Connecticut 2010 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00017

Introduced
2/3/10  
Refer
2/3/10  
Report Pass
2/23/10  
Refer
3/5/10  
Report Pass
3/11/10  
Refer
4/8/10  
Report Pass
4/14/10  
Report Pass
4/14/10  
Engrossed
4/21/10  
Report Pass
4/22/10  
Chaptered
5/12/10  
Enrolled
5/17/10  

Caption

An Act Concerning Health Care Provider Rental Network Contract Arrangements.

Impact

The implementation of SB00017 will have a significant effect on state laws governing healthcare provider contracts. By requiring contracting entities to maintain up-to-date information on which providers their services and rates are shared with, the bill aims to improve accountability and reduce instances of confusion regarding fee structures. Additionally, the bill designates violations of these provisions as unfair or deceptive practices under existing insurance regulations, thus providing a legal framework for healthcare providers to address grievances.

Summary

SB00017, also known as the Act Concerning Health Care Provider Rental Network Contract Arrangements, aims to establish specific requirements for contracts between healthcare providers and contracting entities. The bill mandates that any such contract must clearly state the terms concerning the selling, leasing, or sharing of provider services and related fees. This provision seeks to enhance transparency in provider networks, ensuring that healthcare providers are well-informed about how their services may be utilized and compensated.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00017 has been generally positive among healthcare providers who see the bill as a step toward greater clarity and fairness in their interactions with contracting entities. Proponents believe that the bill will alleviate concerns about undisclosed practices and improve the overall functioning of rental network contracts. However, some contracting entities have expressed reservations about the potential burdens imposed by these requirements, fearing it may complicate operations or increase costs.

Contention

Notably, the bill has sparked discussions around the balance of power between healthcare providers and contracting entities. Critics argue that excessive regulatory requirements may disincentivize entities from engaging in contractual agreements, while supporters contend that both providers and patients stand to benefit from greater transparency. The ongoing dialogue underscores the complexity of healthcare economic interactions and highlights a need for ongoing assessment of regulatory impacts.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB954

Dental services: third-party network access.

DC B25-0265

Contract No. GAGA-2022-C-0259 with SodexoMagic, LLC Approval and Payment Authorization Emergency Act of 2023

TX SB543

Relating to oversight of and requirements applicable to state contracts and other state financial and accounting issues; authorizing fees.

TX HB1426

Relating to certain requirements applicable to contracts entered into by, and the contract management process of, state agencies.

MS HB934

Healthcare Contracting Simplification Act; create.

NJ S3443

Requires State Contract Managers to monitor work conducted by subcontractors on State contracts.

NJ A4487

Requires State Contract Managers to monitor work conducted by subcontractors on State contracts.

CA SB681

Public employees’ retirement: contracting agencies: termination.