Connecticut 2010 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05090

Introduced
2/9/10  
Refer
2/9/10  
Report Pass
3/18/10  
Refer
3/29/10  
Report Pass
4/6/10  
Refer
4/13/10  
Report Pass
4/14/10  
Engrossed
4/28/10  

Caption

An Act Regulating Third-party Administrators And Rate Approvals For Certain Health Insurance Policies.

Impact

The implementation of HB 05090 will lead to a substantial change in how third-party administrators operate within the state. By requiring licensing, it effectively raises the standard for TPAs, ensuring they adhere to state regulations regarding financial management, transparency, and client communication. This move is anticipated to improve the overall quality of service and compliance within the health insurance sector, providing greater protection for consumers. Additionally, the bill aligns state regulations with national standards, reflecting broader trends in insurance reform.

Summary

House Bill 05090 seeks to regulate third-party administrators (TPAs) involved in health insurance operations in the state. The bill sets forth a framework requiring third-party administrators to be licensed and outlines their responsibilities concerning the administration of insurance policies. By establishing clear operational guidelines and licensure requirements, the bill aims to enhance accountability and reduce fraudulent activities linked to TPAs. The legislation also stipulates the financial practices expected of TPAs, ensuring they handle collected funds responsibly in a fiduciary manner.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 05090 appears to be predominantly positive among proponents of regulatory reform, who view the bill as a necessary measure to ensure ethical practices within the insurance industry. Supporters argue that the increased regulation of TPAs will help protect consumers and support fair market practices. However, some stakeholders have expressed concerns about the potential for additional regulatory burdens on TPAs, particularly smaller firms that may struggle with compliance costs associated with licensing and reporting requirements.

Contention

Key points of contention in discussions about HB 05090 focus on the balance between necessary regulation and operational flexibility for third-party administrators. Critics highlight the possibility that overly stringent regulations could stifle innovation and raise costs for TPAs, leading to increased insurance premiums for consumers. Additionally, discussions have included concerns about how these regulations might affect the availability of TPA services, particularly for smaller employers or groups seeking cost-effective insurance solutions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB05029

An Act Concerning The Licensing And Regulation Of Third-party Administrators.

CT HB06307

An Act Regulating Third-party Administrators.

KY HB350

AN ACT relating to insurance regulatory requirements.

CA SB1482

Commercial financing.

CA SB1087

PACE program: program administrators.

TX HB3320

Relating to a property and casualty self-insurance pool for certain religious institutions; authorizing fees; providing administrative penalties.

CA AB237

Pilot Program for Increased Access to Responsible Small Dollar Loans.

CA SB869

Commercial financing.