Connecticut 2010 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05296

Introduced
2/23/10  
Refer
2/23/10  
Report Pass
3/23/10  
Refer
3/29/10  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Definition Of Medical Necessity.

Impact

The bill impacts state laws by modifying existing definitions and guidelines related to medical necessity within health assistance programs. By standardizing the criteria for what constitutes medical necessity, the bill seeks to enhance the reliability of healthcare services provided to the state's residents. One of the significant ramifications includes the power granted to the Department of Social Services to amend inconsistent definitions in Connecticut state regulations regarding medical services, aligning them with the new legislation.

Summary

House Bill 05296 aims to establish a clear definition of 'medical necessity' as it relates to the administration of medical assistance programs in Connecticut. The bill delineates what health services qualify as medically necessary for individuals under these programs, outlining criteria that these services must meet. This framework is intended to ensure consistency in the delivery of healthcare services, particularly for those receiving assistance, facilitating a more systematic approach to healthcare provision influenced by best practices in medicine.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 05296 appears to be generally positive among health advocates and providers who appreciate the clarity this bill brings to the process of determining medical necessity. Supporters argue that it will pave the way for more equitable access to necessary healthcare services. Conversely, there are concerns from some stakeholders who fear that rigid definitions might limit access to vital care, particularly if services deemed 'medically unnecessary' by the state could be essential for individual cases.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the level of discretion that the Department of Social Services will have in determining medical necessity and how this could impact individual cases. Stakeholders worry that the guidelines could lead to overly bureaucratic practices that may deny patients services their healthcare providers deem essential, thus revealing a tension between standardized regulation and personalized healthcare needs. The definition of medical necessity is crucial, as it reflects both clinical appropriateness and the evolving standards of medical practice.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HB05368

An Act Concerning Medicaid Coverage Of Diapers.

CT HB05367

An Act Concerning Medicaid Coverage Of Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing For Critically Ill Infants And Studies Concerning The Elimination Or Reduction Of The Katie Beckett Waiver Program Waiting List And Medicaid Coverage Of Diapers.

CT SB00307

An Act Concerning Medicaid Coverage Of Biomarker Testing.

CT SB00395

An Act Concerning The Reporting Of Medical Debt.

CT SB00314

An Act Concerning Emergency Medicaid Coverage For Treatment Of Emergency Medical Conditions.

CT HB05456

An Act Concerning Federally Qualified Health Centers.

CT SB00366

An Act Concerning Medicaid.

CT HB05240

An Act Concerning Medicaid Coverage For Infertility Treatment.

CT HB05459

An Act Increasing Rates Of Medicaid Reimbursement For Certain Providers.

CT HB05427

An Act Concerning Nonemergency Medical Transportation.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.