Connecticut 2010 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05463

Introduced
3/4/10  
Introduced
3/4/10  
Refer
3/4/10  
Refer
3/4/10  
Report Pass
3/18/10  
Report Pass
3/18/10  
Refer
3/29/10  
Refer
3/29/10  
Report Pass
4/6/10  
Report Pass
4/6/10  
Engrossed
4/21/10  
Engrossed
4/21/10  
Report Pass
4/23/10  
Report Pass
4/23/10  
Refer
4/28/10  
Refer
4/28/10  
Report Pass
4/30/10  
Report Pass
4/30/10  
Report Pass
4/30/10  

Caption

An Act Concerning Periodic Review Of Video Providers.

Impact

The implementation of this bill is expected to enhance oversight of video service providers, ensuring that they adhere to regulations intended to protect consumers. By establishing a structured review process that includes opportunities for hearings and input from affected parties, the bill aims to foster accountability and responsiveness among video providers. This may lead to improved service quality and better support for underrepresented groups, such as low-income customers and individuals with disabilities, who may have specific needs regarding media access.

Summary

House Bill 05463, known as An Act Concerning Periodic Review Of Video Providers, mandates that the Department of Public Utility Control conduct a biennial performance review of all companies providing community antenna television service, cable franchise authority, or video franchise authority. The goal of this act is to ensure that these providers comply with the terms and conditions of their respective certificates, which cover customer service standards, community access support, and other operational aspects critical to consumer protection.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 05463 appears to be positive, particularly among advocacy groups focused on consumer rights and accessibility. Supporters view the bill as a necessary step to strengthen regulatory oversight in an industry that has undergone significant changes due to technological advancements and shifting consumer demands. However, some stakeholders may express concerns about the agency’s capacity to effectively conduct these reviews, fearing that increased regulations could create burdens for smaller providers.

Contention

While the bill is generally received well, potential points of contention could arise over the specifics of the performance criteria and the extent of regulatory oversight. Companies may argue against increased scrutiny if they believe it hampers their operations or introduces excessive red tape. Additionally, discussions might surface regarding what constitutes satisfactory performance, especially concerning customer service and community engagement initiatives, which can vary widely in interpretation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HB05446

An Act Concerning Funding For Community Access Television, The Connecticut Television Network And Low-income Internet Access And Taxation Of Communications Services Providers.

CT HB05450

An Act Concerning Artificial Intelligence, Deceptive Synthetic Media And Elections.

CT SB00003

An Act Concerning Consumer Protection.

CT SB00180

An Act Concerning Adverse Determination And Utilization Reviews.

CT SB00301

An Act Concerning Energy Efficiency Standards And Grants For Retrofitting Projects.

CT HB05361

An Act Concerning The Siting Of Renewable Energy Sources In The State.

CT SB00002

An Act Concerning Artificial Intelligence.

CT SB00431

An Act Concerning Fees For Copying, Reviewing And Redacting Records Created By Police Body-worn Recording Equipment And Dashboard Cameras.

CT HB05153

An Act Concerning Eligibility For Workforce Housing Development Projects.

CT HB05248

An Act Concerning Health Benefit Review.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.