Connecticut 2010 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05307

Introduced
2/23/10  
Refer
2/23/10  
Report Pass
3/15/10  
Refer
3/19/10  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Filling Of Prescriptions For Antiepileptic Drugs.

Impact

The bill is set to amend existing statutes regarding pharmacy practices, particularly in how pharmacists handle prescriptions for antiepileptic medications. If enacted, it would limit the ability of pharmacists to switch patients from prescribed antiepileptic drugs to other generics or formulations unless certain conditions are met. This guarantees that patients who rely on specific medications for managing their epilepsy will have greater assurance about the consistency of their treatments, potentially leading to improved health outcomes.

Summary

House Bill 5307 addresses the process for filling prescriptions for antiepileptic drugs, emphasizing the importance of maintaining efficacy and safety for patients suffering from epilepsy. The bill establishes that a pharmacist can substitute a prescribed drug with a generic equivalent only if the drug is deemed therapeutically equivalent. The clarification of definitions surrounding drug names and forms is intended to prevent any confusion and ensure that patients receive the correct treatment as directed by their healthcare providers.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 5307 appears to be largely supportive among advocates for patient safety and those concerned about the management of epilepsy. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary measure to protect vulnerable populations from inappropriate substitutions that could lead to adverse effects. There is, however, some concern regarding the implications for pharmacists' ability to operate flexibly within their professional judgment, which could elicit mixed responses from various healthcare stakeholders.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the extent to which pharmacists should be able to exercise their professional discretion in substituting medications and the administrative burden placed on them to obtain and document consent from prescribing practitioners. Some stakeholders express concern that requiring prior approval from healthcare providers may slow down the dispensing process, potentially impacting patient care. Additionally, there are discussions about the need for regulations to ensure that patients are adequately informed throughout the prescription filling process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT SB00133

An Act Concerning Regulation Of Prescription Drugs And Related Professions.

CT SB00202

An Act Concerning The Department Of Consumer Protection's Recommendations Regarding Prescription Drug Control.

CT HB05235

An Act Concerning The Department Of Consumer Protection's Recommendations Regarding Cannabis Regulation.

CT HB05150

An Act Concerning Cannabis And Hemp Regulation.

CT SB00008

An Act Concerning Drug Affordability.

CT HB05290

An Act Concerning Various Revisions To The Public Health Statutes.

CT HB05488

An Act Concerning Various Revisions To The Public Health Statutes.

CT HB05198

An Act Concerning Telehealth.

CT HB05348

An Act Concerning Paraeducators.

CT SB00134

An Act Concerning The Legislative Commissioners' Recommendations For Minor And Technical Revisions To Statutes Concerning Consumer Protection.

Similar Bills

CT SB00197

An Act Concerning Biological Products.

CT SB00313

An Act Concerning Biological Products.

CT HB07118

An Act Concerning Biological Products.

CT HB07159

An Act Addressing Opioid Use.

UT SB0236

Pharmacy Practice Amendments

CT SB00895

An Act Concerning Changes To Various Pharmacy Statutes.

CT HB05610

An Act Concerning The Duties Of A Pharmacist When Filling A Prescription Used For The Treatment Of Epilepsy Or Prevention Of Seizures.

TX SB190

Relating to the prescription and pharmaceutical substitution of biological products.