Connecticut 2010 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00001

Introduced
2/3/10  
Refer
2/3/10  
Refer
2/24/10  
Report Pass
4/1/10  
Refer
4/12/10  
Report Pass
4/19/10  
Engrossed
4/30/10  
Chaptered
5/11/10  
Enrolled
5/17/10  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Preservation And Creation Of Jobs In Connecticut.

Impact

The implications of SB00001 are significant, as it seeks to incentivize job retention and creation in Connecticut while also addressing the aftermath of the financial crisis through the federal Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP). The bill stipulates that any TARP bonus received by corporations shall incur an additional state tax, which aims to distribute the financial burden more equitably among entities that received federal aid. This could affect various businesses' operational costs and decisions regarding employment and investment in the state.

Summary

SB00001, an Act Concerning The Preservation And Creation Of Jobs In Connecticut, aims to modify tax liabilities for certain business entities within the state. The bill focuses primarily on defines affected business entities as limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships, limited partnerships, and S corporations, instituting a tax requirement based on net income and employment metrics. Businesses that qualify – defined by reporting net income of $50,000 or less and employing at least one full-time employee for a specific duration – are exempt from this tax during the initial years of the bill's enactment.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB00001 has been largely supportive among proponents who argue that it offers vital support to businesses struggling in a challenging economic climate. Advocates contend it can stimulate economic growth and job creation. Conversely, there are concerns regarding its impact on revenue collections due to the exemptions provided to specific business entities, raising questions about equity and long-term sustainability of the tax base.

Contention

Notable points of contention focus on the fairness of the tax system, especially concerning the TARP bonuses. Critics express apprehension that providing tax exemptions for certain businesses could lead to revenue loss for the state, potentially constraining resources for essential public services. These discussions reflect a broader debate about the balance between supporting economic recovery and ensuring that fiscal policies remain equitable to all sectors of the economy.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.