Connecticut 2010 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00016

Introduced
2/3/10  
Refer
2/3/10  
Report Pass
2/11/10  
Refer
2/25/10  
Report Pass
3/3/10  

Caption

An Act Phasing Out The Insurance Premium Tax For Municipalities.

Impact

The passage of SB00016 would substantially alter the state statutes regarding taxation on insurance premiums, specifically benefiting local governments. By eliminating this tax, municipalities may find it easier to maintain or expand health care offerings for employees, potentially leading to improved employee satisfaction and retention. Additionally, it may foster a more favorable economic environment for local government operations as they would have more financial resources allocated for other services or infrastructure development.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 16 aims to phase out the insurance premium tax for municipalities. The bill establishes a gradual reduction in the tax rate applied to health care coverage contracts with municipalities, specifically targeting health care premiums for municipal employees, retirees, and their dependents. The tax rate is set to decrease from one and three-tenths percent in the initial income years to zero percent starting January 1, 2013. This legislative move is intended to provide financial relief to municipal entities that provide health coverage to their employees, encouraging more comprehensive health care benefits without the additional tax burden.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment regarding SB00016 appears positive, particularly among local government officials and labor unions who support enhanced health care benefits. Advocates argue that the bill addresses financial burdens imposed by the current tax structures, thereby allowing municipalities to better serve their constituents. However, concerns may arise from state lawmakers who view this as a reduction in tax revenue that could affect state funding or priorities, indicating a split in views on financial responsibility and management.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the potential long-term fiscal implications. Opponents of the bill may voice concerns regarding revenue loss for the state as a result of the tax phase-out, alongside worries that exempting municipalities from this tax could inspire similar demands from other sectors. There may also be discussions about the balance between necessary state funding for public services and the increased autonomy given to municipalities in managing their health care costs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HB05209

An Act Concerning Long-term Care Insurance Premium Rates.

CT HB05503

An Act Concerning Insurance Market Conduct And Insurance Licensing, The Insurance Department's Technical Corrections And Other Revisions To The Insurance Statutes And Captive Insurance.

CT SB00400

An Act Concerning The Insurance Department's Technical Corrections And Other Revisions To The Insurance Statutes.

CT SB00398

An Act Concerning The Regulation And Taxation Of Travel Insurance And Associated Entities, Products And Professionals.

CT HB05250

An Act Concerning Self-service Storage Insurance.

CT SB00341

An Act Establishing A Fallen Officer Fund And Providing Health Insurance Coverage To Survivors Of A Police Officer Killed In The Line Of Duty.

CT SB00372

An Act Concerning A Working Group To Study Payments By Insurance Companies For Deposit Into The Insurance Fund.

CT SB00404

An Act Concerning Affordability As A Factor In Premium Rate Filings For Individual And Group Health Insurance Policies.

CT SB00182

An Act Prohibiting Certain Health Carriers From Requiring Step Therapy For Prescription Drugs Used To Treat A Mental Or Behavioral Health Condition Or A Chronic, Disabling Or Life-threatening Condition.

CT SB00395

An Act Concerning The Reporting Of Medical Debt.

Similar Bills

CA AB954

Dental services: third-party network access.

DC B25-0265

Contract No. GAGA-2022-C-0259 with SodexoMagic, LLC Approval and Payment Authorization Emergency Act of 2023

TX SB543

Relating to oversight of and requirements applicable to state contracts and other state financial and accounting issues; authorizing fees.

TX HB1426

Relating to certain requirements applicable to contracts entered into by, and the contract management process of, state agencies.

MS HB934

Healthcare Contracting Simplification Act; create.

NJ S3443

Requires State Contract Managers to monitor work conducted by subcontractors on State contracts.

NJ A4487

Requires State Contract Managers to monitor work conducted by subcontractors on State contracts.

CA SB681

Public employees’ retirement: contracting agencies: termination.