESCRIBE HOW THE STUDENT 'S DISABILITY LIMITS ONE OR MORE5 | |
227 | + | MAJOR LIFE ACTIVITIES.6 | |
203 | 228 | (b) D | |
204 | - | OCUMENTATION THAT THE STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY | |
205 | - | RECEIVED SERVICES OR REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS PURSUANT TO A | |
206 | - | SECTION | |
207 | - | 504 PLAN THAT INCLUDES A STATED DISABILITY. THE SECTION 504 | |
208 | - | PLAN DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY QUALIFY A STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY | |
209 | - | FOR AN ACADEMIC ADJUSTMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION IF THE SECTION | |
229 | + | OCUMENTATION THAT THE STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY7 | |
230 | + | RECEIVED SERVICES OR REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS PURSUANT TO A8 | |
231 | + | SECTION 504 PLAN THAT INCLUDES A STATED DISABILITY . THE SECTION | |
232 | + | 9 | |
210 | 233 | 504 | |
211 | - | PLAN LACKS RELEVANT DIAGNOSTIC DETAILS OR DOES NOT DESCRIBE HOW | |
212 | - | THE STUDENT | |
213 | - | 'S DISABILITY LIMITS ONE OR MORE MAJOR LIFE ACTIVITIES. | |
234 | + | PLAN DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY QUALIFY A STUDENT WITH A | |
235 | + | 10 | |
236 | + | DISABILITY FOR AN ACADEMIC ADJUSTMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION IF THE11 | |
237 | + | SECTION 504 PLAN LACKS RELEVANT DIAGNOSTIC DETAILS OR DOES NOT12 | |
238 | + | DESCRIBE HOW THE STUDENT 'S DISABILITY LIMITS ONE OR MORE MAJOR13 | |
239 | + | LIFE ACTIVITIES.14 | |
214 | 240 | (c) D | |
215 | - | OCUMENTATION OF A PLAN OR RECORD OF SERVICE FROM A | |
216 | - | PRIVATE SCHOOL | |
217 | - | , A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER , AN INDIAN TRIBE OR | |
218 | - | TRIBAL ORGANIZATION | |
219 | - | , A STATE EDUCATION AGENCY, OR AN INSTITUTION | |
220 | - | OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROVIDED PURSUANT TO SECTION | |
221 | - | 504 OR IN | |
222 | - | ACCORDANCE WITH THE | |
223 | - | ADA; | |
224 | - | PAGE 5-SENATE BILL 25-087 (d) DOCUMENTATION OF A RECORD OR EVALUATION FROM A | |
225 | - | QUALIFIED HEALTH | |
226 | - | -CARE PROVIDER WHO IS KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT THE | |
227 | - | STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY THAT CONFIRMS THAT THE STUDENT HAS A | |
228 | - | DISABILITY | |
229 | - | ; | |
241 | + | OCUMENTATION OF A PLAN OR RECORD OF SERVICE FROM A15 | |
242 | + | PRIVATE SCHOOL, A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER , AN INDIAN TRIBE OR16 | |
243 | + | TRIBAL ORGANIZATION, A STATE EDUCATION AGENCY, OR AN INSTITUTION17 | |
244 | + | OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROVIDED PURSUANT TO SECTION 504 OR IN18 | |
245 | + | ACCORDANCE WITH THE ADA;19 | |
246 | + | (d) D | |
247 | + | OCUMENTATION OF A RECORD OR EVALUATION FROM A20 | |
248 | + | QUALIFIED HEALTH-CARE PROVIDER WHO IS KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT THE21 | |
249 | + | STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY THAT CONFIRMS THAT THE STUDENT HAS A22 | |
250 | + | DISABILITY;23 | |
230 | 251 | (e) D | |
231 | - | OCUMENTATION OF A PLAN OR RECORD FROM | |
232 | - | INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION THAT DETERMINED THE | |
233 | - | A DISABILITY WHO IS APPLYING FOR AN ACADEMIC ADJUSTMENT | |
234 | - | QUALIFYING DISABILITY | |
235 | - | ||
236 | - | (f) | |
237 | - | ||
238 | - | (g) | |
239 | - | ||
240 | - | ||
241 | - | ||
242 | - | (2)(a) TO (2)(f) OF | |
243 | - | ||
244 | - | ||
245 | - | ||
246 | - | ||
247 | - | . | |
252 | + | OCUMENTATION OF A PLAN OR RECORD FROM ANOTHER24 | |
253 | + | INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION THAT DETERMINED THE STUDENT25 | |
254 | + | WITH A DISABILITY WHO IS APPLYING FOR AN ACADEMIC ADJUSTMENT HAD26 | |
255 | + | A QUALIFYING DISABILITY;27 | |
256 | + | 087 | |
257 | + | -7- (f) DOCUMENTATION OF A DISABILITY DUE TO MILITARY SERVICE ;1 | |
258 | + | OR2 | |
259 | + | (g) A | |
260 | + | DDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM A QUALIFIED HEALTH -CARE3 | |
261 | + | PROVIDER WHO IS KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT THE STUDENT WITH A4 | |
262 | + | DISABILITY AND CAN CLARIFY THE NEED FOR AN ACADEMIC ADJUSTMENT5 | |
263 | + | THAT MAY NOT BE ADDRESSED IN SUBSECTIONS (2)(a) TO (2)(f) OF THIS6 | |
264 | + | SECTION.7 | |
265 | + | (3) (a) | |
266 | + | AN INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION MAY ESTABLISH8 | |
267 | + | LESS BURDENSOME DOCUMENTATION CRITERIA TO DETERMINE WHETHER9 | |
268 | + | A STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY MAY RECEIVE AN ACADEMIC ADJUSTMENT .10 | |
248 | 269 | (b) A | |
249 | - | N INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION MAY REQUEST | |
250 | - | ||
251 | - | : | |
270 | + | N INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION MAY REQUEST | |
271 | + | 11 | |
272 | + | UPDATED DOCUMENTATION IF A STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY :12 | |
252 | 273 | (I) S | |
253 | 274 | UBMITS DOCUMENTATION THAT LACKS REASONABLE DETAIL ; | |
275 | + | 13 | |
254 | 276 | (II) S | |
255 | 277 | UBMITS DOCUMENTATION THAT IS OUTDATED BASED ON A | |
256 | - | DIAGNOSIS THAT HAS CHANGED | |
257 | - | ; OR | |
258 | - | (III) REQUESTS SUBSTANTIALLY NEW ACADEMIC ADJUSTMENTS . | |
278 | + | 14 | |
279 | + | DIAGNOSIS THAT HAS CHANGED ; OR15 | |
280 | + | (III) R | |
281 | + | EQUESTS SUBSTANTIALLY NEW ACADEMIC ADJUSTMENTS . | |
282 | + | 16 | |
259 | 283 | (4) T | |
260 | 284 | HIS PART 2 DOES NOT OVERRIDE FEDERAL LAW . | |
261 | - | SECTION 3. Act subject to petition - effective date. This act | |
262 | - | takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day following the expiration of the | |
263 | - | ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly; except | |
264 | - | that, if a referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3) of article V | |
265 | - | of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act | |
266 | - | within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect | |
267 | - | unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in | |
268 | - | PAGE 6-SENATE BILL 25-087 November 2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the official | |
269 | - | declaration of the vote thereon by the governor. | |
270 | - | ____________________________ ____________________________ | |
271 | - | James Rashad Coleman, Sr. Julie McCluskie | |
272 | - | PRESIDENT OF SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE | |
273 | - | THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES | |
274 | - | ____________________________ ____________________________ | |
275 | - | Esther van Mourik Vanessa Reilly | |
276 | - | SECRETARY OF CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE | |
277 | - | THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES | |
278 | - | APPROVED________________________________________ | |
279 | - | (Date and Time) | |
280 | - | _________________________________________ | |
281 | - | Jared S. Polis | |
282 | - | GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO | |
283 | - | PAGE 7-SENATE BILL 25-087 | |
285 | + | 17 | |
286 | + | SECTION 3. Act subject to petition - effective date. This act18 | |
287 | + | takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day following the expiration of the19 | |
288 | + | ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly; except20 | |
289 | + | that, if a referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3) of article V21 | |
290 | + | of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this22 | |
291 | + | act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take23 | |
292 | + | effect unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in24 | |
293 | + | November 2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the25 | |
294 | + | official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.26 | |
295 | + | 087 | |
296 | + | -8- |