Connecticut House Bill HB05524

Connecticut 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/10
• Refer: 3/12/10

Caption

An Act Concerning Criminal Records And Sentence Review.

Impact

The amendments proposed by HB 05524 have implications for existing statutes, particularly surrounding the management of criminal records as stipulated in the General Statutes. By altering definitions and access rights regarding nonconviction information, the bill aims to foster a more structured approach to how these records are handled, potentially affecting the experiences of individuals previously convicted. It seeks to create a clearer framework that outlines who can access these records and under what circumstances, thus aiming to enhance individual rights in the context of criminal justice.

Summary

House Bill 05524, titled 'An Act Concerning Criminal Records and Sentence Review,' is designed to amend existing laws regarding the handling of nonconviction information and the process for sentence review in the state. The bill provides specific guidelines for the disclosure of nonconviction information, ensuring that such records can only be accessed by authorized entities, while also limiting the public's access to certain criminal records-related details. The purpose of this legislation is to streamline the judicial process for individuals seeking to review their sentences while protecting sensitive information from undue exposure.

Contention

One notable point of contention pertains to the balance between transparency in the criminal justice system and the privacy rights of individuals involved. Proponents of the bill argue that it is essential to limit the disclosure of sensitive information to reduce the stigma faced by individuals who have not been convicted of crimes, thereby promoting reintegration into society. However, critics may raise concerns about the potential for evasion of accountability or the implications for public access to such records, arguing that the proposed restrictions might complicate background checks or similar processes. The debate over informational access versus privacy continues to be pivotal as discussions surrounding this bill evolve.