Connecticut 2010 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00182

Introduced
2/17/10  
Refer
2/17/10  
Report Pass
3/18/10  
Refer
3/29/10  

Caption

An Act Concerning Revisions To The Utility Statutes.

Impact

The bill is expected to have a significant impact on state laws regarding utility service termination. By implementing stricter regulations around financial hardships and service disconnections, SB00182 aims to prevent life-threatening situations caused by lack of heating during colder months. It mandates public service companies, electric distribution companies, and gas companies to accommodate customers struggling to make payments. This revision not only strengthens consumer rights but also promotes a more socially responsible utility industry.

Summary

SB00182, titled 'An Act Concerning Revisions To The Utility Statutes,' introduces several amendments to the existing utility regulations. The bill aims to enhance protections for vulnerable customers unable to pay their utility bills, specifically during the winter months when disconnections for non-payment would otherwise occur. By extending these protections, the bill ensures that residents facing financial hardships can maintain essential services like electricity and gas without fear of service termination. This approach demonstrates a commitment to safeguard public welfare and assist those in need during difficult times.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB00182 appears to be favorable among consumer advocacy groups and legislators who prioritize social welfare. Supporters argue that the legislation is vital for protecting low-income households from losing access to essential services. There is, however, a concern from some utility providers about the potential financial impact this bill could encumber, suggesting that while the intentions are noble, the practical implications on operational costs and service distribution may be challenging.

Contention

Some notable points of contention include the potential backlash from utility companies who may argue that such financial protections might lead to increased operational costs and subsequent rate hikes. Additionally, there are discussions regarding the balance between providing essential customer protections and the economic feasibility for utility companies. Critics question whether extending these protections could inadvertently result in less efficient service delivery or a mismatch in resource allocation within the utilities sector.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB05484

An Act Concerning Shared Renewable Energy Facilities.

PA HB2345

Providing for consumer choice billing; imposing penalties; and making repeals.

PA SB833

Providing for consumer choice billing; imposing penalties; and making repeals.

CT SB00002

An Act Concerning Electric Customer Consumer Protection.

PA SB558

In natural gas competition, further providing for standards for restructuring of natural gas utility industry, for consumer protections and customer service and for requirements for natural gas suppliers; and, in restructuring of electric utility industry, further providing for standards for restructuring of electric industry, for duties of electric distribution companies and for requirements for electric generation suppliers.

CT HB05507

An Act Concerning Consumer Protections In The Retail Electricity Market.

IN HB1304

Distributed energy generation.

IN SB0248

Distributed energy generation.