Connecticut 2010 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00262

Introduced
2/23/10  
Refer
2/23/10  
Report Pass
3/10/10  
Refer
3/12/10  
Report Pass
3/18/10  
Refer
4/8/10  
Report Pass
4/12/10  
Report Pass
4/14/10  
Engrossed
5/1/10  

Caption

An Act Concerning Collaborative Drug Therapy Management Agreements.

Impact

If enacted, SB00262 will modify the existing statutes governing collaborative practice agreements in the state. This change will facilitate a more integrated approach to drug therapy management by empowering pharmacists to take on more responsibilities in patient care. The bill outlines specific requirements for documentation and reporting, requiring pharmacists to regularly update physicians on patient status, which aims to foster better collaborative practices for improved health outcomes. The protocols established must also comply with oversight from the Department of Public Health and Consumer Protection.

Summary

SB00262, titled 'An Act Concerning Collaborative Drug Therapy Management Agreements', aims to expand the role of pharmacists within the healthcare system by enabling them to work collaboratively with physicians in managing drug therapies for patients. This bill permits pharmacists to enter into written protocol-based agreements with licensed physicians to oversee patient medication management, particularly for conditions such as diabetes, asthma, hypertension, and more. The intent is to enhance patient care by allowing pharmacists to implement, modify, or discontinue medications as per the agreed protocols, thereby streamlining healthcare delivery.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00262 appears to be predominantly positive among healthcare professionals. Supporters advocate for the bill's potential benefits in promoting efficient healthcare practices and improving patient outcomes. Many see the collaboration between pharmacists and physicians as a forward-thinking approach to healthcare management. However, there may also be concerns regarding the extent of the pharmacist's authority to modify and administer drug therapies, which could lead to discussions about appropriate training and regulations to ensure patient safety.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support, it is likely that it will face scrutiny over issues such as the competence and training required for pharmacists to participate in these agreements. Critics might express concerns about the adequacy of oversight and whether pharmacists have the necessary medical training to make adjustments to prescribed therapies. Additionally, there may be debate over the supervision of these collaborative agreements and how they might vary by practice setting, prompting discussions on uniform standards and practices in drug therapy management.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT SB00186

An Act Concerning Collaborative Drug Therapy Management Agreements And Policies.

DE SB165

An Act To Amend Title 24 Of The Delaware Code Relating To Pharmacy.

VA HB1582

Pharmacists; collaborative agreements, drug therapy.

KS HB2369

Allowing pharmacists to administer certain vaccines to children and adults pursuant to a vaccination protocol.

CA SB524

Pharmacists: furnishing prescription medications.

LA SB329

Provides relative to statewide protocols for pharmacists. (8/1/22)

RI H5852

Expands the existing law regarding collaborative practice agreements between pharmacists and physicians to allow other healthcare providers to enter into such agreements and removes the definition of “collaborative practice committee.”

RI S0683

Expands the existing law regarding collaborative practice agreements to allow non-physician healthcare providers to enter into such agreements.