An Act Implementing The Recommendations Of The Program Review And Investigations Committee Concerning Scope Of Practice Determinations For Health Care Professions.
Impact
The bill's implementation is significant for state laws governing healthcare professions, as it establishes clear guidelines for modifying the legal scope for various health professionals. By mandating a process and evaluation criteria for these requests, the legislation intends to ensure that any expansions or adjustments to scope of practice are substantiated with data demonstrating benefits to public health and safety. This change is expected to enhance regulatory oversight by requiring accountability and transparency concerning how such decisions are made and who is involved in the process.
Summary
House Bill 05258 aims to implement recommendations from the Program Review and Investigations Committee regarding scope of practice determinations for healthcare professions. The bill introduces a structured process wherein health care entities must formally request any legislative changes that modify their scope of practice. This written request must include comprehensive information such as public health benefits, impacts on healthcare access, relevant state and federal laws, and any anticipated economic effects on the profession involved.
Sentiment
General sentiment around HB 05258 appears to be cautiously optimistic, with supporters acknowledging the necessity of a systematic approach to scope of practice requests. However, there is a recognition of potential contention from various health professions, which may oppose specific requests for extensions of practice. The sentiment reflects a balance between advancing legislative efficiency and ensuring stakeholder engagement from a diverse range of healthcare professionals impacted by these changes.
Contention
Notable points of contention associated with HB 05258 relate to the potential for conflict among different healthcare professions regarding scope of practice requests. The legislation stipulates that any profession opposing a request can submit a formal objection, which may lead to disputes over the proposed changes. Critics express concerns that this might favor certain groups over others, potentially undermining the integrity of healthcare delivery if not managed carefully. As practitioners strive for more complete roles within their fields, the conversation around scope of practice remains complex and contentious.
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
A concurrent resolution recognizing wild rice as sacred and central to the culture and health of Indigenous Peoples in Minnesota and critical to the health and identity of all Minnesota citizens and ecosystems and establishing a commitment to passing legislation to protect wild rice and the freshwater resources upon which it depends.