Colorado 2025 Regular Session

Colorado Senate Bill SB288

Introduced
4/9/25  
Refer
4/9/25  
Report Pass
4/21/25  
Refer
4/21/25  
Engrossed
4/29/25  
Refer
4/29/25  
Report Pass
5/3/25  
Refer
5/3/25  
Enrolled
5/6/25  
Enrolled
5/13/25  
Engrossed
5/13/25  
Engrossed
5/13/25  

Caption

Intimate Digital Depictions Criminal & Civil Actions

Impact

The bill significantly updates Colorado's criminal statutes by adding provisions that specifically address the unauthorized distribution of intimate digital images. It creates a legal framework where depicted individuals can pursue civil action against those who disclose their images without consent, holding offenders accountable for emotional or reputational harm caused by such disclosures. Moreover, the bill includes enhanced penalties for those acting with malicious intent, and it reinforces privacy rights within the digital context.

Summary

Senate Bill 288 introduces the Preventing Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate Digital Depictions Act, aimed at criminalizing the nonconsensual disclosure of intimate digital images. It outlines definitions for terms such as 'intimate digital depiction' and specifies consent requirements, emphasizing that consent to create such depictions does not imply consent for disclosure. The bill establishes that any disclosed image can lead to civil actions if it causes emotional distress or violates the depicted individual's rights.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB288 tends to show support for strengthening privacy rights and protecting individuals from harassment through digital means. Advocates argue it is an essential step in recognizing the harms associated with nonconsensual image sharing, especially as technology continues to evolve. However, there are concerns regarding the implications for free speech and the balance between protecting individuals and potential overreach that could impact lawful expression.

Contention

Notable points of contention during discussions include the bill's definitions and the broad potential implications on free speech. Some critics argue that the definitions, particularly around what constitutes an 'intimate digital depiction,' might be overly inclusive. Additionally, debates arose around the adequacy of existing laws and the potential burden on law enforcement to differentiate between malicious intent and benign behavior.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB602

Depiction of individual using digital or electronic technology: sexually explicit material: cause of action.

NC H375

AI/Ban Deceptive Ads

WV SB198

Prohibiting creation, production, distribution, or possession of artificially generated child pornography

RI H8129

Includes visual images that are created or manipulated by digitization, or without the consent of the person, within the purview of the crime of unauthorized dissemination of indecent material and expands jurisdiction of the crime.

DE HB353

An Act To Amend Titles 10 And 11 Of The Delaware Code Relating To Deep Fakes.

MS SB2437

"Prohibition of Exploitation by Deepfakes Act"; enact.

SC H3406

Online technological exploitation

WV SB740

Prohibiting digital manipulation of sexually explicit content to include minors