Connecticut 2010 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00271

Introduced
2/24/10  
Refer
2/24/10  
Report Pass
3/16/10  
Refer
3/23/10  
Report Pass
3/30/10  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Treasurer's Trust Preferred Security Purchase Program.

Impact

The proposed legislation is expected to enhance the stability of trust funds managed by the Treasurer by providing a mechanism for investment in securities deemed to meet state regulations. By allowing the Treasurer to purchase these securities, which can be classified as Tier 1 capital, the bill aims to bolster the financial foundation of participating institutions while also potentially yielding higher returns for the state’s trust funds. This could have broader implications for the state’s banking sector and its regulatory environment.

Summary

SB00271, titled 'An Act Concerning The Treasurer's Trust Preferred Security Purchase Program,' aims to establish a framework for the Treasurer of Connecticut to purchase and acquire trust preferred securities issued by eligible institutions. The bill specifically defines eligible institutions and outlines the requirements for those institutions to form an issuing trust for the purpose of issuing Connecticut trust preferred securities. This legislation seeks to optimize the management of state trust funds and strengthen the financial infrastructure within the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00271 appears to be generally supportive among financial regulators and institutions looking to enhance their capital structures. However, there may be some contention regarding the appropriateness of the state's role in directly investing in financial instruments. The conversation among stakeholders suggests a recognition of the need for careful oversight and regulation to ensure that such actions do not inadvertently expose the state's finances to undue risk.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounds the definition of 'eligible institutions,' as the bill provides the Banking Commissioner with the authority to certify which entities meet the criteria. This centralization of authority might raise concerns among critics who fear that it could lead to favoritism or exclusion of smaller financial institutions that could also benefit from participation. Furthermore, the regulatory framework that the Commissioner is allowed to establish could face scrutiny to ensure transparency and accountability in the selection and certification process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.