Connecticut House Bill HB05251

Connecticut 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/18/10
• Refer: 2/18/10
• Report Pass: 3/3/10
• Refer: 3/9/10
• Report Pass: 3/16/10
• Engrossed: 4/7/10
• Report Pass: 4/8/10
• Chaptered: 5/14/10
• Enrolled: 5/19/10
• Passed: 6/2/10

Caption

An Act Concerning Payment Of The Costs Of Forensic Sexual Assault Evidence Examinations And The Collection Of Dna Samples.

Impact

The introduction of HB 5251 aims to amend existing laws to protect victims of sexual assault from being financially liable for crucial examinations that can gather evidence for criminal proceedings. This aligns with ongoing efforts to enhance victim support and improve access to justice for survivors of sexual violence. Moreover, the bill extends responsibilities to various corrections and health service departments regarding the collection and management of DNA samples from offenders, reinforcing efforts to utilize DNA in criminal identification effectively.

Summary

House Bill 5251 focuses on ensuring that the monetary costs related to forensic sexual assault examinations and the collection of DNA samples from offenders are not charged to victims of sexual assault. Instead, these costs are to be borne by the Office of Victim Services within the Judicial Department. The intent of this bill is to alleviate the financial burden on victims, thereby encouraging individuals who have experienced sexual assault to seek necessary medical examinations without fear of incurring costs.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 5251 is predominantly positive, with strong support from victim advocacy groups and many lawmakers who view the bill as a step toward better protecting the rights of victims. Proponents argue that the elimination of costs associated with examinations is a vital aspect of encouraging reporting and prosecution of sexual assault cases. Critics, however, raise concerns about the potential implications for funding and resources within the system responsible for managing these forensic services, emphasizing the need for sustainable funding solutions.

Contention

Notably, there is some contention about how the bill's implementation will be funded and whether it might strain the Office of Victim Services. Additionally, discussion surrounds the evolution of practices in dealing with DNA collection and management, particularly concerning how to ensure that samples are taken appropriately and ethically. The balance between ensuring that victims are not burdened financially while managing the logistical challenges of DNA evidence collection remains a topic of lively debate.