Connecticut House Bill HB05385

Connecticut 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/25/10
• Refer: 2/25/10

Caption

An Act Concerning The Use Of Ignition Interlock Devices In Motor Vehicles.

Summary

House Bill 05385 focuses on enhancing the enforcement of driving under the influence (DUI) regulations through the mandatory use of ignition interlock devices. The bill amends various sections of state law concerning the procedures and penalties for individuals found guilty of DUI offenses. By requiring these devices, the bill aims to enhance public safety by preventing repeat offenses among individuals with a history of alcohol-related driving violations. This legislative effort is a response to increasing concerns over road safety, particularly pertaining to repeat offenders who pose significant risks to themselves and others on the road. Another major provision of HB05385 is the requirement that individuals with a suspended license due to DUI must install and maintain an ignition interlock device in any vehicle they operate. The bill outlines that all associated costs for the installation and maintenance of these devices will be the responsibility of the offender. Furthermore, the bill permits individuals to request a hearing for the reduction or reversal of their license suspension, contingent upon their compliance with alcohol education programs and the installation of the interlock device. The bill also introduces stricter penalties for multiple offenses, with fines and potential imprisonment periods increasing significantly with each repeat violation. Proponents argue that these measures are necessary to deter repeat offenders and promote responsible driving behavior, with the goal of reducing DUI incidents and enhancing overall road safety within the state. While supporters laud the bill for its potential to improve public safety, there are notable points of contention. Critics express concerns regarding the financial burden placed on low-income individuals who may struggle to afford the ignition interlock devices and educational programs. Additionally, there are concerns about the bill's implications for personal freedoms and the extent to which the state can regulate individual behavior after a DUI conviction. These disagreements highlight ongoing tensions in balancing public safety initiatives with individual rights.