5 | | - | ONCERNING THE CREATION OF THE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY IN CRIMINAL |
---|
6 | | - | CASES TASK FORCE |
---|
7 | | - | . |
---|
8 | | - | |
---|
9 | | - | Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado: |
---|
10 | | - | SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, add 16-18-106 as |
---|
11 | | - | follows: |
---|
12 | | - | 16-18-106. Electronic discovery in criminal cases task force - |
---|
| 13 | + | ONCERNING THE CREATION OF THE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY IN101 |
---|
| 14 | + | CRIMINAL CASES TASK FORCE .102 |
---|
| 15 | + | Bill Summary |
---|
| 16 | + | (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does |
---|
| 17 | + | not reflect any amendments that may be subsequently adopted. If this bill |
---|
| 18 | + | passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that |
---|
| 19 | + | applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at |
---|
| 20 | + | http://leg.colorado.gov/ |
---|
| 21 | + | .) |
---|
| 22 | + | Joint Budget Committee. The bill creates the electronic discovery |
---|
| 23 | + | in criminal cases task force (task force), which consists of 13 task force |
---|
| 24 | + | members. The purpose of the task force is to study the costs and |
---|
| 25 | + | management of electronic discovery in criminal cases. |
---|
| 26 | + | HOUSE |
---|
| 27 | + | 2nd Reading Unamended |
---|
| 28 | + | April 9, 2025 |
---|
| 29 | + | SENATE |
---|
| 30 | + | 3rd Reading Unamended |
---|
| 31 | + | April 3, 2025 |
---|
| 32 | + | SENATE |
---|
| 33 | + | 2nd Reading Unamended |
---|
| 34 | + | April 2, 2025 |
---|
| 35 | + | SENATE SPONSORSHIP |
---|
| 36 | + | Bridges and Kirkmeyer, Amabile, Roberts, Weissman |
---|
| 37 | + | HOUSE SPONSORSHIP |
---|
| 38 | + | Bird and Taggart, Sirota |
---|
| 39 | + | Shading denotes HOUSE amendment. Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment. |
---|
| 40 | + | Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law. |
---|
| 41 | + | Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:1 |
---|
| 42 | + | SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, add 16-18-106 as2 |
---|
| 43 | + | follows:3 |
---|
| 44 | + | 16-18-106. Electronic discovery in criminal cases task force -4 |
---|
25 | | - | HE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COLORADO DISTRICT |
---|
26 | | - | NOTE: This bill has been prepared for the signatures of the appropriate legislative |
---|
27 | | - | officers and the Governor. To determine whether the Governor has signed the bill |
---|
28 | | - | or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative |
---|
29 | | - | history, or the Session Laws. |
---|
30 | | - | ________ |
---|
31 | | - | Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law; dashes |
---|
32 | | - | through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of |
---|
33 | | - | the act. ATTORNEYS' COUNCIL, OR THE DIRECTOR'S DESIGNEE, WHO IS THE CHAIR OF |
---|
34 | | - | THE TASK FORCE |
---|
35 | | - | ; |
---|
| 55 | + | HE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COLORADO DISTRICT11 |
---|
| 56 | + | ATTORNEYS' COUNCIL, OR THE DIRECTOR'S DESIGNEE, WHO IS THE CHAIR12 |
---|
| 57 | + | OF THE TASK FORCE;13 |
---|
43 | | - | N ATTORNEY EMPLOYED BY , OR UNDER CONTRACT WITH, THE |
---|
44 | | - | OFFICE OF ALTERNATE DEFENSE COUNSEL |
---|
45 | | - | , APPOINTED BY THE OFFICE OF |
---|
46 | | - | ALTERNATE DEFENSE COUNSEL |
---|
47 | | - | ; |
---|
| 63 | + | N ATTORNEY EMPLOYED BY, OR UNDER CONTRACT WITH, THE17 |
---|
| 64 | + | OFFICE OF ALTERNATE DEFENSE COUNSEL , APPOINTED BY THE OFFICE OF18 |
---|
| 65 | + | ALTERNATE DEFENSE COUNSEL ;19 |
---|
53 | | - | NE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYED BY |
---|
54 | | - | THE |
---|
55 | | - | COLORADO DISTRICT ATTORNEYS ' COUNCIL, AND ONE DISTRICT |
---|
56 | | - | ATTORNEY WHO HAS KNOWLEDGE OF ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY |
---|
57 | | - | , APPOINTED |
---|
58 | | - | BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE |
---|
59 | | - | COLORADO DISTRICT ATTORNEYS ' |
---|
60 | | - | COUNCIL; |
---|
| 70 | + | NE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYED BY22 |
---|
| 71 | + | THE COLORADO DISTRICT ATTORNEYS ' COUNCIL, AND ONE DISTRICT23 |
---|
| 72 | + | ATTORNEY WHO HAS KNOWLEDGE OF ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY , APPOINTED24 |
---|
| 73 | + | BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COLORADO DISTRICT ATTORNEYS '25 |
---|
| 74 | + | COUNCIL;26 |
---|
80 | | - | N EMPLOYEE OF THE COLORADO STATE PATROL WHO HAS |
---|
81 | | - | KNOWLEDGE OF ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY |
---|
82 | | - | , APPOINTED BY THE CHIEF OF THE |
---|
83 | | - | COLORADO STATE PATROL; AND |
---|
84 | | - | (j) A COUNTY COMMISSIONER WHO HAS KNOWLEDGE OF LOCAL |
---|
85 | | - | ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY COSTS AND LOCAL CONTRACTS RELATED TO |
---|
86 | | - | ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY |
---|
87 | | - | , APPOINTED BY COLORADO COUNTIES , |
---|
88 | | - | INCORPORATED. |
---|
89 | | - | PAGE 2-SENATE BILL 25-240 (4) (a) THE APPOINTING AUTHORITIES SHALL APPOINT MEMBERS TO |
---|
90 | | - | THE TASK FORCE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS |
---|
91 | | - | SECTION AND PROMPTLY NOTIFY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE |
---|
92 | | - | COLORADO DISTRICT ATTORNEYS ' COUNCIL OF THE APPOINTMENT. |
---|
| 89 | + | N EMPLOYEE OF THE COLORADO STATE PATROL WHO HAS9 |
---|
| 90 | + | KNOWLEDGE OF ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY , APPOINTED BY THE CHIEF OF THE10 |
---|
| 91 | + | C |
---|
| 92 | + | OLORADO STATE PATROL; AND11 |
---|
| 93 | + | (j) A |
---|
| 94 | + | COUNTY COMMISSIONER WHO HAS KNOWLEDGE OF LOCAL12 |
---|
| 95 | + | ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY COSTS AND LOCAL CONTRACTS RELATED TO13 |
---|
| 96 | + | ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY , APPOINTED BY COLORADO COUNTIES ,14 |
---|
| 97 | + | INCORPORATED.15 |
---|
| 98 | + | (4) (a) T |
---|
| 99 | + | HE APPOINTING AUTHORITIES SHALL APPOINT MEMBERS TO16 |
---|
| 100 | + | THE TASK FORCE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS17 |
---|
| 101 | + | SECTION AND PROMPTLY NOTIFY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE18 |
---|
| 102 | + | C |
---|
| 103 | + | OLORADO DISTRICT ATTORNEYS ' COUNCIL OF THE APPOINTMENT.19 |
---|
117 | | - | OMMUNICATE WITH AND OBTAIN INPUT FROM LAW |
---|
118 | | - | ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES |
---|
119 | | - | , PROSECUTORS, AND DEFENSE ATTORNEYS |
---|
120 | | - | THROUGHOUT THE STATE AFFECTED BY THE ISSUES IDENTIFIED IN |
---|
121 | | - | SUBSECTION |
---|
122 | | - | (6) OF THIS SECTION; AND |
---|
123 | | - | (d) CREATE SUBCOMMITTEES, AS NEEDED, TO CARRY OUT THE DUTIES |
---|
124 | | - | OF THE TASK FORCE |
---|
125 | | - | . THE SUBCOMMITTEES MAY CONSIST , IN PART, OF |
---|
126 | | - | PERSONS WHO ARE NOT MEMBERS OF THE TASK FORCE AND WHO MAY VOTE |
---|
127 | | - | ON ISSUES BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE BUT WHO ARE NOT ENTITLED TO A |
---|
128 | | - | VOTE AT TASK FORCE MEETINGS |
---|
129 | | - | . |
---|
| 123 | + | OMMUNICATE WITH AND OBTAIN INPUT FROM LAW5 |
---|
| 124 | + | ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES , PROSECUTORS, AND DEFENSE ATTORNEYS6 |
---|
| 125 | + | THROUGHOUT THE STATE AFFECTED BY THE ISSUES IDENTIFIED IN7 |
---|
| 126 | + | SUBSECTION (6) OF THIS SECTION; AND8 |
---|
| 127 | + | (d) C |
---|
| 128 | + | REATE SUBCOMMITTEES , AS NEEDED, TO CARRY OUT THE9 |
---|
| 129 | + | DUTIES OF THE TASK FORCE. THE SUBCOMMITTEES MAY CONSIST , IN PART,10 |
---|
| 130 | + | OF PERSONS WHO ARE NOT MEMBERS OF THE TASK FORCE AND WHO MAY11 |
---|
| 131 | + | VOTE ON ISSUES BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE BUT WHO ARE NOT ENTITLED12 |
---|
| 132 | + | TO A VOTE AT TASK FORCE MEETINGS.13 |
---|
135 | | - | HE CURRENT CONTRACTS IN PLACE BETWEEN A LAW |
---|
136 | | - | ENFORCEMENT AGENCY |
---|
137 | | - | , A DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, THE OFFICE OF THE |
---|
138 | | - | ATTORNEY GENERAL |
---|
139 | | - | , THE OFFICE OF STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER, THE OFFICE |
---|
140 | | - | PAGE 3-SENATE BILL 25-240 OF ALTERNATE DEFENSE COUNSEL , OR, IF AVAILABLE, PRIVATE CRIMINAL |
---|
141 | | - | DEFENSE ATTORNEYS AND A VENDOR FOR ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY SERVICES |
---|
142 | | - | AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES |
---|
143 | | - | , AND INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING |
---|
144 | | - | INFORMATION REGARDING EACH CONTRACT |
---|
145 | | - | : |
---|
| 137 | + | HE CURRENT CONTRACTS IN PLACE BETWEEN A LAW16 |
---|
| 138 | + | ENFORCEMENT AGENCY , A DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, THE OFFICE OF17 |
---|
| 139 | + | THE ATTORNEY GENERAL , THE OFFICE OF STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER, THE18 |
---|
| 140 | + | OFFICE OF ALTERNATE DEFENSE COUNSEL , OR, IF AVAILABLE, PRIVATE19 |
---|
| 141 | + | CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS AND A VENDOR FOR ELECTRONIC20 |
---|
| 142 | + | DISCOVERY SERVICES AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES , AND21 |
---|
| 143 | + | INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION REGARDING EACH CONTRACT :22 |
---|
151 | | - | HE TERMS, CONTRACTED SERVICES, LICENSING REQUIREMENTS, |
---|
152 | | - | AND ANY OTHER KEY COMPONENT OF THE CONTRACT ; AND |
---|
153 | | - | (IV) THE EXPECTED FUTURE COSTS OF THE CONTRACT , IF KNOWN; |
---|
| 149 | + | HE TERMS, CONTRACTED SERVICES , LICENSING25 |
---|
| 150 | + | REQUIREMENTS, AND ANY OTHER KEY COMPONENT OF THE CONTRACT ;26 |
---|
| 151 | + | AND27 |
---|
| 152 | + | 240 |
---|
| 153 | + | -4- (IV) THE EXPECTED FUTURE COSTS OF THE CONTRACT , IF KNOWN;1 |
---|
159 | | - | HE NUMBER, SIZE, AND TYPE OF FILES PLACED INTO THE |
---|
160 | | - | STATEWIDE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY PORTAL THAT CAN BE FULLY |
---|
161 | | - | DOWNLOADED |
---|
162 | | - | , ACCESSED, OR UTILIZED THROUGH THE ELECTRONIC |
---|
163 | | - | DISCOVERY PORTAL |
---|
164 | | - | ; |
---|
| 158 | + | HE NUMBER, SIZE, AND TYPE OF FILES PLACED INTO THE4 |
---|
| 159 | + | STATEWIDE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY PORTAL THAT CAN BE FULLY5 |
---|
| 160 | + | DOWNLOADED, ACCESSED, OR UTILIZED THROUGH THE ELECTRONIC6 |
---|
| 161 | + | DISCOVERY PORTAL;7 |
---|
166 | | - | HE NUMBER, SIZE, AND TYPE OF FILES THAT REQUIRE |
---|
167 | | - | PROSECUTION AND DEFENSE TO USE AN OUTSIDE VENDOR OR WEBSITE TO |
---|
168 | | - | FULLY DOWNLOAD |
---|
169 | | - | , ACCESS, OR UTILIZE THE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY |
---|
170 | | - | DOCUMENTS |
---|
171 | | - | ; AND |
---|
172 | | - | (III) THE NUMBER, SIZE, AND TYPE OF FILES THAT ARE PLACED ON |
---|
173 | | - | PHYSICAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVICES SUCH AS FLASH DRIVES |
---|
174 | | - | , |
---|
175 | | - | EXTERNAL HARD DRIVES, OR PHYSICAL COPIES IN ORDER FOR PROSECUTION |
---|
176 | | - | AND DEFENSE TO ACCESS AND UTILIZE THE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY |
---|
177 | | - | DOCUMENTS |
---|
178 | | - | ; |
---|
| 163 | + | HE NUMBER, SIZE, AND TYPE OF FILES THAT REQUIRE8 |
---|
| 164 | + | PROSECUTION AND DEFENSE TO USE AN OUTSIDE VENDOR OR WEBSITE TO9 |
---|
| 165 | + | FULLY DOWNLOAD, ACCESS, OR UTILIZE THE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY10 |
---|
| 166 | + | DOCUMENTS; AND11 |
---|
| 167 | + | (III) T |
---|
| 168 | + | HE NUMBER, SIZE, AND TYPE OF FILES THAT ARE PLACED ON12 |
---|
| 169 | + | PHYSICAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVICES SUCH AS FLASH DRIVES ,13 |
---|
| 170 | + | EXTERNAL HARD DRIVES, OR PHYSICAL COPIES IN ORDER FOR PROSECUTION14 |
---|
| 171 | + | AND DEFENSE TO ACCESS AND UTILIZE THE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY15 |
---|
| 172 | + | DOCUMENTS;16 |
---|
180 | | - | HE EXTENT TO WHICH PROSECUTORS , PUBLIC DEFENDERS, |
---|
181 | | - | ALTERNATE DEFENSE COUNSEL ATTORNEYS , PRIVATE DEFENSE ATTORNEYS, |
---|
182 | | - | AND PRO SE DEFENDANTS HAVE EQUITABLE ACCESS AND THE ABILITY TO |
---|
183 | | - | REVIEW AND UTILIZE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY DOCUMENTS COMPARED TO |
---|
184 | | - | OTHER PROSECUTORS |
---|
185 | | - | , PUBLIC DEFENDERS, ALTERNATE DEFENSE COUNSEL |
---|
186 | | - | ATTORNEYS |
---|
187 | | - | , PRIVATE DEFENSE ATTORNEYS , AND PRO SE DEFENDANTS , |
---|
188 | | - | INCLUDING: |
---|
189 | | - | PAGE 4-SENATE BILL 25-240 (I) THE TIME IT TAKES TO DOWNLOAD INFORMATION TO VIEW ; |
---|
| 174 | + | HE EXTENT TO WHICH PROSECUTORS , PUBLIC DEFENDERS,17 |
---|
| 175 | + | ALTERNATE DEFENSE COUNSEL ATTORNEYS , PRIVATE DEFENSE18 |
---|
| 176 | + | ATTORNEYS, AND PRO SE DEFENDANTS HAVE EQUITABLE ACCESS AND THE19 |
---|
| 177 | + | ABILITY TO REVIEW AND UTILIZE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY DOCUMENTS20 |
---|
| 178 | + | COMPARED TO OTHER PROSECUTORS , PUBLIC DEFENDERS, ALTERNATE21 |
---|
| 179 | + | DEFENSE COUNSEL ATTORNEYS , PRIVATE DEFENSE ATTORNEYS, AND PRO22 |
---|
| 180 | + | SE DEFENDANTS, INCLUDING:23 |
---|
| 181 | + | (I) T |
---|
| 182 | + | HE TIME IT TAKES TO DOWNLOAD INFORMATION TO VIEW ;24 |
---|
195 | | - | HE ABILITY TO SEE AUTOMATED TRANSCRIPTIONS , USE |
---|
196 | | - | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO GENERATE TRANSCRIPTIONS |
---|
197 | | - | , OR USE ANY |
---|
198 | | - | OTHER TOOLS TO EXPEDITE REVIEW OF DISCOVERY DOCUMENTS |
---|
199 | | - | ; AND |
---|
200 | | - | (IV) THE ABILITY TO IDENTIFY WHICH OFFICER THE BODY CAMERA |
---|
201 | | - | FOOTAGE IS FROM OR THE ABILITY TO IDENTIFY WHERE ANOTHER SOURCE OF |
---|
202 | | - | VIDEO FOOTAGE WAS TAKEN FROM |
---|
203 | | - | ; |
---|
| 187 | + | HE ABILITY TO SEE AUTOMATED TRANSCRIPTIONS , USE27 |
---|
| 188 | + | 240 |
---|
| 189 | + | -5- ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO GENERATE TRANSCRIPTIONS , OR USE ANY1 |
---|
| 190 | + | OTHER TOOLS TO EXPEDITE REVIEW OF DISCOVERY DOCUMENTS ; AND2 |
---|
| 191 | + | (IV) T |
---|
| 192 | + | HE ABILITY TO IDENTIFY WHICH OFFICER THE BODY CAMERA3 |
---|
| 193 | + | FOOTAGE IS FROM OR THE ABILITY TO IDENTIFY WHERE ANOTHER SOURCE4 |
---|
| 194 | + | OF VIDEO FOOTAGE WAS TAKEN FROM ;5 |
---|
205 | | - | OW THE AMOUNT AND TYPE OF INFORMATION PLACED INTO |
---|
206 | | - | ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY HAS CHANGED SINCE THE CREATION OF THE |
---|
207 | | - | STATEWIDE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY PORTAL AND |
---|
208 | | - | , TO THE EXTENT KNOWN, |
---|
209 | | - | HOW ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY IS PROJECTED TO CHANGE OVER THE NEXT TEN |
---|
210 | | - | YEARS |
---|
211 | | - | ; |
---|
| 196 | + | OW THE AMOUNT AND TYPE OF INFORMATION PLACED INTO6 |
---|
| 197 | + | ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY HAS CHANGED SINCE THE CREATION OF THE7 |
---|
| 198 | + | STATEWIDE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY PORTAL AND , TO THE EXTENT8 |
---|
| 199 | + | KNOWN, HOW ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY IS PROJECTED TO CHANGE OVER9 |
---|
| 200 | + | THE NEXT TEN YEARS;10 |
---|
221 | | - | HE POSSIBLE COORDINATION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES , |
---|
222 | | - | PROSECUTING AGENCIES, THE OFFICE OF STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER , THE |
---|
223 | | - | OFFICE OF ALTERNATE DEFENSE COUNSEL |
---|
224 | | - | , AND PRIVATE DEFENSE ATTORNEY |
---|
225 | | - | CONTRACTS TO MAKE THE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY PROCESS MORE EFFICIENT |
---|
226 | | - | AND EQUITABLE |
---|
227 | | - | , AVOID OR MINIMIZE THE NEED FOR OUTSIDE VENDORS , AND |
---|
228 | | - | BETTER CONTROL COSTS |
---|
229 | | - | ; |
---|
| 207 | + | HE POSSIBLE COORDINATION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT15 |
---|
| 208 | + | AGENCIES, PROSECUTING AGENCIES , THE OFFICE OF STATE PUBLIC16 |
---|
| 209 | + | DEFENDER, THE OFFICE OF ALTERNATE DEFENSE COUNSEL , AND PRIVATE17 |
---|
| 210 | + | DEFENSE ATTORNEY CONTRACTS TO MAKE THE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY18 |
---|
| 211 | + | PROCESS MORE EFFICIENT AND EQUITABLE , AVOID OR MINIMIZE THE NEED19 |
---|
| 212 | + | FOR OUTSIDE VENDORS, AND BETTER CONTROL COSTS;20 |
---|
231 | | - | HE EXPECTED COSTS TO THE STATE , COUNTY, AND LOCAL |
---|
232 | | - | GOVERNMENT IF CHANGES ARE NOT MADE TO THE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY |
---|
233 | | - | PROCESS OVER THE NEXT TEN YEARS |
---|
234 | | - | ; AND |
---|
235 | | - | (h) RECOMMENDATIONS, INCLUDING POSSIBLE LEGISLATION, THAT |
---|
236 | | - | WOULD ASSIST IN |
---|
237 | | - | : |
---|
| 214 | + | HE EXPECTED COSTS TO THE STATE , COUNTY, AND LOCAL21 |
---|
| 215 | + | GOVERNMENT IF CHANGES ARE NOT MADE TO THE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY22 |
---|
| 216 | + | PROCESS OVER THE NEXT TEN YEARS ; AND23 |
---|
| 217 | + | (h) R |
---|
| 218 | + | ECOMMENDATIONS, INCLUDING POSSIBLE LEGISLATION, THAT24 |
---|
| 219 | + | WOULD ASSIST IN:25 |
---|
239 | | - | ONTROLLING THE COST OF ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY , INCLUDING |
---|
240 | | - | WHAT CONTRACT OR STATUTORY CHANGES ARE NEEDED TO ALLOW FOR |
---|
241 | | - | PAGE 5-SENATE BILL 25-240 COORDINATED CONTRACT NEGOTIATION AND PAYMENT TO VE NDORS BY THE |
---|
242 | | - | STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS |
---|
243 | | - | ; |
---|
| 221 | + | ONTROLLING THE COST OF ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY ,26 |
---|
| 222 | + | INCLUDING WHAT CONTRACT OR STATUTORY CHANGES ARE NEEDED TO27 |
---|
| 223 | + | 240 |
---|
| 224 | + | -6- ALLOW FOR COORDINATED CONTRACT NEGOTIATION AND PAYMENT TO1 |
---|
| 225 | + | VENDORS BY THE STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ;2 |
---|
253 | | - | ROVIDING EQUITABLE ACCESS TO AND USE OF ELECTRONIC |
---|
254 | | - | DISCOVERY WHILE PROTECTING THE WORK PRODUCT AND MENTAL |
---|
255 | | - | PROCESSES OF PROSECUTION AND DEFENSE |
---|
256 | | - | ; AND |
---|
257 | | - | (V) CONSIDERING PROCEDURAL CHANGES TO EXISTING STATUTES ; |
---|
| 233 | + | ROVIDING EQUITABLE ACCESS TO AND USE OF ELECTRONIC7 |
---|
| 234 | + | DISCOVERY WHILE PROTECTING THE WORK PRODUCT AND MENTAL8 |
---|
| 235 | + | PROCESSES OF PROSECUTION AND DEFENSE ; AND9 |
---|
| 236 | + | (V) C |
---|
| 237 | + | ONSIDERING PROCEDURAL CHANGES TO EXISTING STATUTES ;10 |
---|
266 | | - | AW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES , DISTRICT ATTORNEYS' |
---|
267 | | - | OFFICES, THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL , THE OFFICE OF STATE |
---|
268 | | - | PUBLIC DEFENDER |
---|
269 | | - | , AND THE OFFICE OF ALTERNATE DEFENSE COUNSEL SHALL |
---|
270 | | - | SHARE INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE TASK FORCE REGARDING |
---|
271 | | - | CONTRACTS |
---|
272 | | - | , VENDORS, THE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY PROCESS , AND COSTS |
---|
273 | | - | BUT SHALL NOT SHARE INFORMATION THAT WOULD VIOLATE STATE OR |
---|
274 | | - | FEDERAL LAWS |
---|
275 | | - | , REGULATIONS, OR RULES OR THAT WOULD VIOLATE THE |
---|
276 | | - | RIGHTS OF A PERSON INVOLVED IN A CRIMINAL CASE |
---|
277 | | - | . |
---|
| 244 | + | AW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES , DISTRICT ATTORNEYS'15 |
---|
| 245 | + | OFFICES, THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL , THE OFFICE OF STATE16 |
---|
| 246 | + | PUBLIC DEFENDER, AND THE OFFICE OF ALTERNATE DEFENSE COUNSEL17 |
---|
| 247 | + | SHALL SHARE INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE TASK FORCE REGARDING18 |
---|
| 248 | + | CONTRACTS, VENDORS, THE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY PROCESS, AND COSTS19 |
---|
| 249 | + | BUT SHALL NOT SHARE INFORMATION THAT WOULD VIOLATE STATE OR20 |
---|
| 250 | + | FEDERAL LAWS, REGULATIONS, OR RULES OR THAT WOULD VIOLATE THE21 |
---|
| 251 | + | RIGHTS OF A PERSON INVOLVED IN A CRIMINAL CASE .22 |
---|
279 | | - | HE ENTITIES SPECIFIED IN SUBSECTION (7)(a) OF THIS SECTION |
---|
280 | | - | SHALL RESPOND TO REQUESTS FROM THE TASK FORCE FOR INFORMATION |
---|
281 | | - | PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION |
---|
282 | | - | (7)(a) OF THIS SECTION IN GOOD FAITH AND |
---|
283 | | - | PROVIDE INFORMATION WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME |
---|
284 | | - | . |
---|
| 253 | + | HE ENTITIES SPECIFIED IN SUBSECTION (7)(a) OF THIS SECTION23 |
---|
| 254 | + | SHALL RESPOND TO REQUESTS FROM THE TASK FORCE FOR INFORMATION24 |
---|
| 255 | + | PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (7)(a) OF THIS SECTION IN GOOD FAITH AND25 |
---|
| 256 | + | PROVIDE INFORMATION WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME .26 |
---|
286 | | - | N OR BEFORE NOVEMBER 1, 2025, THE TASK FORCE SHALL |
---|
287 | | - | SUBMIT A REPORT TO THE JO INT BUDGET COMMITTEE AND THE JOINT |
---|
288 | | - | TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE THAT |
---|
289 | | - | , AT A MINIMUM , DESCRIBES THE |
---|
290 | | - | FOLLOWING |
---|
291 | | - | : |
---|
| 258 | + | N OR BEFORE NOVEMBER 1, 2025, THE TASK FORCE SHALL27 |
---|
| 259 | + | 240 |
---|
| 260 | + | -7- SUBMIT A REPORT TO THE JO INT BUDGET COMMITTEE AND THE JOINT1 |
---|
| 261 | + | TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE THAT , AT A MINIMUM , DESCRIBES THE2 |
---|
| 262 | + | FOLLOWING:3 |
---|
293 | | - | HE WORK AND STUDY OF THE TASK FORCE ; |
---|
294 | | - | PAGE 6-SENATE BILL 25-240 (b) THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING THE ISSUES |
---|
295 | | - | AND TOPICS CONSIDERED BY THE TASK FORCE AS DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION |
---|
296 | | - | (6) OF THIS SECTION; AND |
---|
297 | | - | (c) LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS AND EXPECTED RELATED COSTS BASED |
---|
298 | | - | ON THE TASK FORCE |
---|
299 | | - | 'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS . |
---|
| 264 | + | HE WORK AND STUDY OF THE TASK FORCE ;4 |
---|
| 265 | + | (b) T |
---|
| 266 | + | HE FINDINGS AND RECOMME NDATIONS REGARDING THE5 |
---|
| 267 | + | ISSUES AND TOPICS CONSIDERED BY THE TASK FORCE AS DESCRIBED IN6 |
---|
| 268 | + | SUBSECTION (6) OF THIS SECTION; AND7 |
---|
| 269 | + | (c) L |
---|
| 270 | + | EGISLATIVE PROPOSALS AND EXPECTED RELATED COSTS8 |
---|
| 271 | + | BASED ON THE TASK FORCE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .9 |
---|
301 | | - | HIS SECTION IS REPEALED, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2027. |
---|
302 | | - | SECTION 2. Safety clause. The general assembly finds, |
---|
303 | | - | determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate |
---|
304 | | - | preservation of the public peace, health, or safety or for appropriations for |
---|
305 | | - | PAGE 7-SENATE BILL 25-240 the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state |
---|
306 | | - | institutions. |
---|
307 | | - | ____________________________ ____________________________ |
---|
308 | | - | James Rashad Coleman, Sr. Julie McCluskie |
---|
309 | | - | PRESIDENT OF SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE |
---|
310 | | - | THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
---|
311 | | - | ____________________________ ____________________________ |
---|
312 | | - | Esther van Mourik Vanessa Reilly |
---|
313 | | - | SECRETARY OF CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE |
---|
314 | | - | THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES |
---|
315 | | - | APPROVED________________________________________ |
---|
316 | | - | (Date and Time) |
---|
317 | | - | _________________________________________ |
---|
318 | | - | Jared S. Polis |
---|
319 | | - | GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO |
---|
320 | | - | PAGE 8-SENATE BILL 25-240 |
---|
| 273 | + | HIS SECTION IS REPEALED, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2027.10 |
---|
| 274 | + | SECTION 2. Safety clause. The general assembly finds,11 |
---|
| 275 | + | determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate12 |
---|
| 276 | + | preservation of the public peace, health, or safety or for appropriations for13 |
---|
| 277 | + | the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state14 |
---|
| 278 | + | institutions.15 |
---|
| 279 | + | 240 |
---|
| 280 | + | -8- |
---|